BlazerBeav
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2008
- Messages
- 8,209
- Likes
- 7,600
- Points
- 113
Better than Cheeks and Carlesimo? Yes. Better than "Dumbleavy"? Not based on record he isn't.
If you only look at their record with the Blazers, Mike D had more success than Nate.
Of course, but since we all have the ability (or at least most on here) of considering mitigating factors such as available rosters, then it's quite easy to reason that he too was a worse coach than Nate. Mike egregiously underachieved with the most talent laden roster this franchise has ever seen. Nate took what may have been the least talented roster in the league upon his arrival and had it as the #4 seed in his third season.