Trade Ben Simmons poll (1 Viewer)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in

What's the most you would give up for Ben Simmons?

  • Total voters
    145
dviss1 said:
I agree the ceiling is higher.

But... When has Simmons been called a QB on Defense? Is he going to be as good a defender without Embiid?

I personally think our defense will be better with Green. :dunno:
Click to expand...

Green is a genius coordinator on defense, I do not have any arguments about that. But as an individual defender, I think Simmons even now is more capable individually simply because of his ability to pretty much defend all 5 positions given his bigger frame and extra mobility. I think that Nurk, in many ways, replicates a lot of the defensive capabilities that Embiid provides and might even be a better defensive anchor than him (with Embiid being a much much better player offensively).

Simmons is a risk. It will either implode or it will be a combination that the league will be very afraid of. The Blazers are far enough from contention, as currently constructed, imho, and Dame is old enough to take the bigger risk if available. That's my opinion and I am fully aware that it might backfire spectacularly.
 
dviss1 said:
It does work. look at the money. Also, trademachine wins/losses??? :smiley-hmm:

You think having CJ is gonna get us more wins than a balanced roster and Draymond? I don't...

You wouldn't be excited about:

Dame
Powell
Roco
Draymond
Nurk

That certainly moves my needle!
Click to expand...
Maybe but Simmons is better than Green and only 25.
 
andalusian said:
Green is a genius coordinator on defense, I do not have any arguments about that. But as an individual defender, I think Simmons even now is more capable individually simply because of his ability to pretty much defend all 5 positions given his bigger frame and extra mobility. I think that Nurk, in many ways, replicates a lot of the defensive capabilities that Embiid provides and might even be a better defensive anchor than him (with Embiid being a much much better player offensively).

Simmons is a risk. It will either implode or it will be a combination that the league will be very afraid of. The Blazers are far enough from contention, as currently constructed, imho, and Dame is old enough to take the bigger risk if available. That's my opinion and I am fully aware that it might backfire spectacularly.
Click to expand...

IMHO this is our one and only chance to keep Dame. You trade for a guy who's his friend and can make the team better.

That's Green not Simmons.

You don't take that risk when your franchise player is on the line.
 
dviss1 said:
IMHO this is our one and only chance to keep Dame. You trade for a guy who's his friend and can make the team better.

That's Green not Simmons.

You don't take that risk when your franchise player is on the line.
Click to expand...

My gut feeling is that if this team does not seem like a contender immediatly or a team that could grow into being a contender - there is no way of knowing what Dame would do - and I for one would not hold it against him if he wants to leave. So, I would go for the bigger risk/reward option, but that's just me.
 
andalusian said:
My gut feeling is that if this team does not seem like a contender immediatly or a team that could grow into being a contender - there is no way of knowing what Dame would do - and I for one would not hold it against him if he wants to leave. So, I would go for the bigger risk/reward option, but that's just me.
Click to expand...

Dame
Powell
Roco
Green
Nurk

= Contender. Top 3 in the West.
 
dviss1 said:
Dame
Powell
Roco
Green
Nurk

= Contender. Top 3 in the West.
Click to expand...

... and you think Dame, Powell, Roco, Simmons and Nurk are not? My gut feeling - just as likely to be as that group

As great as Green is as a defensive coordinator, he has actually been an offensive liability in the last 3 years. Even in the last down-year for Simmons he has been a more productive player than Green.

In 5 less games last years his BPM of 2.7 was higher than Green's 1.5, his VORP of 2.2 vs 1.8 and if we are looking at efficiency stats PER 18.2 vs 13.3, WS/48 0.153 vs 0.122

I am also thinking that there is a much bigger chance of Ben Simmons playing his heart out to prove to everyone that Philly are the ones that made the mistake - Green, frankly, has nothing to prove in the NBA.
 
andalusian said:
... and you think Dame, Powell, Roco, Simmons and Nurk are not? My gut feeling - just as likely to be as that group

As great as Green is as a defensive coordinator, he has actually been an offensive liability in the last 3 years. Even in the last down-year for Simmons he has been a more productive player than Green.

