MARIS61
Real American
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2008
- Messages
- 28,007
- Likes
- 5,012
- Points
- 113
Well played.![]()
Just so nobody thinks I meant Babbitt, I meant Maurice Lucas.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well played.![]()
Just so nobody thinks I meant Babbitt, I meant Maurice Lucas.
Well it's not like he's in rebounding position when he's shooting those 18' jumpers.
Well, I suppose. Because he's over doubling Lillard. But he has a clear path to the hoop to get the rebound - once he sees Lillard passing the ball he's hedging back towards the hoop.and neither is the opponent's best Bigs defender, who is also likely their best rebounder.
and neither is the opponent's best Bigs defender, who is also likely their best rebounder.
What happens when the cat is away?
STOMP
Last year LMA shot 510 shots from 16' to 23', (6.9 per game) making 41.8% of them. The next highest total was Demar DeRozan (457, or 5.6 per game) and then Steph Curry and K*be at 384 (5.0 per game).
So even if LMA just maintained being as voluminous a chucker as Steph/K*be/DeRozan, and took those extra 2 shots per game from 3pt land instead of where he does, he would only have to shoot 27.9% on them to be more effective (and help the team more). If he was at, say, 33% instead of 28%, then he scores 30+ more per year (about half a point per game). And that's IF HE STILL CHUCKS AS MUCH AS K*BE AND STEPH CURRY!
Now, LMA isn't the only big who likes the long jumper. KG, Bosh, Melo, Horford and Scola are all in the 300's (about 4 shots per game) from there. But they all shoot better than LMA does. KG and Scola shoot 45 and 46%. Bosh shoots 52% on his mid-range shots. If LMA was able to curtail his 16-23' to KG/Bosh levels, and mix 2 more shots inside and 2 outside, it would be great. Assuming his career percentages (and adding in a 34% 3pt%, which personally I think is low), he would trade 7 16'-23' shots per game with a 41.8% clip (netting 5.8 ppg, on average) for 2 shots 0-15 feet (53.6%), 3 (16'-23') at 41.8%, and 2 3pters at 34%, those 7 shots would go up to 6.8 ppg. I'm not talking about turning him into a low post player, or getting any better at shooting than he already is. If he just took a step back twice a game, and a step in twice a game, he (and therefore, the Blazers) score 0.9 ppg more.
Last year LMA shot 510 shots from 16' to 23', (6.9 per game) making 41.8% of them. The next highest total was Demar DeRozan (457, or 5.6 per game) and then Steph Curry and K*be at 384 (5.0 per game).
So even if LMA just maintained being as voluminous a chucker as Steph/K*be/DeRozan, and took those extra 2 shots per game from 3pt land instead of where he does, he would only have to shoot 27.9% on them to be more effective (and help the team more). If he was at, say, 33% instead of 28%, then he scores 30+ more per year (about half a point per game). And that's IF HE STILL CHUCKS AS MUCH AS K*BE AND STEPH CURRY!
Now, LMA isn't the only big who likes the long jumper. KG, Bosh, Melo, Horford and Scola are all in the 300's (about 4 shots per game) from there. But they all shoot better than LMA does. KG and Scola shoot 45 and 46%. Bosh shoots 52% on his mid-range shots. If LMA was able to curtail his 16-23' to KG/Bosh levels, and mix 2 more shots inside and 2 outside, it would be great. Assuming his career percentages (and adding in a 34% 3pt%, which personally I think is low), he would trade 7 16'-23' shots per game with a 41.8% clip (netting 5.8 ppg, on average) for 2 shots 0-15 feet (53.6%), 3 (16'-23') at 41.8%, and 2 3pters at 34%, those 7 shots would go up to 6.8 ppg. I'm not talking about turning him into a low post player, or getting any better at shooting than he already is. If he just took a step back twice a game, and a step in twice a game, he (and therefore, the Blazers) score 0.9 ppg more.
Yes. By a shot and a half a game over DeRozan, 2 over K*be/Steph, and 3 shots per game over guys like KG/Bosh/Melo/Horford/Scola
Are you starting to understand why I dislike him as a player so much?That's fucked up.
No, seriously.... that's fucked up.
Are you starting to understand why I dislike him as a player so much?
Also, for some added color, Rondo shot 48% from that range. Rajon Rondo. The guy that everyone thinks of as a poor shooter.
When sorted for FG% from that range you have to go THREE PAGES DEEP before you find LMA - I believe he ranks #100 (after you exclude players playing <15mpg):
http://www.hoopdata.com/shotstats.aspx?team=%&type=pg&posi=%&yr=2013&gp2=20&mins=15
Oh, okay. Rats, I thought we had a convert!Hey, I've been in favor of trading him.

Last year LMA shot 510 shots from 16' to 23', (6.9 per game) making 41.8% of them. The next highest total was Demar DeRozan (457, or 5.6 per game) and then Steph Curry and K*be at 384 (5.0 per game).
