Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well we are also 2nd in defensive efficiency even before this game.So that's what defense boils down to?
I wasn't disagreeing, but defense is much more than points allowed.Well we are also 2nd in defensive efficiency even before this game.
True, which is why I posted all the major defensive ranks, which all are top 3. I'd say we are arguably the best defensive team in the league right now. That's insane bro!I wasn't disagreeing, but defense is much more than points allowed.
If that's the case then we are 1a and the Dubs are 1b.True, which is why I posted all the major defensive ranks, which all are top 3. I'd say we are arguably the best defensive team in the league right now. That's insane bro!
I agree. Golden State is a bad ass team. I really, really, really hope that we meet in the WCF! That would probably be the most exciting 7 game series in a long whileIf that's the case then we are 1a and the Dubs are 1b.
How can a series be more exciting than last years series vs houston though.I agree. Golden State is a bad ass team. I really, really, really hope that we meet in the WCF! That would probably be the most exciting 7 game series in a long while
One, it'll probably go 7 games instead of 6.How can a series be more exciting than last years series vs houston though.
That was pretty exciting too, but I think the stakes are higher. The Splash Bros vs. The RainBroz. Aldridge vs. Lee, Batum (jack of all trades) vs Iggy (Jack of All trades) and Lopez vs. The Asshole Aussie. We are pretty much ditto copies of each other. It would be fun to watchHow can a series be more exciting than last years series vs houston though.
That was pretty exciting too, but I think the stakes are higher. The Splash Bros vs. The RainBroz. Aldridge vs. Lee, Batum (jack of all trades) vs Iggy (Jack of All trades) and Lopez vs. The Asshole Aussie. We are pretty much ditto copies of each other. It would be fun to watch
Heh heh... Still it's gonna be fun beating them and ripping their hearts out
But they really don't have the best D. If anything, Blazers and Golden State are equal defensive teams, with the Blazers having the slight edge.Pace plays a factor which is why GS have the best D
Opp FG% they are firstBut they really don't have the best D. If anything, Blazers and Golden State are equal defensive teams, with the Blazers having the slight edge.

Good points! OppFG% is still my preferred measure for defense because it takes out the FTs that are shot at the end of close games when one team purposely puts the other at the line trying trade 2 points for 3 and stop the clock. All it measures is a team's ability to force misses by the opposing team.According to this website we have the 2nd best defense.
http://nyloncalculus.com/stats/league-efficiency-pace-summary-stats-2014-2015
PPG is not a reliable measure of defense because of pace.
Points per possession is the way to go to measure offensive or defensive efficiency, but you have to make sure "possession" means major possession, not minor possession.
If you have the ball, miss a shot, get the rebound, and score, that was one major possession but two minor possessions. You want to use major possessions when measuring team efficiency. To illustrate why, suppose a team holds opponents to 30% shooting but can't get a defensive rebound at all. Obviously, their defense is terrible because opponents will keeping getting offensive rebounds till they score. Defensive efficiency per minor possession will be great. Defense per major possession will be awful. The latter is the the right measure because in fact, the opponent always scores.
Most websites that have "points per possession" don't tell you if that means major or minor possessions. The website I linked above doesn't tell you either, but because each teams offensive and defensive possessions are almost identical, I'm pretty sure those are major possessions. In a given game, offensive and defensive major possessions alternate, so they are identical except for when a team possessed the ball at both start and end of quarter.
http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/team/_/stat/team-comparison-per-game/sort/fieldGoalPctOpponentGood points! OppFG% is still my preferred measure for defense because it takes out the FTs that are shot at the end of close games when one team purposely puts the other at the line trying trade 2 points for 3 and stop the clock. All it measures is a team's ability to force misses by the opposing team.
PPG is a very overrated and sometimes misleading stat.
Good points! OppFG% is still my preferred measure for defense because it takes out the FTs that are shot at the end of close games when one team purposely puts the other at the line trying trade 2 points for 3 and stop the clock. All it measures is a team's ability to force misses by the opposing team.
PPG is a very overrated and sometimes misleading stat.
All good points, again. And perfectly illustrates that no single stat can be used to fully explain how well/poorly a team/player performs. Still, when doing a quick & dirty review my first stop is OppFG%, followed by OppeFG%, and then if I want more info I start looking into FTA, Rebounding, Points in Paint, etc.That's a good point about FT's in close games. Those should somehow be taken out.
But using only Opp FG% misses many important factors:
- a team may give up lots of 3's. lower fg% but higher efg%
- a team may foul too much in the process of holding opp fg% down
- a team may cause lots of turnovers
- a team may have great or terrible defensive rebounding
http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/team/_/stat/team-comparison-per-game/sort/fieldGoalPctOpponent
And we are 2nd in that as well. It really is shocking in how much our defense has improved. And deceiving, I wonder how many other teams or beat riders know that until they look at the stats
Well we are first in OppeFG%, 2nd in FG%, 1st in OPP3PT%All good points, again. And perfectly illustrates that no single stat can be used to fully explain how well/poorly a team/player performs. Still, when doing a quick & dirty review my first stop is OppFG%, followed by OppeFG%, and then if I want more info I start looking into FTA, Rebounding, Points in Paint, etc.
