OT "Act like big boys"/"Eat a bag of dicks" argument

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
dviss1

dviss1

Emcee Referee
Joined
Aug 10, 2011
Messages
29,649
Likes
27,585
Points
113
calvin natt said:
Because
1) the mere perception that it’s Kerr and Bobs fault is ridiculous. DG and KD had an on court issue they carrier over to locker rooms and the team
2) DG has been a pain in the ass to coach and manage since day one but they put up with it because he’s good. But not fun to deal with, at all
3) it’s been two years
4) they knew before this blow up that KD was 50/50 leaving and wasn’t loving playing with DG. So when this happened KD was really pissed. To show him they had his back they punished DG.
5) they say they wanted to have a team meeting and get it on the table and regret not doing so. Why didn’t they just do that like big boys
Click to expand...

First off, stop calling grown black men Boys. Let's just end that practice for the rest of your life.

Secondly, They should've let Draymond and KD handle it. Saying "you are forced to apologize" is some bullshit. They weren't saying KD needed to apologize. They didn't look at the situation holistically. KD was JUST as much at fault for the argument as DG was and to only go to DG and say apologize means they didn't know WTF was going on but tried to control the situation when really, they just needed to get them both in a room...

Then leave...

They'd still have KD if they did that.
 
dviss1 said:
We want CJ traded. We want him traded for a PF who can do multiple things. Ultimately, I want Pascal Siakam. I'd take him over both Draymond and Simmons. I do NOT want Simmons and his headcase, primadonna personality. Draymond is a champion. He won a championship without Durant. Simmons will never sniff a championship and needs a psychologist to shoot... Between the two I choose Draymond, warts and all.

He's a much better fit that Simmons IMO.
Click to expand...
i don't even know where to begin with this antiquated and baseless logic. don't feel like engaging today.

you have your opinions, i have mine.

dviss1 said:
First off, stop calling grown black men Boys. Let's just end that practice for the rest of your life.
Click to expand...
oh jesus, this shit again. nothing @calvin natt said had ANY racial undertones.
 
illmatic99 said:
i don't even know where to begin with this antiquated and baseless logic. don't feel like engaging today.

you have your opinions, i have mine.


oh jesus, this shit again. nothing @calvin natt said had ANY racial undertones.
Click to expand...

Doesn't matter. Never call black men boys. No one said he had any undertones.
 
Natebishop3 said:
LOL always playing the angry man. It was nice while you were gone.

"Blah blah blah I'm a referee on a small ass stage so I know everything!" blah blah blah

Maybe if I ref a bunch of 12 year olds I could come from a point of authority as well????
Click to expand...

I never care what people think who don't know me. Your personal attacks are sophomoric...
 
illmatic99 said:
not sure what you remember of this forum, but posting this kinda stuff isn't acceptable.
Click to expand...

It's acceptable for him to "tell me whatever the fuck he's gonna tell me?" Fuck him..
 
dviss1 said:
It's acceptable for him to "tell me whatever the fuck he's gonna tell me?" Fuck him..
Click to expand...

Except that wasn't a personal attack. That was a statement. If you're not understanding my point, I'm going to tell you that you're not understanding my point. Which was clearly illustrated by you not addressing what I was actually saying.
 
Natebishop3 said:
Except that wasn't a personal attack. That was a statement. If you're not understanding my point, I'm going to tell you that you're not understanding my point. Which was clearly illustrated by you not addressing what I was actually saying.
Click to expand...

Telling you to eat a dick isn't an attack either. You could easily say no I'm not interested in that particular pastime.

Also, telling someone not to call black men boys says NOTHING about why they said it, just that they shouldn't....

I guess Green should've stayed in his place during his "You need to apologize" meeting...
 
dviss1 said:
First off, stop calling grown black men Boys. Let's just end that practice for the rest of your life.

Secondly, They should've let Draymond and KD handle it. Saying "you are forced to apologize" is some bullshit. They weren't saying KD needed to apologize. They didn't look at the situation holistically. KD was JUST as much at fault for the argument as DG was and to only go to DG and say apologize means they didn't know WTF was going on but tried to control the situation when really, they just needed to get them both in a room...

Then leave...

They'd still have KD if they did that.
Click to expand...
God. You know damn well “big boys” was not used in the context of “boy”.
 
calvin natt said:
God. You know damn well “big boys” was not used in the context of “boy”.
Click to expand...

Dude. It's just a full stop. It doesn't matter what context you use it in. You don't have to have any undertones or anything.

Just full stop on referring to us as boys. You wouldn't say that to a black man's face so why say it here? It's not that hard...
 
calvin natt said:
God. You know damn well “big boys” was not used in the context of “boy”.
Click to expand...

He knows. He explained. He doesn't feel the word boys should ever be used when describing black men which is understandable.
 
dviss1 said:
Dude. It's just a full stop. It doesn't matter what context you use it in. You don't have to have any undertones or anything.

Just full stop on referring to us as boys. You wouldn't say that to a black man's face so why say it here? It's not that hard...
Click to expand...

