Masbee
-- Rookie of the Year
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2008
- Messages
- 2,856
- Likes
- 97
- Points
- 48
I thought the Blazers were stupid, but what the hell do I know?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Aldridge won't make more than $12M until 2012/2013 season, so there's still a chance he improves and earns every cent. As it is right now he's probably slightly overpaid, but not enough to make a big fuss about. It took a little extra to keep him and I'm fine with that.
That Hedo contract sucks, but the Bargnani signing seems much better now than it did before. You can look at the numbers and say OMG 6.2 RPG, but watching the Raptors play night in night out I am convinced he's a 8 RPG guy easy, small factors come into play with that. I could go on for days about Bargnani but when talking about LaMarcus, from the games I have seen, I am somewhat impressed, though most of it is jumpers.
lma still wins using advanced metrics but it is getting closer.
http://www.basketball-reference.com...m=0&p1=aldrila01&y1=2010&p2=bargnan01&y2=2010
LMA is overpaid, but not grossly overpaid. I would have liked to see us sign him in the 45-50 million range. I don't think that would have been unrealistic.
I'm a big Aldridge fan, but thought/posted that they overpaid him this last offseason. I recall many posters being upset at those of us who dared to rain on their LA signing day parade by pointing out that they were overspending. I bet if I were to look up those threads it would be the same posters who are now upset he isn't playing at an all star level.But do you agree with him?
LMAs contract will look good in that 4th year. When he is finally good.
Bynum is a 22 year-old center who's putting up a PER of 20. His contract is huge, but there are only two more guaranteed years (of $28.6m) past this one on it, and I don't think many people think it was a mistake to give it to him.
Ed O.
Revisionist history?
"What if the Celts had landed the No. 1 or No. 2 pick in 2007?" (they would have taken Durant in either spot and built around Durant, Jefferson, Rondo, Pierce and a bunch of draft picks and expiring contracts
Wasn't the entire city of Boston hoping to get Oden?
Well, BS has this anecdote that Durant was #1 on Ainge's board. It rhymes well with his mancrush (and hindsight), so he goes along with it, I guess.
The thing about this whole 'should have taken Durant' situation... Let's say, in an alternate universe we take KD #1, Seattle takes Oden and his injuries don't happen. At the same time, Durant takes 7-10 (instead of 17-20) shots a game in his first three years in Portland, Oden dominates on a crappy Sonics team, while we run a Lamarcus/Zach/KD frontcourt, and all of a sudden everybody's saying we should have taken the center.