So even if LMA just maintained being as voluminous a chucker as Steph/K*be/DeRozan, and took those extra 2 shots per game from 3pt land instead of where he does, he would only have to shoot 27.9% on them to be more effective (and help the team more). If he was at, say, 33% instead of 28%, then he scores 30+ more per year (about half a point per game). And that's IF HE STILL CHUCKS AS MUCH AS K*BE AND STEPH CURRY!
Now, LMA isn't the only big who likes the long jumper. KG, Bosh, Melo, Horford and Scola are all in the 300's (about 4 shots per game) from there. But they all shoot better than LMA does. KG and Scola shoot 45 and 46%. Bosh shoots 52% on his mid-range shots. If LMA was able to curtail his 16-23' to KG/Bosh levels, and mix 2 more shots inside and 2 outside, it would be great. Assuming his career percentages (and adding in a 34% 3pt%, which personally I think is low), he would trade 7 16'-23' shots per game with a 41.8% clip (netting 5.8 ppg, on average) for 2 shots 0-15 feet (53.6%), 3 (16'-23') at 41.8%, and 2 3pters at 34%, those 7 shots would go up to 6.8 ppg. I'm not talking about turning him into a low post player, or getting any better at shooting than he already is. If he just took a step back twice a game, and a step in twice a game, he (and therefore, the Blazers) score 0.9 ppg more.
I'm curious to see 12'-13' vs 11'-12'. I wonder how much of Stotts' system has to do with it.
Last year LMA shot 510 shots from 16' to 23', (6.9 per game) making 41.8% of them. The next highest total was Demar DeRozan (457, or 5.6 per game) and then Steph Curry and K*be at 384 (5.0 per game).
So even if LMA just maintained being as voluminous a chucker as Steph/K*be/DeRozan, and took those extra 2 shots per game from 3pt land instead of where he does, he would only have to shoot 27.9% on them to be more effective (and help the team more). If he was at, say, 33% instead of 28%, then he scores 30+ more per year (about half a point per game). And that's IF HE STILL CHUCKS AS MUCH AS K*BE AND STEPH CURRY!
Now, LMA isn't the only big who likes the long jumper. KG, Bosh, Melo, Horford and Scola are all in the 300's (about 4 shots per game) from there. But they all shoot better than LMA does. KG and Scola shoot 45 and 46%. Bosh shoots 52% on his mid-range shots. If LMA was able to curtail his 16-23' to KG/Bosh levels, and mix 2 more shots inside and 2 outside, it would be great. Assuming his career percentages (and adding in a 34% 3pt%, which personally I think is low), he would trade 7 16'-23' shots per game with a 41.8% clip (netting 5.8 ppg, on average) for 2 shots 0-15 feet (53.6%), 3 (16'-23') at 41.8%, and 2 3pters at 34%, those 7 shots would go up to 6.8 ppg. I'm not talking about turning him into a low post player, or getting any better at shooting than he already is. If he just took a step back twice a game, and a step in twice a game, he (and therefore, the Blazers) score 0.9 ppg more.
I don't believe that's the case. In all the games I watch he's generally wide open when shooting those shots. Those shots generally come about after LMA sets a screen for Lillard, and Lillard pulls a double-team resulting in LMA being wide open at the top of the key. Rarely is he shooting contested shots from that range.Interesting analysis. The problem however is that he is taking more CONTESTED shots from that range than the other players which is why his efficiency is so low. He's posting up a godawful distance from the basket.
I'm not positive this is what you were asking for, but let me know if it's not:
His percentages have been remarkably consistent--setting aside his rookie year, he's been between 40.3% and 42.8% every year in his career. Even his rookie year was 39%. He's not getting better, or worse.
Attempts by year:
2006-7 147 (3.0/game)
2007-8 357 (4.7/game)
2008-9 436 (5.4/game)
2009-10 369 (4.7/game)
2010-11 339 (4.4/game)
2011-12 304 (5.6/game)
2012-13 510 (6.9/game)
The more shot attempts last season seemed like many variables.
We had zero bench, no one to demand the double and the pace was much faster than the Nate years.
So let me get this straight.... LMA shot the most jumpers from 16-23' in the league?
well yeah, of course he did. Again he was among the league leaders in minutes played and he's the main option on a team that needs him on the High Post as they've no other decent options to give them proper spacing. 16-23' jumpers are the shots that High Post players take. With a rookie PG being the only off the dribble threat, PDX really struggled to get good open looks. While it would be awesome if LA could be a lot better and maybe jump over his man and dunk from the 3 point line (ideally while doing a flip) or back down the world on the low block, it remains a positive that he can get off a reasonable jumper on just about any single coverage as the clock winds down.
It appears again that he's their only real High Post option. I've pined for one to be added to allow LA to shine on the low block again but oh well...
STOMP
That just really surprised me. He was #1 by a large margin. I would have figured it would be a guard.
I'm surprised you're surprised by that. Guards don't play a mid-range game anymore. It's all deep 3's or drives to the hoop. Mid-range shooters are mostly high post bigs now.
WTH is Minny doing giving 700 16'-23' shots to Dante Cunningham (39%) and Luke Ridnour (45%)?
My impression as well.I don't think that had as much to do with it as our new system under Stotts. It was pretty obvious that the coach was trying to make him into Dirk light.
