Hoopguru
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2014
- Messages
- 22,351
- Likes
- 18,485
- Points
- 113
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So in May 2013, the Camden City Council officially approved resolutions to dissolve its police department. This did not mean policing stopped in Camden, however. Responsibilities were assumed by the newly established Camden County Police Department, which rehired many of the same officers.
The Camden police reform was—and remains—politically divisive. In part that was because union contracts were thrown out, leaving many on the force earning a lower salary and with fewer benefits. And it required very strange bedfellows to succeed—an all-powerful Democratic machine, a Republican governor, conservative budget-cutters and progressive police thinkers, all aligned to break an established department and start over.
Feel free to share the sources and quote the downsides.Thanks, you beat me to it Hoop...and as you probably already know, there are other sources as well. And there are reasons why other cities have not implemented Camden's experiment.
And while some of Camdens crimes have dropped a bit, others have rose.
Lol, shocking.lol...Oh I can provide links but why should I when they will simply and arbitrarily be dismissed/discounted.
Seen this movie too many times before.
How did any of that dispute anything anybody in here has said?Considering 10-15 years ago Camden's crime rate couldn't have gotten much worse, it tapered off but recently has kinda flat lined and some crimes are actually trending up...and Camden didn't exactly do things on their own...the state has bailed them out because they spent 4-5 times the revenue that they took in.
And again, there are reasons why more and more other cities have not adopted Camden's experiment in droves.
But yeah, gotta love people who choose to acknowledge only small portions of someone's post/link while not acknowledging the rest.
"Camden: A “Defund” Model? Not exactly"
...lol...shocking.
And what were they ranked before the changes we're discussing?
Thanks, you beat me to it Hoop...and as you probably already know, there are other sources as well. And there are reasons why other cities have not implemented Camden's experiment.
And while some of Camdens crimes have dropped a bit, others have risen.
But it's not really de-unionizing.
Suppose you were a freshwater underwater basket weaver and your union is the Teamsters. You work for them for 10 years and the company decides to close.
You hear the saltwater underwater basket weavers are hiring but their union is AFL-CIO.
Switching employers that have different unions is not de-unionizing.
In my humble opinion.
Camden is not a true model for all cities, for Camden maybe, but Camden was so bad that it probably couldn't get any worse and the drop in most crimes dropped nationwide during covid.
They really have not shown they can do it without help, and in their case, they simply used state aid instead of their own revenue to practically double the size of their police force, making Camden now one of the most "policed" cities in the country in proportion to their size.
Camden basically threw money at the problem...and spending 6 times the revenue that they take in is certainly a negative impact.
U.S. crime rate & statistics for 2021 was 6.81, a 6.02% increase from 2020.
U.S. crime rate & statistics for 2020 was 6.42, a 28.78% increase from 2019.
U.S. crime rate & statistics for 2019 was 4.99, a 1.14% increase from 2018.
U.S. crime rate & statistics for 2018 was 4.93, a 5.99% decline from 2017.
While initially they were not unionized, in 2013 they voted to unionize and selected the New Jersey Fraternal Order Of Police Union (NJFOP). All of the Camden County officers are covered by a police union and have been for a decade.But it's not really de-unionizing.
Suppose you were a freshwater underwater basket weaver and your union is the Teamsters. You work for them for 10 years and the company decides to close.
You hear the saltwater underwater basket weavers are hiring but their union is AFL-CIO.
Switching employers that have different unions is not de-unionizing.
In my humble opinion.
This is not something that can be solved by policing. Camden is the poorest city in the state, and has a poverty rate of 35.5%Camden has to bum money from the state to continue to excessively hire more cops because no businesses want to go there, and I don't blame them. After 13 years I would think that if things had improved that much, business would start opening there. But the fact is that even after 13 years, Camden is still ranked the 14th most dangerous place to be...not impressive.
But didn't they contend they would eventually re-unionize. Seems they were un unionized for some time as they got on a better track?But it's not really de-unionizing.
Suppose you were a freshwater underwater basket weaver and your union is the Teamsters. You work for them for 10 years and the company decides to close.
You hear the saltwater underwater basket weavers are hiring but their union is AFL-CIO.
Switching employers that have different unions is not de-unionizing.
In my humble opinion.
Are they bad? Yes. Are they significantly better? Also yes.Since the first days of the department’s operation, overall crime and violent crime have both been reduced to 50-year lows. At the end of last year, violent crime had been reduced by 44% and homicides had come down approximately 60% from the previous 10 years. Additionally, the city has seen a 62% decrease in shootings since 2012, the last full year of operation for the Camden City Police Department.
Military Policeman for 5 years. More garrison/civilian type street duty than field duty.Which is also cool, and I didn't know.
So reducing crime = bad? Cool stance....Still trying to put Camden in a positive light ?........a city using state money instead of their own to hire even more cops...if they keep this up, there will be more cops than citizens.
...even when compared to 2012, Camden is still a shit hole. ..."hey, now we're (Camden) only the 14th most dangerous place to be in the US !"
Still waiting for examples of the plethora of other cities lining up to attempt what Camden attempted to do...10-12 years after the fact.
I'm not finding any legit data that have Camden ranked as anywhere close to the most dangerous......Still trying to put Camden in a positive light ?........a city using state money instead of their own to hire even more cops...if they keep this up, there will be more cops than citizens.
...even when compared to 2012, Camden is still a shit hole. ..."hey, now we're (Camden) only the 14th most dangerous place to be in the US !"
Still waiting for examples of the plethora of other cities lining up to attempt what Camden attempted to do...10-12 years after the fact.
So reducing crime = bad? Cool stance.