In 5 less games last years his BPM of 2.7 was higher than Green's 1.5, his VORP of 2.2 vs 1.8 and if we are looking at efficiency stats PER 18.2 vs 13.3, WS/48 0.153 vs 0.122

I am also thinking that there is a much bigger chance of Ben Simmons playing his heart out to prove to everyone that Philly are the ones that made the mistake - Green, frankly, has nothing to prove in the NBA.
Click to expand...

No. I don't. I think Simmons is critically flawed. The man is 5/34 for 3 in his career. Barely takes any mid range jumpers.

I think it's a recipe for disaster and y'all are clamoring for it.
 
Idog1976 said:
Im sorry, but this can’t be right. I'm told all day every day he's an offensive liability. This is clearly doctored video and official NBA stats. Likely Russian hackers.
Click to expand...

Meh...

Do it in the playoffs when it counts...
 
dviss1 said:
No. I don't. I think Simmons is critically flawed. The man is 5/34 for 3 in his career.
Click to expand...

I am afraid that in the last couple of years, it is better than what Green is doing.

Last year Simmons took 10 3PA hitting them at 30% rate (bad).

Last year Green took 126 3PA hitting them at 27% rate (worse rate, and a lot more "wasted" possessions) (For the record, he took 129 attempts the year before at 27.9% and 165 attempts a year before that at 28.5%)

Simmons not taking 3PA at this point is better than Green taking them.

Barely takes any mid range jumpers.
Click to expand...

Again, not an interesting statistic imho. Simmons had 583 FGA last year, Green had 380 in 5 more games. On top of that, Green had an awful .540 TS% vs Ben's .584 - so he is taking more shots and hitting them at a higher rate than Green.


I think it's a recipe for disaster and y'all are clamoring for it.
Click to expand...

I said that I believe there is a chance it will be an absolute disaster, but there is also a chance this is going to be one of the most frightful combinations in the entire NBA.
 
dviss1 said:
It does work. look at the money. Also, trademachine wins/losses??? :smiley-hmm:

You think having CJ is gonna get us more wins than a balanced roster and Draymond? I don't...

You wouldn't be excited about:

Dame
Powell
Roco
Draymond
Nurk

That certainly moves my needle!
Click to expand...
We're sending out 31 mil and taking back 24. Is that allowed? Doesnt work under the 1.25x +100k rule. Or maybe it is because we are taking back less?
 
illmatic99 said:
does that -8 wins projected not give you pause? And I don't think it works #s wise.
Click to expand...
No, because he has a theory a very secret theory, one he's unwilling to repeat, despite spamming every Simmons thread with how bad he is due to said pet theory he refuses to repeat because it's on the reader to go through the archives and find it. Or, more likely, it's a weak-ass theory he knows can't stand up under scrutiny.
 
andalusian said:
I am afraid that in the last couple of years, it is better than what Green is doing.

Last year Simmons took 10 3PA hitting them at 30% rate (bad).

Last year Green took 126 3PA hitting them at 27% rate (worse rate, and a lot more "wasted" possessions) (For the record, he took 129 attempts the year before at 27.9% and 165 attempts a year before that at 28.5%)

Simmons not taking 3PA at this point is better than Green taking them.



Again, not an interesting statistic imho. Simmons had 583 FGA last year, Green had 380 in 5 more games. On top of that, Green had an awful .540 TS% vs Ben's .584 - so he is taking more shots and hitting them at a higher rate than Green.




I said that I believe there is a chance it will be an absolute disaster, but there is also a chance this is going to be one of the most frightful combinations in the entire NBA.
Click to expand...

I KNOW you're not tryna make a case for Simmons being a better shooter than Green... Bro... Don't be like Max Kellerman...
 
illmatic99 said:
We're sending out 31 mil and taking back 24. Is that allowed? Doesnt work under the 1.25x +100k rule. Or maybe it is because we are taking back less?
Click to expand...

24 x 1.25 = 30

It's about a Mil...
 
dviss1 said:
I don't believe Simmons is better for our team. I like many other GMs wouldn't touch him with a 10 foot pole.
Click to expand...

Proof on your assertion that GM's won't touch him? I'm pretty sure you're mistaking Morey's INSANE asking price and therefore GM's hanging up the phone, for nobody wants him at a reasonable price.
 
dviss1 said:
I KNOW you're not tryna make a case for Simmons being a better shooter than Green... Bro... Don't be like Max Kellerman...
Click to expand...

