Adam Silver is a moron

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Shooter

Unanimously Great
Joined
Oct 10, 2008
Messages
5,484
Likes
152
Points
63
I would love to see Lillard named an All-Star, but this idea of expanding the roster to avoid such difficult choices is ridiculous. Life is full of difficult choices. So what? What's the next step, expanding the All-Star roster to 50 so no one gets his feelings hurt?

Leave the roster where it is, for God's sake. Let's let Lillard get so good that he beats out another great player and makes that guy watch the game on TV.
 
he said on ESPN radio that the one thing he's gonna remember the most from his first year at the top, is having to pick between DC and DL - rather odd considering all the drama with Atlanta and Donald Sterling....

as you say, he did mention on the radio show about possibly expanding the roster limit to 13 or 15, which, like you, i think is a rather shit idea. Fix the dunk contest before you touch the main dance. I'm not sure what it is, but all the recent Allstar games/weekends in recent memory have just ultimately turned into a fading memory of forgetability. is that a word? if no, im claiming it....

what they used to do here for trials for All Black rugby selection, was have 2 teams called the Probables and the Possibles, which was basically the shadow team vs. the ones on the bubble. Those games were always fuckin serious, you're actually playing for something beyond the game - i guess its similar to how they run Team USA basketball, but i think there is an angle in there somewhere, although its gonna be hard to get away from the East/West thing.

Players Choice could be interesting - and if they get picked for both games, they chose which - voted by the fans n coaches, or voted by your peers.

i dont fuckin know, but what i do know is the ASG is weak as shit these days, and more players on the roster aint gonna help it.
 
I disagree. The all-star roster is not representative of an NBA roster. Adding 1 more player would match what regular NBA rosters have. I say do it. That way the All-Star game would risk less injuries by playing the players less minutes. Also, more players would reach economic incentives to make the team.
 
Expanding the rosters under the current format is dumb because nonstarters only get spot minutes as it is. If they want to expand the number of players, they ought to dump all of the stupid contests on Saturday and go to a 4 team 2-day tournament format. That could be fun to watch.
 
First, abolish conferences. Seriously, Eastern/Western Conference has to go, because the Shite Conference is ruining it for the Great Conference. Then, eliminate fan voting (it's way down anyway now that there are no Chinese players in Houston).

The problem then solves itself.

Make 30 spots, for the Top 30 players across the league. Then have a two-team draft where the best head coach drafts, then the second best.
 
If all 12 spots were selected by fan vote, Lillard would've made it. He was 5th among West guards, ahead of Thompson and Westbrook.
 
If all 12 spots were selected by fan vote, Lillard would've made it. He was 5th among West guards, ahead of Thompson and Westbrook.

That'd still be a horrible idea. lol.
 
You want someone to feel genuinely sleighted, make it like the old inactive roster. Pick 15 players for each team and have the all-star coach choose his 12-man active roster before the game.
 
Clearly Silver never wanted any part of this decision. Let's say that on the court Dame & Cousins are equal (I won't concede that but for sake of argument), as a commissioner it comes down to things like corporate sponsorship & player marketability, right? . . . who's got the shoe contract? Who has the better image and represents the league well vs who is the TWO time defending league leader in tech fouls? Who's more entertaining to watch? This IS an exhibition game for entertainment. It was puzzling in light of that how Cousins gets the nod over Dame BEFORE Silver's comments about why he made the decision. Dame smokes Cousins all day when it comes to the promotional side & because politics are always a part of things like this the thinking is how much better would Cousins have to be ON the court than Dame to make up for that in this case? And, how much better COULD Cousins possibly be on the court vs a guy who was on just about everybody's ballot of top 10 MVP candidates a few weeks ago?!! But it all made sense when Silver spilled the beans. Knowing there would be outcry either way, he hid behind the value he puts in the coaches input. After all, he's just the "3rd tier". If that's the case, why does the commissioner even make this selection? Why not just let the coaches pick the injury alternate? Gutless.

I could care less about the actual All Star GAME but I do care about the Trailblazer brand, which I think Dame has done more to enhance in 3 years than any player we've ever had (he hasn't done it by himself, no doubt). His Adidas signature shoe, the "D Lillard 1" launches Feb. 6th & they had a special colorway that was to be unveiled at the All Star game. Having worked for a major shoe company, I can tell you that's a big deal. Kids watch that game just to see who's wearing what shoe in what colorway. It's a huge swing & miss for Adidas & a blown opportunity for Dame & the Trailblazers to show the world that a superstar can thrive in a smaller market like Portland.
 
You want someone to feel genuinely sleighted, make it like the old inactive roster. Pick 15 players for each team and have the all-star coach choose his 12-man active roster before the game.

How about if your team isn't in the playoffs you don't get a spot? KD, Westbrook, AD and Cousins spots could've been awarded to more deserving players on teams that actually have a shot. If that were the case we could've went with Dame, Ellis, Dirk and Z-Bo/Conley
 
The league could try a draft like the NFL has done. To qualify, the player has to be in a top ten stat list.
 
