ALDRIDGE SIGNED! (merged)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Re: Aldrigde and Blazers reach agreement

LOL

No, not you DC.. I meant MM.

Fez tries to be a smart-ass, and MM calls him out in typical MM fashion.

Just good stuff this morning for a bored IT guy.




I'm so happy I finally have a typical style. I hope it's GQ grunge, that's what I was going for.
 
Re: ALDRIDGE SIGNED!

would you want to take the chance on a team offering aldridge the max?

Sure. I don't think there's any real chance that a team would do that.

Ed O.
 
Re: ALDRIDGE SIGNED!

I'd say there would have been a great chance for a team like NJ to offer him just as much if not more next offseason. He would have been a great fit there, and they probably would have known they weren't getting one of the top free agents, and went after him hard.
 
Re: ALDRIDGE SIGNED!

What team would make an offer that large to a restricted agent? I don't think there's a very big chance that any team would.

Further, with the cap going down, I doubt there will be enough teams far enough under the cap to make massive offers. The NBA is projecting a cap of $53.6m... assuming that's what it will be (and they gave that as the upper limit of the range), then I see nine teams (maximum) that could offer $10m or so in the first year... and that includes teams like the Clippers, Kings and MN that would have little to no interest in spending that much on Aldridge.

Ed O.

I said if LMA plays the way I hope he does this season. That would be a stat line of 22+ ppg, 8+ rpb, 1.5 blks, 3 apg on nearly 50% shooting.

A player who put up those numbers would most assuredly get paid.

I never said it was likely but it most certainly is possible.
 
The other thread title is the one that should still be in the forum. Aldridge is not signed yet.
 
The other thread title is the one that should still be in the forum. Aldridge is not signed yet.

The first post makes it clear that it's an agreement, not a signing.

Keeping a whole other thread open on the basis of "agreement" vs. "signed" is fucking stupid.

Ed O.
 
The first post makes it clear that it's an agreement, not a signing.

Keeping a whole other thread open on the basis of "agreement" vs. "signed" is fucking stupid.

Ed O.




I agree. I just think the thread title of the other one is much more accurate.


It would be like me starting a thread stating "McMillan no longer coach of the Blazers"

Whether that's in a year, or 10 years, it will at some point.
 
I recall a candid quote from LA at the start of the summer saying that Brandon deserved the full max and his camp would be satisfied with a bit less.

STOMP

What people say publicly is often different than what goes on behind closed doors... this is not breaking news.
 
Re: ALDRIDGE SIGNED!

That's right! You brought this up at the M&G. Congrats.

I know. first question asked KP. His reaction was hilarious but I tried to phrase it in a way he could answer. I didn't ask him if he was going to sign LMA, all I asked him is if he thought I had made a good bet. Good times...
 
Re: ALDRIDGE SIGNED!

Please don't assign me an opinion. In my post, I stated no opinion; I was just pointing out some facts in case people didn't know. It is my opinion that LaMarcus is a better player than West, offensively and defensively.
where did i assign someone an opinion?
 
I am very happy Aldridge is signed, it was one of my biggest concerns heading into the year. As most of you have seen the last few games, if our big gunz aren't in the game, it gets real ugly fast. Like 2 years ago Blazers ugly. Aldridge helped dig us out of those nightmare years and deserved this extension very much.
 
When did he sign?


He has only agreed to this point, correct? I know he will sign, but I was just wondering if I had missed it or something?
 
Re: ALDRIDGE SIGNED!

where did i assign someone an opinion?

Your question in response to my post appeared to be assuming that I thought Aldridge did not deserve this contract since his and David Wests numbers were almost identical. If I misinterpreted, my bad. I just wanted my opinion to be clear. :cheers:
 
Who gives a shit? They agreed. What difference does i tmake if his name has been inked on paper. Jet, is that you?
 
I hate to keep bringing this up, but when did he sign?

What a wonderful signing. Signings are awesome. It's so great to get Lamarcus signed, and signed even. I love a good signing. Signing. Signing. Signing. Now that he's signed we don't need to worry about him signing, or signing for that matter, because he's already signed.
 
Who gives a shit? They agreed. What difference does i tmake if his name has been inked on paper. Jet, is that you?



It's a pretty big difference.


One means either party can technically back out for any reason whatsoever.

The other means he is signed.


You take a car for a test drive with the intention of buying it, but get in a wreck on the test drive. You don't have to buy that car.

You sign your name for the car, and drive it off the lot and crash the car, it is your car.


You are standing at the altar in front of God and everyone and you fiance doesn't show up. You don't have to give her half of your stuff.

You get married, have sex with the maid of honor and your wife divorces you. You have to give her half your stuff.


