Apple Store vs. Microsoft Store

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
Denny Crane said:
This is the stupidest post I've seen on this site in a long long time.

Just moronic.

Idiotic.

Foolish.

Need I go on?
Click to expand...

False.

Your posts about fulling utilizing your computer hardware with your IDEs is much more foolish, idiotic, moronic, and stupid than anything posted.

And to make it even more moronic, you don't even know WHY that statement is asinine.

You probably think you're maxing your your hardware when you're typing away on Notepad. Yes, that is how idiotic your post is.
 
barfo said:
That's pretty hypocritical of you, considering your responses in this discussion (quoted below).



Sure, let's have a discussion. Maybe you could begin by expanding upon 'GTFO' and 'Depends on what you consider "science"'.
Here's your contributions to the discussion so far:



barfo
Click to expand...

This is why you don't deserve any reasonable responses.

Here is your "contribution" to the thread. Nothing but utter stupidity, and wasted bandwidth.

And then you wonder why you don't get a real response from me.

barfo said:
They have this new thing called 'the Internet'. You should check it out sometime...

barfo
Click to expand...

barfo said:
Do you make your own laptops? How much do they weigh?

barfo
Click to expand...

barfo said:
I guess if I wanted a two-year old home built system, I'd buy it from you rather than Apple?

I'll keep that in mind in case I ever do.

barfo
Click to expand...

barfo said:
Obviously it did. It's pitch dark outside.

barfo
Click to expand...

barfo said:
Why don't you love the blazers?

barfo
Click to expand...

barfo said:
Please elaborate. Feel free to use more than five words if necessary.

barfo
Click to expand...
 
I'm happy to discuss why I think the original claim of "apple is used more in science" is silly, if you actually want to have a discussion.
Click to expand...

I'm waiting...

blazerboy30 said:
This is why you don't deserve any reasonable responses.

Here is your "contribution" to the thread. Nothing but utter stupidity, and wasted bandwidth.
Click to expand...

That's pretty much accurate. On the other hand, none of those posts were directed at you (except the one that says 'please elaborate'), and the exact same could be said for your contributions to the thread.

And then you wonder why you don't get a real response from me.
Click to expand...

Oh, I don't wonder. I know it's because you can't defend yourself.

barfo
 
blazerboy30 said:
False.

Your posts about fulling utilizing your computer hardware with your IDEs is much more foolish, idiotic, moronic, and stupid than anything posted.

And to make it even more moronic, you don't even know WHY that statement is asinine.

You probably think you're maxing your your hardware when you're typing away on Notepad. Yes, that is how idiotic your post is.
Click to expand...

I don't think you need to max every component in your computer 100% of the time to benefit.

Clicking on a link in a browser and having the page load in 1-2 seconds instead of 10 makes me more productive.

As brainiac points out, he maxes out his computer rendering video for seconds or minutes at a time. I'm sure he doesn't want to take your moronic advice and have less of a computer that doesn't do what he wants it to very fast.

You're just a troll. You say stupid shit to get some sort of thrill from people calling you out on it.


Your moronic posts imply it's a waste to have a car because you don't use it to its fullest when it's sitting in the driveway.
 
10 seconds? not even my shitty pc that is using windows xp takes 10 seconds to load a webpage.
 
The Sony store at Washington Square really gets quite busy.
 
Last edited:
magnifier661 said:
It took me 84.23 milliseconds
Click to expand...

2013-12-05%20at%207.54%20PM.png


16+ seconds on the 2nd load, meaning a lot of the page was already in my browser cache from the first load.

EDIT: fixed the 16 seconds load time #.
 
NBA.com

2013-12-05%20at%207.56%20PM.png


EDIT: 5.19s to load.
 
This is an interesting and humorous debate. Do you prefer Porsche or Chevy? Well, hell ya I prefer the machine that costs triple. However, I have kids (3 currently in college) and I'm not buying any of them or me a Porsche. I'm sticking to my crappy Chevy and when I'm tired of it I won't upgrade it, I'll just buy another because they go on sale, super cheap.

When my kids are through college I may buy myself a Porsche, though I may just buy a cheap Chevy and put Linux on it. Like Denny I've used Unix/Linux since the 80s at work.

p.s. Denny, interested in a watch that doesn't need batteries or winding? Check this out:

pps. I think internet connection speed is actually much more important than software or hardware and mine sucks.
 
