OT ACAB All Cops Are Bastards (yes EVERY one)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
It was spread that the cops in the Uvalde shootings didn’t do shit because they were Mexicans and people didn’t care about Mexicans.

It wasn’t until people realized that Uvalde police is about 90% Latino(a) that the narrative shifted.

But I do think there is an inherent racism problem in this country. But I believe it’s in those peoples nature and they aren’t even aware of it
 
MickZagger said:
I don’t believe all cops are bad. I think cops are trigger happy though because we live in a crazy world and they just wanna do their job and go home to their families at night.

I do believe like any other profession there is shit cops out there. Just like there’s shit doctors, shit priests, etc..

There’s just a lot of shit people in this world unfortunately.
Click to expand...
Cops are in a bad system that trains them wrong and puts the good ones with bad partners who they have to trust their life to.

All cops aren't bad, but far too many cops certainly are.
 
Sounds like Paine Tablet needs an aspirin tablet.
 
Although I don't agree with the general language of @Paine Tablet I can relate to his pessimistic feelings toward hypocrisy and his attitude. Not speaking about anyone specific, but I definitely get lost in the woods and what is the truth and what I should focus my limited effort on. It can be very frustrating.
 
SlyPokerDog said:
Click to expand...


First off, 6 cops have this dude down. There was no need to shoot him to begin with. Second, how can a cop pull out her gun, fire it shooting her partner, and think it came from elsewhere? Then she kills the guy for good measure. Lock her ass up.
 
https://www.kcur.org/news/2020-05-2...feels-forced-out-apologizes-to-victims-mother

Maybe all of them aren't bastards.

Police officer Daniel Straub was forced to resign after he went against fellow officers accounts of a police involved shooting.

The police chased after a black man Ryan Stokes, after he was falsely accused by a drunk white man of stealing an Iphone.

Stokes was unarmed and decided to surrender. One of the officers who had caught up to him, William Thompson, shot him in the back.

The police at first gave the account that Stokes was a thief and he was armed. That he was pulling out his weapon and was thus shot.

Officer Straub testified in a lawsuit filed by Stokes mother that his fellow cops lied. Not only was Stokes was not armed and was no thief, he was shot without reason. The drunk white man found his phone by the way. Straub apologized to Stokes mother.

The other officers all gave depositions backing up their original claim and denouncing Straub. The case was dismissed but is under appeal.

Four years later Straub shit at a white man in a car who was trying to run him over. He was originally cleared, found to be protecting his life. But, the police department suddenly changed it's ruling and found him responsible. He was charged. The police union refused to defend him in court. He eventually pled to a misdemeanor, and was given community service, anger management, and gun training. His charge and conviction led his sergeant to recommend him being fired. He was forced to resign under the pressure. He hasn't found a police job since and is working as a warehouse manager. He stands by his account that Stokes was innocent and unarmed and that his fellow cops covered up for the officer who shot him.
 
Chris Craig said:
https://www.kcur.org/news/2020-05-2...feels-forced-out-apologizes-to-victims-mother

Maybe all of them aren't bastards.

Police officer Daniel Straub was forced to resign after he went against fellow officers accounts of a police involved shooting.

The police chased after a black man Ryan Stokes, after he was falsely accused by a drunk white man of stealing an Iphone.

Stokes was unarmed and decided to surrender. One of the officers who had caught up to him, William Thompson, shot him in the back.

The police at first gave the account that Stokes was a thief and he was armed. That he was pulling out his weapon and was thus shot.

Officer Straub testified in a lawsuit filed by Stokes mother that his fellow cops lied. Not only was Stokes was not armed and was no thief, he was shot without reason. The drunk white man found his phone by the way. Straub apologized to Stokes mother.

The other officers all gave depositions backing up their original claim and denouncing Straub. The case was dismissed but is under appeal.

Four years later Straub shit at a white man in a car who was trying to run him over. He was originally cleared, found to be protecting his life. But, the police department suddenly changed it's ruling and found him responsible. He was charged. The police union refused to defend him in court. He eventually pled to a misdemeanor, and was given community service, anger management, and gun training. His charge and conviction led his sergeant to recommend him being fired. He was forced to resign under the pressure. He hasn't found a police job since and is working as a warehouse manager. He stands by his account that Stokes was innocent and unarmed and that his fellow cops covered up for the officer who shot him.
Click to expand...

Wow that’s pretty fucked up, talk about injustice.
 
Chris Craig said:
https://www.kcur.org/news/2020-05-2...feels-forced-out-apologizes-to-victims-mother

Maybe all of them aren't bastards.

Police officer Daniel Straub was forced to resign after he went against fellow officers accounts of a police involved shooting.

The police chased after a black man Ryan Stokes, after he was falsely accused by a drunk white man of stealing an Iphone.