You go through 4 years of high school with straight A's and leave 1 credit short of graduating. You go to a Junior college.

You graduate from high school with stright A's and you go to Stanford.





I am 99.9% certain he will sign, but he hasn't yet.
 
What a wonderful signing. Signings are awesome. It's so great to get Lamarcus signed, and signed even. I love a good signing. Signing. Signing. Signing. Now that he's signed we don't need to worry about him signing, or signing for that matter, because he's already signed.




Is that to the tune of Bonanza?
 
Wow, thanks for those awesome examples. I was uncertain, for a brief moment in time, in the actual difference between signing something, and not signing something. Now, with those clear examples, in nearly identical situations, I understand the difference.
 
It's a pretty big difference.


One means either party can technically back out for any reason whatsoever.

The other means he is signed.


You take a car for a test drive with the intention of buying it, but get in a wreck on the test drive. You don't have to buy that car.

You sign your name for the car, and drive it off the lot and crash the car, it is your car.


You are standing at the altar in front of God and everyone and you fiance doesn't show up. You don't have to give her half of your stuff.

You get married, have sex with the maid of honor and your wife divorces you. You have to give her half your stuff.


You go through 4 years of high school with straight A's and leave 1 credit short of graduating. You go to a Junior college.

You graduate from high school with stright A's and you go to Stanford.





I am 99.9% certain he will sign, but he hasn't yet.



:biglaugh:

Still makin' me laugh today! woot! :cheers:
 
Who gives a shit? They agreed. What difference does i tmake if his name has been inked on paper. Jet, is that you?




Sorry. I had no idea you knew what it meant from your statement

 
What a wonderful signing. Signings are awesome. It's so great to get Lamarcus signed, and signed even. I love a good signing. Signing. Signing. Signing. Now that he's signed we don't need to worry about him signing, or signing for that matter, because he's already signed.

I think he means, signed, as in "signing the extension"; b/c we all know he's already signed with us currently....

Unless I am reading your post wrong :)
:confused:
 
did we overpay fpr LA??? sporting news article


Before I get around to previewing those pesky Blazers (and having to take yet another stand on Andre Miller(notes)), it's worth taking a closer look at the LaMarcus Aldridge(notes) extension. Aldridge and his team appear to be well on their way to a five-year, $70 million deal.

That's a hefty chunk of change for a player who, by most accounts, has either yet to fulfill his potential or reveal exactly what his game's going to be, or maybe both. Not exactly the kind of semi-speculative investment we're used to seeing in these troubled economic times. But here's what people don't seem to understand about Portland: as good as they've been, Kevin Pritchard's five-step program to a championship depends on Aldridge, Roy and Oden. Since Oden's lagging way behind, it's all the more important that Aldridge be kept in the fold.

I know it's cool to say stuff like "just don't pay the bum" or "why would we give that dude that much?" We heard similar things about Rashard Lewis(notes) when he signed with the Magic. While Lewis was overpaid by any objective measure, he was the ideal fit for that team—that is, before Turkoglu stole our hearts. Regardless, the signing was based on what he meant to that team's plan for the future, not some universal index of value. Brandon Roy(notes) is great, but the ascendant Blazers need the rest of a core. That's Aldridge and Oden.

Plus, if Aldridge does get this vote of confidence from the team, it may sink in just how much he means to them, what the task at hand now is, and that he needs to come into focus to help the Blazers go all the way. It's vintage Pritchard that they kept Aldridge hanging and were careful to not break the bank on him. But while some see a soft tweener overpaid, anyone looking at it through Portland's goggles sees an essential piece of the roster, even if he's not there yet. There's just no other option.

Expect to see Oden handled this season with this destiny in mind. Because if Portland can't make it work with this well-laid model, they really have to blow it up and start from scratch.
 
I hate to keep bringing this up, but when did he sign?

He hasn't signed yet but remember the team is currently in Canada. If he were to sign his contract in Canada he would be paid in Canadian currency but he would also be entitled to free socialized medicine for life. I know, it's a tough decision.

Remember Roy got a press conference and a big media hug when he signed and LMA deserves the same.

He'll sign his extension when the team is actually back in the United States.
 
I think he means, signed, as in "signing the extension"; b/c we all know he's already signed with us currently....

Unless I am reading your post wrong :)
:confused:

'Fraid so. I was just seeing if my post would cause MM's head to explode. My attempt has apparently failed, but I will double my efforts.
 
I think he means, signed, as in "signing the extension"; b/c we all know he's already signed with us currently....

Unless I am reading your post wrong :)
:confused:




He is being a smartass.....which I totally appreciate by the way ES.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top