Wizard Mentor said:
This is an interesting and humorous debate. Do you prefer Porsche or Chevy? Well, hell ya I prefer the machine that costs triple. However, I have kids (3 currently in college) and I'm not buying any of them or me a Porsche. I'm sticking to my crappy Chevy and when I'm tired of it I won't upgrade it, I'll just buy another because they go on sale, super cheap.

When my kids are through college I may buy myself a Porsche, though I may just buy a cheap Chevy and put Linux on it. Like Denny I've used Unix/Linux since the 80s at work.

p.s. Denny, interested in a watch that doesn't need batteries or winding? Check this out:
Click to expand...


Haha.. I haven't worn a watch in maybe 20 years now. The last one I owned and wore looked like this:

e01907152dc21359b1ca7b2afdbdb1cd-orig
 
Wizard Mentor said:
This is an interesting and humorous debate. Do you prefer Porsche or Chevy? Well, hell ya I prefer the machine that costs triple. However, I have kids (3 currently in college) and I'm not buying any of them or me a Porsche. I'm sticking to my crappy Chevy and when I'm tired of it I won't upgrade it, I'll just buy another because they go on sale, super cheap.

When my kids are through college I may buy myself a Porsche, though I may just buy a cheap Chevy and put Linux on it. Like Denny I've used Unix/Linux since the 80s at work.

p.s. Denny, interested in a watch that doesn't need batteries or winding? Check this out:

pps. I think internet connection speed is actually much more important than software or hardware and mine sucks.
Click to expand...


The very best argument here. You are absolutely, positively correct! And there is no shame in that either.

The shame is the Chevy owner trying to justify his car is as good or even better than a Porsche! Keep up the good fight! I admire your honesty...
 
Wizard Mentor said:
This is an interesting and humorous debate. Do you prefer Porsche or Chevy? Well, hell ya I prefer the machine that costs triple. However, I have kids (3 currently in college) and I'm not buying any of them or me a Porsche. I'm sticking to my crappy Chevy and when I'm tired of it I won't upgrade it, I'll just buy another because they go on sale, super cheap.

When my kids are through college I may buy myself a Porsche, though I may just buy a cheap Chevy and put Linux on it. Like Denny I've used Unix/Linux since the 80s at work.

p.s. Denny, interested in a watch that doesn't need batteries or winding? Check this out:

pps. I think internet connection speed is actually much more important than software or hardware and mine sucks.
Click to expand...


It sounds like we're a lot alike.

I drove a 1972 VW Bus until it wouldn't go anymore. Then I upgraded to a 1984 VW Vanagon and drove it until it wouldn't go anymore. I rebuilt the engines in those quite at least 3 times each.

I did buy a porsche 944 once. It was 20 years old and cost me just a few thousand and another couple thousand to rebuild the motor. Most fun car I ever owned.

I would much rather buy a car that's one year old than a new one. Pretty much the same car, a little worn, but save a lot of money. There isn't any real benefit that the car isn't less safe or doesn't go slower or something. At 10 miles per hour over the limit, you're asking for a ticket anyhow.
 
Denny Crane said:
Haha.. I haven't worn a watch in maybe 20 years now. The last one I owned and wore looked like this:

e01907152dc21359b1ca7b2afdbdb1cd-orig
Click to expand...

Holy shit I remembered those?!?! I wanted one soooo bad in junior high. I was like "I can cheat on my math test!"
 
Denny you hear about Mac mini conversions as a server? For 999, you can have a 2 terabyte server and link it to a raid hard drive platform. Total system cost... $1,500
 
magnifier661 said:
Holy shit I remembered those?!?! I wanted one soooo bad in junior high. I was like "I can cheat on my math test!"
Click to expand...

Stopwatch, too. So I could time how slow Microsoft Windows was. (just kidding).
 
My 90MHz Pentium computer spent 99% of the CPU just to play an MP3 music file.

If you wanted your computer to do anything else at the same time, your music stuttered or your other things went much much slower.
 
magnifier661 said:
Well learn something new everyday! :)
Click to expand...

If you're reading/writing to multiple disks at the same time, you probably will see better throughput with thunderbolt.

Thunderbolt is ridiculously fast. Much much much faster than SSDs transfer data.
 
Denny Crane said:
If you're reading/writing to multiple disks at the same time, you probably will see better throughput with thunderbolt.

Thunderbolt is ridiculously fast. Much much much faster than SSDs transfer data.
Click to expand...

Which is why they talked about video production transfer in their thunderbolt network?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top