Stokes was unarmed and decided to surrender. One of the officers who had caught up to him, William Thompson, shot him in the back.

The police at first gave the account that Stokes was a thief and he was armed. That he was pulling out his weapon and was thus shot.

Officer Straub testified in a lawsuit filed by Stokes mother that his fellow cops lied. Not only was Stokes was not armed and was no thief, he was shot without reason. The drunk white man found his phone by the way. Straub apologized to Stokes mother.

The other officers all gave depositions backing up their original claim and denouncing Straub. The case was dismissed but is under appeal.

Four years later Straub shit at a white man in a car who was trying to run him over. He was originally cleared, found to be protecting his life. But, the police department suddenly changed it's ruling and found him responsible. He was charged. The police union refused to defend him in court. He eventually pled to a misdemeanor, and was given community service, anger management, and gun training. His charge and conviction led his sergeant to recommend him being fired. He was forced to resign under the pressure. He hasn't found a police job since and is working as a warehouse manager. He stands by his account that Stokes was innocent and unarmed and that his fellow cops covered up for the officer who shot him.
Click to expand...

Our justice system is corrupt as hell and people need to open their eyes. Most people don't realize it until it's biting them in the ass.
 
Chris Craig said:
https://www.kcur.org/news/2020-05-2...feels-forced-out-apologizes-to-victims-mother

Maybe all of them aren't bastards.

Police officer Daniel Straub was forced to resign after he went against fellow officers accounts of a police involved shooting.

The police chased after a black man Ryan Stokes, after he was falsely accused by a drunk white man of stealing an Iphone.

Stokes was unarmed and decided to surrender. One of the officers who had caught up to him, William Thompson, shot him in the back.

The police at first gave the account that Stokes was a thief and he was armed. That he was pulling out his weapon and was thus shot.

Officer Straub testified in a lawsuit filed by Stokes mother that his fellow cops lied. Not only was Stokes was not armed and was no thief, he was shot without reason. The drunk white man found his phone by the way. Straub apologized to Stokes mother.

The other officers all gave depositions backing up their original claim and denouncing Straub. The case was dismissed but is under appeal.

Four years later Straub shit at a white man in a car who was trying to run him over. He was originally cleared, found to be protecting his life. But, the police department suddenly changed it's ruling and found him responsible. He was charged. The police union refused to defend him in court. He eventually pled to a misdemeanor, and was given community service, anger management, and gun training. His charge and conviction led his sergeant to recommend him being fired. He was forced to resign under the pressure. He hasn't found a police job since and is working as a warehouse manager. He stands by his account that Stokes was innocent and unarmed and that his fellow cops covered up for the officer who shot him.
Click to expand...
This is why ACAB is so close to being true. The ones who aren't are gotten rid of.
 
Phatguysrule said:
You should delete the last sentence. You're better than that.
Click to expand...
Not until white police officers prove they are better than that. I am sick and tired of these entitled idiots making the rest of us look bad. You're a fan of statistics and numbers in general. Prove to me that white cops are a minority when it comes to this kind of shit. And I don't buy that it's because the minority of cops are white......
 
UncleCliffy'sDaddy said:
Not until white police officers prove they are better than that. I am sick and tired of these entitled idiots making the rest of us look bad. You're a fan of statistics and numbers in general. Prove to me that white cops are a minority when it comes to this kind of shit. And I don't buy that it's because the minority of cops are white......
Click to expand...
The color of their skin has nothing to do with the way they are acting.

The idea that it does is racist. Omitting somebody from a position because of the color of their skin would be unconstitutional, and we don't want that changed.
 
Phatguysrule said:
The color of their skin has nothing to do with the way they are acting.

The idea that it does is racist. Omitting somebody from a position because of the color of their skin would be unconstitutional, and we don't want that changed.
Click to expand...

Uh..........Hello? That is EXACTLY what we have been doing since the Constitution was written.........just pointing out the obvious.
 
Phatguysrule said:
You should delete the last sentence. You're better than that.
Click to expand...

Phatguysrule said:
The color of their skin has nothing to do with the way they are acting.

The idea that it does is racist. Omitting somebody from a position because of the color of their skin would be unconstitutional, and we don't want that changed.
Click to expand...

The sooner we stop generalizing and painting with a broad brush, the sooner we can isolate the true problems and solve them.
Until then its just finger pointing of racism and reverse racism.
We are better than generalizing. i know several white cops that are good at thier job, have no racist tendancies and are ashamed of the bulk of their peers.
 
Phatguysrule said:
And we should be focusing on limiting that rather than expanding it.
Click to expand...
I thought that was what we were trying to do. Especially since George Floyd. Pick up a newspaper (Metaphorically speaking). Any newspaper. It hasn't been working worth a shit and only seems to get worse. The incident above that sparked this exchange is one more example in a never ending list.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top