First, abolish conferences. Seriously, Eastern/Western Conference has to go, because the Shite Conference is ruining it for the Great Conference. Then, eliminate fan voting (it's way down anyway now that there are no Chinese players in Houston).

The problem then solves itself.

Make 30 spots, for the Top 30 players across the league. Then have a two-team draft where the best head coach drafts, then the second best.

>I was thinking along the same lines with a top stat list as a parameter. So, for instance if Dame was #6 in assists he would be in.
 
Before Coach K took over the U.S. Team, they chose the players in advance, without tryouts. Having them compete for the job greatly improved the U.S. Team.

For the All-Star Team, they should bring in all 450 NBA players and make them try out.
 
How about having the allstar game at the end of the season instead of the middle so you have a better assesment of players contributions on the court? Just take a break in the middle and let them all go to Cancun
 
How about if your team isn't in the playoffs you don't get a spot? KD, Westbrook, AD and Cousins spots could've been awarded to more deserving players on teams that actually have a shot. If that were the case we could've went with Dame, Ellis, Dirk and Z-Bo/Conley

That's a team measure, not an individual one. I get what you're saying, but it's not what all-star games in any sport are about. If anyone has a gripe along those lines, it's Tony Parker. I think he's only made it something like 25% of the years he's been in the league. Unselfish, consistent play is great for teams but not so good for all-star consideration.
 
I have to say the Blazer forum is absolutely unique and sharpens free thought... The Ravens forum is ok but testosterone floods the place.
 
I have no idea what this is about. Silver has been nothing short of perfect during his short tenure. Easily the best commissioner of the major sports.
 
I have no idea what this is about. Silver has been nothing short of perfect during his short tenure. Easily the best commissioner of the major sports.

Yes. This change in personality reminds me of the change in CEO from Steve Jobs to Tim Cook at Apple. Firstly, less smarmy. Secondly, more interested in process, fairness, and social justice. All of these are nice.
 
I have no idea what this is about. Silver has been nothing short of perfect during his short tenure. Easily the best commissioner of the major sports.

>You are right. No NFL controversy traits.
 
he said on ESPN radio that the one thing he's gonna remember the most from his first year at the top, is having to pick between DC and DL - rather odd considering all the drama with Atlanta and Donald Sterling....

I have no idea what this is about. Silver has been nothing short of perfect during his short tenure. Easily the best commissioner of the major sports.

Every NBA news site had an article in which Silver said that he plans to permanently expand All-Star game rosters. His reason is that it is too hard for him to decide on injury replacements (e.g. David Lee vs. Demarcus Cousins). But if the teams are enlarged, he'll still have such decisions. So his idea is stupid. I'm not critical of anything else he's done, and in fact, he hasn't done this yet. So far it's just talk, and I hope it stays there.
 
As a flamboyant, not at all subtle, gay man, Silver will eventually be outed in the public conversation (message boards). If I were his PR advisor, I'd tell him to come out now, while his popularity is high. The honeymoon will end when he makes some mistake (e.g. a plastic ball, ads on jerseys, a new CBA lockout) and people hit him while he's down. He should choose the time to come out himself, instead of letting his future opponents choose the time. The best time is now.

For the same reason, Obama pushed health care through in his first year. 9/11 "just happened" to occur in Bush's first year, allowing him almost his full term to continue his father's war before a successor could dissolve it.

Silver should strike while the iron's hot and out himself during his honeymoon period. Manage by tamping down anticipated problems, instead of waiting for them to ignite and then stomping out fires.
 
Every NBA news site had an article in which Silver said that he plans to permanently expand All-Star game rosters. His reason is that it is too hard for him to decide on injury replacements (e.g. David Lee vs. Demarcus Cousins). But if the teams are enlarged, he'll still have such decisions. So his idea is stupid. I'm not critical of anything else he's done, and in fact, he hasn't done this yet. So far it's just talk, and I hope it stays there.


To a certain extent this is true. Even with expansion, someone will always get snubbed. But there's a difference between guys like Monta Ellis or Mike Conley not getting in vs. Lillard. Dame is on the precipice of superstardom (signature shoe, Footlocker commercials, etc.) Guys like that are automatic All Stars. Many have said this is the "mother" of all snubbings. If they do expand the rosters, it may be called the "Damian Lillard Rule". That's how it far reaching this controversy has become. In 2010/11 LA was 21/9 at the break & considered the biggest snub, while Tim Duncan was voted in by coaches even though he was 13/9 (How many "life time achievement" all star games does Timmy get to play in by the way?) It was frustrating, but not shocking. LA never branded himself like Dame does - not many do, and his game isn't as flashy. Expansion isn't the answer. I've seen several good ideas, just in this thread alone. Find a way to get the 24 most deserving players in the game & put a cap on the number of games a player can miss due to injury and still be eligible to play.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top