- Joined
- Oct 5, 2008
- Messages
- 126,849
- Likes
- 147,479
- Points
- 115
Has Google created CoachGPT yet?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Generally agree here.I agree as well. If you get a rookie head coach, there usually is a learning curve. "Substitutions" for a young team that is in tank mode are the least of my concerns.
If you bring in another rookie head coach he will have a learning curve as well. Would a top NBA coach take the Blazer job this summer? Doubtful. They will wait a couple of years until they feel they can win. No coach wants to be asked to intentionally lose.
There are 30 head coaching positions. And only maybe 30 lead assistant positons.
Perhaps your idea is true with established coaches, but men/women trying to break into the NBA who actually want to coach would not dismiss any opening.
One who nobody knows is good yet. That's our only hope at landing a great coach before getting a great team.
There was a time when nobody knew Phil, Pop, or Spoelstra were good coaches.
I'd say there is no chance, but it might actually be on brand for this organization at the moment.Jim Moran
You seem to equate "good" with "experienced." Plenty of good coaches out there today who aren't the retreads who would dismiss this job.Undoubtedly there are people who would take the job. Hell, I'd take the job. The goal isn't to find someone willing to take the job, it's to find someone who is really good.
The goal should always be to have at minimum a top 15 coach in the league and I don't see how this job or organization would be attractive to that type of coach.
Put Phil Jackson or Pop on their first coaching jobs without MJ/Pippen/Robinson/Duncan history would probably view them quite a bit differently.If the organization doesn't have a good idea of who will be a good coach or not, that's another problem. If our strategy is a blind crap shoot, just randomly picking coaches in hopes they'll be the next Phil, Pop, or Spo, we've got an even bigger problem.
Picking multiple bad coaches in a row while not having our house in order may not only hurt us on future coaches searches, but may hurt us regarding player acquisition and retention.
I have very little confidence this organization is in a position to identify and obtain a GOOD coach.You seem to equate "good" with "experienced." Plenty of good coaches out there today who aren't the retreads who would dismiss this job.
Bucks need help coaching the pick & rollChauncey should rage quit. That'll show 'em!
Put Phil Jackson or Pop on their first coaching jobs without MJ/Pippen/Robinson/Duncan history would probably view them quite a bit differently.
Until this roster has ONE above average starter to feature there's just no way for even a hall of fame level coach to have a lot of success.
Lakers, Phoenix, Warriors, Kings, Clippers, 6ers, Heat, Magic, etc all had superstars or multiple stars and still came up short in the first round. Blazers aren't even close to the first round losers talent level.
the Blazers do have above average "offense only" starters. Lot's of fantasy stats. But they're Part-time super shooters. They quit the year early, because Cronin is addicted to his ping pong ball. 40 to 60 games, then Grant & Simons are done. Brogdon & Matisse joined the A team quitters this season.Put Phil Jackson or Pop on their first coaching jobs without MJ/Pippen/Robinson/Duncan history would probably view them quite a bit differently.
Until this roster has ONE above average starter to feature there's just no way for even a hall of fame level coach to have a lot of success.
Lakers, Phoenix, Warriors, Kings, Clippers, 6ers, Heat, Magic, etc all had superstars or multiple stars and still came up short in the first round. Blazers aren't even close to the first round losers talent level.
the Blazers do have above average "offense only" starters. Lot's of fantasy stats. But they're Part-time super shooters. They quit the year early, because Cronin is addicted to his ping pong ball. 40 to 60 games, then Grant & Simons are done. Brogdon & Matisse joined the A team quitters this season.
Ayton did not take the Cronin free vacation. Deandre toughed through ouchie knees, and played rather well to finish his season.
What sucks the most about real injuries and "Blazer tank" injuries, was seeing Robert Williams in crutches, that guy did get hurt, season ending injury.
5 months months later, we saw Jerami Grant show up to Heat game in a Captain Crunch pimp outfit. Portland's co-captain was excited to hit the clubs in Miami as soon as his "team" was done losing by 60.
Cronin started this "cheat to lose" direction. He's got his company men that will play mostly hard, say great things about their coach, then take the bag and quit the year early.
Except Ayton, hmmm, that guy's good. Probably get some future draft picks if a playoff team offers a deal for DA.
He developed kD, RW, and Harden.In theory, I think Brooks with his head coach experience was a good assistant for Chauncey. But at this point, what they need are assistant coaches who excel at developing young players. Was Brooks good at that? I have no idea.
He developed kD, RW, and Harden.
how the heck are Blazer fans supposed to know what a top 15 starter at 1-5 position even means? We got rookies & G-League guys filling starter spots seemingly more then the regular rotation.What player(s) on the Blazer roster is in the top15 at his position? That would be the minimum talent to be considered an "above average" starter. Contenders usually have 3-4, or else two guys who are dominant at their position.
Only Blazer I can possibly see having a discussion on being a top15 guy at his position is yes Ayton, even then he might just miss that cut.
Generally agree here.
I will point out that not all rookie HC are equal. Some have 10+ years coaching experience on the bench before getting the HC spot.
Billups essentially had no coaching experience at all.
how the heck are Blazer fans supposed to know what a top 15 starter at 1-5 position even means? We got rookies & G-League guys filling starter spots seemingly more then the regular rotation.
All we can say in Portland is "Incomplete". It's near impossible to evaluate anything, because too many opponents lay the smack down on the busted up Blazers.
The guys sometimes look fantastic in garbage time... >>Look at these stats<< ... that's not good input.
then how is Portland supposed to get Suggs, WCJ, and 2 FRP's for Simons? Are the mock trade folks pulling our leg?If you follow the NBA you'd have an idea if we had above average starters (top15 at their position).
I'll give you the cliff notes - the Blazers don't.
That particular trade proposal was pretty roundly ridiculed as unreasonably imbalanced.then how is Portland supposed to get Suggs, WCJ, and 2 FRP's for Simons? Are the mock trade folks pulling our leg?
Is Simons worth any of Suggs OR WCJ OR FRPs? Probably not.then how is Portland supposed to get Suggs, WCJ, and 2 FRP's for Simons? Are the mock trade folks pulling our leg?
I don't think you can say "fired" if their contracts weren't picked up, they just didn't extend them maybe?So they DID fire ALL the assistants?
I believe only 2 of the 5.I don't think you can say "fired" if their contracts weren't picked up, they just didn't extend them maybe?
I wouldn't be surprised if that one had a backup plan but wouldn't have left if his contract had been renewed.I believe only 2 of the 5.
One left on their own choice.
2 did not get renewed.
The other 2 are still with the team (I think)
Oh, it says ALL in the thread title.I believe only 2 of the 5.
One left on their own choice.
2 did not get renewed.
The other 2 are still with the team (I think)
Do not let accuracy get in the way of hyperbole.Oh, it says ALL in the thread title.