STOMP
mere fan
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2008
- Messages
- 11,543
- Likes
- 4,254
- Points
- 113
You disagree with the point of view of the threadstarter so you want the 2 enduring threads to end.
can't you be bothered to read? I just stated that "I'm hardly a big fan of Nate's" and that subject matter isn't the issue. Or are you claiming super powers able to read deep into my subconscious and what I stated isn't how I honestly feel?
Firing the coach is major enough to warrant 2 lasting threads.
didn't I just say 1 or 2 threads on the same subject matter is fine?
It's like having multiple threads on matters you find harmless, like who to draft, which players are doing well, etc. Should each of those subjects have only one ongoing thread? Even if firing Nate had only one ongoing thread, you'd still object to that.
Posters should be able to air their views on important subject matter like the coach, no question. Whether the OP expressed a pro or con view doesn't really matter to a multiple page discussion. But after having expressed their points multiple times in 2-3 existing threads, the same poster(s) starting yet another on the same exact subject matter a day or two later is just being an ass cluttering up the board for readers regardless of what their view is. Doing so doesn't lend the poster's view weight, it makes it seem like they've got OCD.
Merge? Sure I guess, though I'd rather the Mods not be bothered with this sort of stuff. A little self control would be much better. At the least, a new thread on something thats been beaten to death should bring something new to the discussion. Reading the title in this thread, I thought the poster was going to suggest who they thought was the brightest young coach to possibly replace Nate.
Hopefully thats clear enough for you
STOMP