I get what you're saying. He wasn't even trying to go there.
 
dviss1 said:
Telling you to eat a dick isn't an attack either. You could easily say no I'm not interested in that particular pastime.

Also, telling someone not to call black men boys says NOTHING about why they said it, just that they shouldn't....

I guess Green should've stayed in his place during his "You need to apologize" meeting...
Click to expand...
Dang. Super annoying. Not surprising but annoying
 
dviss1 said:
Dude. It's just a full stop. It doesn't matter what context you use it in. You don't have to have any undertones or anything.

Just full stop on referring to us as boys. You wouldn't say that to a black man's face so why say it here? It's not that hard...
Click to expand...
It never crossed my mind that you can’t use the sarcastic term “time to be big boys and grow up” because somehow it’s the same as the racist “boy”. Anyway. Carry on.
 
calvin natt said:
It never crossed my mind that you can’t use the sarcastic term “time to be big boys and grow up” because somehow it’s the same as the racist “boy”. Anyway. Carry on.
Click to expand...

We all have to decolonize our minds. Jussayin, It doesn't matter the context. We literally had to die to be called man in this country and folks still refer to us as boys. Just take the medicine bro. I know it's nasty.
 
dviss1 said:
Dude. It's just a full stop. It doesn't matter what context you use it in. You don't have to have any undertones or anything.

Just full stop on referring to us as boys. You wouldn't say that to a black man's face so why say it here? It's not that hard...
Click to expand...

So should he have said big kids? big children? big males? What is your preferred phrasing for the alternative to adolescent men?
 
dviss1 said:
We all have to decolonize our minds. Jussayin, It doesn't matter the context. We literally had to die to be called man in this country and folks still refer to us as boys. Just take the medicine bro. I know it's nasty.
Click to expand...
lol wut. legitimately has me laughing how you derailed your own thread with this stuff.

You think @calvin natt has to change his mindset because he harmlessly used "boys" with no racial context whatsoever, but you are constantly undermining a guy for seeing a psychologist, and then telling a fellow poster to "eat dicks?" isn't that homophobic?

what?
 
dviss1 said:
Dude. It's just a full stop. It doesn't matter what context you use it in. You don't have to have any undertones or anything.

Just full stop on referring to us as boys. You wouldn't say that to a black man's face so why say it here? It's not that hard...
Click to expand...

If I tell: "Hey, boys, who wants a pint?!" in any pub in London, you would be probably the only one offended. Just sayin;)
 
calvin natt said:
It never crossed my mind that you can’t use the sarcastic term “time to be big boys and grow up” because somehow it’s the same as the racist “boy”. Anyway. Carry on.
Click to expand...
Also the age of players in the NBA seems to invite the term a bit. 19-21 year old young men in many instances called "boys". Someone might say it with absolutely no intention other than to say they were young. I agree with him in a way though. Full stop might be best. I probably will not use the term after reading it that way.
 
illmatic99 said:
lol wut. legitimately has me laughing how you derailed your own thread with this stuff.

You think @calvin natt has to change his mindset because he harmlessly used "boys" with no racial context whatsoever, but you are constantly undermining a guy for seeing a psychologist, and then telling a fellow poster to "eat dicks?" isn't that homophobic?

what?
Click to expand...

The guy who needs to see a psychologist because he can't shoot is not the one I want on my team. :dunno:

Not calling black men boys is apparently a hard thing for some people... I don't ever use the term "white boy" because I know I don't want to be called boy... It's not that hard.

Homophobic... What a huge reach. GTFO with that.
 
dviss1 said:
The guy who needs to see a psychologist because he can't shoot is not the one I want on my team. :dunno:

Not calling black men boys is apparently a hard thing for some people... I don't ever use the term "white boy" because I know I don't want to be called boy... It's not that hard.

Homophobic... What a huge reach. GTFO with that.
Click to expand...

That's rich. You want someone to basically stop using the word boy across the board because it has been used as a racial attack, but someone tells you that saying "eat a bag of dicks" is homophobic and you say to "GTFO with that."

El oh el.
 
dviss1 said:
The guy who needs to see a psychologist because he can't shoot is not the one I want on my team. :dunno:

Not calling black men boys is apparently a hard thing for some people... I don't ever use the term "white boy" because I know I don't want to be called boy... It's not that hard.

Homophobic... What a huge reach. GTFO with that.
Click to expand...
“Huge reach” ha that’s rich
 
dviss1 said:
The guy who needs to see a psychologist because he can't shoot is not the one I want on my team. :dunno:

Not calling black men boys is apparently a hard thing for some people... I don't ever use the term "white boy" because I know I don't want to be called boy... It's not that hard.

Homophobic... What a huge reach. GTFO with that.
Click to expand...
The concept of irony is wasted on you.
 
Natebishop3 said:
That's rich. You want someone to basically stop using the word boy across the board because it has been used as a racial attack, but someone tells you that saying "eat a bag of dicks" is homophobic and you say to "GTFO with that."

El oh el.
Click to expand...

Because it isn't.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top