He is a better scorer. This team, even without CJ do not lack shooters. What they need is more people that attack the rim. At this point it is Dame and Norm.

As for a better shooter, the stats tell us in the last several years, he has been better than Green. As I said, Green has been an offensive liability in the last 3 years, Simmons has not been. He (Ben) is a not a good shooter, but he is a good scorer. Unfortunately, Green is neither at this point.
 
dviss1 said:
Meh...

Do it in the playoffs when it counts...
Click to expand...
He did in every series but the Hawks, far better than your boy CJ, both last year and overall the stats have been put up repeatedly, but you got your "theory".
 
Idog1976 said:
Proof on your assertion that GM's won't touch him? I'm pretty sure you're mistaking Morey's INSANE asking price and therefore GM's hanging up the phone, for nobody wants him at a reasonable price.
Click to expand...

You have access to every search engine that I do...
 
dviss1 said:
You have access to every search engine that I do...
Click to expand...

I guess you can't type out your own thoughts. Have you had that diagnosed? Sounds serious bro. I can talk to my sister at OHSU I'm sure I can get you a neurologist who can help you get to the bottom of your inability to articulate your thoughts more than once.
 
andalusian said:
As for a better shooter, the stats tell us in the last several years, he has been better than Green. As I said, Green has been an offensive liability in the last 3 years, Simmons has not been. He (Ben) is a not a good shooter, but he is a good scorer. Unfortunately, Green is neither at this point.
Click to expand...

I know you're smart enough not to use the small sample size of 34 3 point shots taken in his career to come to that conclusion...
 
andalusian said:
He is a better scorer. This team, even without CJ do not lack shooters. What they need is more people that attack the rim. At this point it is Dame and Norm.

As for a better shooter, the stats tell us in the last several years, he has been better than Green. As I said, Green has been an offensive liability in the last 3 years, Simmons has not been. He (Ben) is a not a good shooter, but he is a good scorer. Unfortunately, Green is neither at this point.
Click to expand...

He's got a mysterious theory though! Who needs stats, eye-test, playoff stats and league accolades when Dviss has a "theory" a theory so strong it can't be repeated due to its overwhelming certainty.
 
Idog1976 said:
I guess you can't type out your own thoughts. Have you had that diagnosed? Sounds serious bro. I can talk to my sister at OHSU I'm sure I can get you a neurologist who can help you get to the bottom of your inability to articulate your thoughts more than once.
Click to expand...

Bro, I don't need to do your research for you. Inability to articulate my thoughts... Hilarious...

You don't know me...
 
dviss1 said:
Bro, I don't need to do your research for you. Inability to articulate my thoughts... Hilarious...

You don't know me...
Click to expand...

Nor do I know your magical theory that you won't repeat. I know I always try and hide arguments when they are super strong. I never say, hide weaknesses, like say terrible theories I won't repeat lest they get shredded.
 
Idog1976 said:
He's got a mysterious theory though! Who needs stats, eye-test, playoff stats and league accolades when Dviss has a "theory" a theory so strong it can't be repeated due to it's overwhelming certainty.
Click to expand...

You're kind of an asshole bro. Again, you don't know me...

The eye test on Simmons is that his is LITERALLY afraid to shoot.

Y'all bring up one regular season game where he was aggressive and all of the sudden your point is proven.

No, the playoff series and his entire career of being scared to shoot and scared to go to the free throw line is well documented...

Talmbout some eye test... Fool, I've used my eyes to come to my conclusion.
 
Idog1976 said:
Nor do I know your magical theory that you won't repeat. I know I always try and hide arguments when they are super strong. I never say, hide weaknesses, like say terrible theories I won't repeat lest they get shredded.
Click to expand...

What fucking theory are you talking about?? Stop making shit up as you go along.
 
"I have news for Philly fans. The GMs of the other teams watch the playoffs very, very closely. And there are definitely teams that I have talked to in the last 48 hours who were once in on Simmons, who say, at least to me, it could be posturing, 'Eh, we're a little less in than we used to be." Zach Lowe

https://www.espn.com/radio/play/_/id/31654254
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)

Featured content

Back
Top