handiman
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2008
- Messages
- 5,881
- Likes
- 3,916
- Points
- 113
SHit, sir you have NEVER seen me complain about Dame's defensive game, ever. I have played the game and was raised in it's culture. I know when you have a player with his skills, it's on his teammates to cover for whatever "weaknesses" he may have. Now if he isn't doing it on the offensive end that another story.
When guys like Ben Wallace and Rodman are out there handling their business on the defensive end and shitting the bed on offense, NOBODY complains, it's just accepted. Then why can't a player who is unstoppable with the ball in their hands get the same treatment. Good question huh?
It's an interesting perspective that made me stop and think for a minute. My counter-argument would be this: A Wallace/Rodman type helps the defense as much as a Lillard type helps the offense. However, Lillard clearly hurts the defense while Wallace/Rodman are basically neutral on offense. They're not go-to players, but they're always a threat around the glass.
So, yeah, it's a good question, but not a valid argument.

(I would have left Rodman out, as I feel his post-Pistons defense was historically overrated.)


Somebody want to get Willie Nelson to write a tie in diddy.