tsky429
Member
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2013
- Messages
- 47
- Likes
- 0
- Points
- 6
So I was thinking of this the other day and I know it's not practical, but it's an interesting idea to chew on. Hear me out.
So like most Yankee fans, i believe that if you are not going to win the World Series, I don't care if you win 84 games or 64, as long as I know they are improving.
My proposal is this:
For several season go with a Moneyball type system. Keep the payroll for the active roster around 80-100 million. Invest in players the A's invest in. Look really in depth for sabremetrics and at worst, you field an 80 win team hopefully, with room for more. If the A's can do it, why can't the Yankees with twice the budget?
Now for the radical idea: all that is good and well, but it's not really improving the Yankees for the long term, my next idea is a radical way to improve the farm system that I've never seen a team do before
It is to allocate over 100 million for signing big free agents. hanley, scherzer, lester, stanton eventually, really anyone who's a big FA. Then trade them all for top prospects but eat most of the salary. you don't see big players getting traded for top prospects unless they don't have a big contract or they have an expiring one, people don't want to lose prospects and take on a huge payroll. So don't let them. Say Scherzer is signed for 24 million a season. Eat 16 of that. And you are now shopping a Cy young winner for just 8 million dollars, the prospects you can get for him is probably baffling.
Do that for like 4 big free agents, land close to 10 top prospects, and mix prospects and moneyball for awhile until you can sign some big free agents or make some big trades have a little more financial stability.
Sure they will be paying well over 200 million a year and less than half of that for active players, but it's improving the team, no?
Thoughts on this.
So like most Yankee fans, i believe that if you are not going to win the World Series, I don't care if you win 84 games or 64, as long as I know they are improving.
My proposal is this:
For several season go with a Moneyball type system. Keep the payroll for the active roster around 80-100 million. Invest in players the A's invest in. Look really in depth for sabremetrics and at worst, you field an 80 win team hopefully, with room for more. If the A's can do it, why can't the Yankees with twice the budget?
Now for the radical idea: all that is good and well, but it's not really improving the Yankees for the long term, my next idea is a radical way to improve the farm system that I've never seen a team do before
It is to allocate over 100 million for signing big free agents. hanley, scherzer, lester, stanton eventually, really anyone who's a big FA. Then trade them all for top prospects but eat most of the salary. you don't see big players getting traded for top prospects unless they don't have a big contract or they have an expiring one, people don't want to lose prospects and take on a huge payroll. So don't let them. Say Scherzer is signed for 24 million a season. Eat 16 of that. And you are now shopping a Cy young winner for just 8 million dollars, the prospects you can get for him is probably baffling.
Do that for like 4 big free agents, land close to 10 top prospects, and mix prospects and moneyball for awhile until you can sign some big free agents or make some big trades have a little more financial stability.
Sure they will be paying well over 200 million a year and less than half of that for active players, but it's improving the team, no?
Thoughts on this.