Blazers Biggest Mismatch Advantage

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

STARTING 5 BIGGEST MATCH-UP ADVANTAGE

  • BLAKE/BOOKS

    Votes: 8 13.3%
  • ROY/ARTEST

    Votes: 2 3.3%
  • BATUM/BATTIER

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • ALDRIDGE/SCOLA

    Votes: 45 75.0%
  • PRZYBILLA/MING

    Votes: 5 8.3%

  • Total voters
    60

bluefrog

Go Blazers, GO!
Joined
Sep 23, 2008
Messages
1,964
Likes
81
Points
48
There are some great match-ups in this series. Speaking strictly of the starting 5s where will out biggest advantage be?
 
Our best starting lineup advantage is obviously Aldridge. But, our best overall advantage over the Rockets will be our depth.
 
Our best starting lineup advantage is obviously Aldridge. But, our best overall advantage over the Rockets will be our depth.

I gotta agree with that; after looking at these matchups, I'd rate Brooks even with Blake, Roy even with Artest and Yao and Battier ahead of Przbilla and Batum, so that doesn't look so good, but I'm still optimistic.
 
I like Books, lol, i kid, anyway, as an outside fan, I would agree with the others that LA is your biggest advantage in mismatches.
 
Our biggest advantage is our Bench.. if Outlaw, Rudy, Sergio and Oden bring it..we win this series.

When our bench is playing well - Teams just can't handle our depth...

Portland wins in 6.
 
Our best starting lineup advantage is obviously Aldridge. But, our best overall advantage over the Rockets will be our depth.

Agreed. The Blazers don't win this series unless their bench clearly out-plays the Rockets' bench.
 
It's Aldridge over Scola, but that's not what I'm worried about, it's Chuck Hayes vs Aldridge which has given LMA fits this year.
 
Obviously, our bench dwarfs theirs.

Bake it!
 
Roy vs. Battier/Artest. As good of defenders as Battier and Artest are, Roy is much superior to both. He needs to outplay both of them for us to win. I have no doubt he will.

Brandon is a superior player to either overall (especially his offense vs. theirs) but their defense is so good so suffocating (and Artest is so physical) that they are really going to blunt Brandon's effectiveness as an scorer, I have a feeling Brandon is going to be doing a lot more distributing and having to get his offense off of cuts and catch-and-shoots in this series than we are used to seeing; he's almost going to have to be a decoy at times and then be opportunistic when opportunities present themselves.

This a really bad matchup for Portland ... probably as bad as Joel/Oden vs. Yao.
 
I'm worried about the quickness of Brooks, and his outside shooting over Blake. Last time IIRC he killed Blake. When Brooks drives, he'll cause the D to collapse which can easily cause us to not play the bigs as well.
 
Couple of thoughts:

Sscola is underrated.

Teams normally shorten the rotation in the plyaoffs, so if Blazers are relying on their bench, the bench squad will most likely have to play against the other teams starters (or top 7 players).

Personally I am counting on the Blazer top 7 beating the Rockets top 7.
 
But why do teams shorten their rotation in the playoffs? Because their starters are so much better than their bench, and the playoffs are so important (and the summer potentially so close) that they need to ride the starters harder.

In that light, I don't think we need to shorten our rotation much - we've got a great bench with at least three players who would start on other teams (Greg, Rudy, Travis). So play them as usual, and our starters will be fresher against their starters.

Advantage Portland.
 
But why do teams shorten their rotation in the playoffs? Because their starters are so much better than their bench, and the playoffs are so important (and the summer potentially so close) that they need to ride the starters harder.

In that light, I don't think we need to shorten our rotation much - we've got a great bench with at least three players who would start on other teams (Greg, Rudy, Travis). So play them as usual, and our starters will be fresher against their starters.

Advantage Portland.

This is what I'd like to see in the playoffs. Enact something akin to Nolan Richardson's "[48] Minutes of Hell". Simply press the hell out of the other team, run our players through screen after screen after screen and simply wear their starters out. I think Rudy, Sergio and Batum could make life tough for Battier, Artest and Brooks/Lowry.
 
Agreed. The Blazers don't win this series unless their bench clearly out-plays the Rockets' bench.
if that's true(i don't really agree that it is), then the blazers could be in some trouble. the rockets have a pretty good bench with lowry, wafer, and landry being the main guys. hayes and mutombo provide a defensive presence which will probably be needed against aldridge and oden and barry adds some extra shooting.

i wouldn't count on the blazers bench significantly outplaying the rockets bench to make the difference in the series.
 
Our biggest advantage is our Bench.. if Outlaw, Rudy, Sergio and Oden bring it..we win this series.

When our bench is playing well - Teams just can't handle our depth...

Portland wins in 6.

Devils advocate says there are more and longer timeouts/breaks in playoff basketball...benches mean slightly less since starters can go for longer
 
Our biggest advantage: Rose Garden vs. Toyota Center. No Contest. :pimp:
 
if that's true(i don't really agree that it is), then the blazers could be in some trouble. the rockets have a pretty good bench with lowry, wafer, and landry being the main guys. hayes and mutombo provide a defensive presence which will probably be needed against aldridge and oden and barry adds some extra shooting.

i wouldn't count on the blazers bench significantly outplaying the rockets bench to make the difference in the series.


Which is part of the reason I picked Rockets to win in 6.
 
I don't follow. You think Roy vs. Battier/Artest is to the Rockets' advantage, just as it is with the Joel/Oden vs. Yao matchup? Hell, we might as well not show up to play if that was the case. As I said, Roy will have to (not just, but totally) outplay his matchup at SG. Whether it is scoring 40 points with 2 assists or 4 points with 15 assists and 10 rebounds, Roy will have to dominate his man for us to advance. Yao will do his damage against whoever we match up with him. Roy will have to do the same against them.

I didn't say Brandon has no chance, I just said his offense against their defense is a bad matchup, if other guys can step up and act as a reasonable 'release valve' when he's being hounded and doubled to death then it will make his life easier and should give him some more room to operate.

Honestly, a lot of it's going to come down to how the refs call the game; if they allow Artest to really get into Brandon bumping him and pushing him on his way to the hoop then there's just no way Brandon will be able to overcome that disparity in strength, if they call it a little tighter and don't let Artest get away with a lot of bodying up on the perimeter then I think he'll have to back off a little bit and that could be just enough for Brandon to get to his spots and do his damage.

What, you somehow think Brandon's offense against arguably two of the best perimeter wing defenders in the league is somehow a good matchup?!
 
Other! Our bench will kill theirs!
 
Do I think Battier/Artest will defend Roy better than most wingmen in the league? Absolutely. Do I think that Roy will outplay both of them? Absolutely. Just because Battier/Artest are more competent at defending Roy than most players, it doesn't make it so that they'll outplay Roy.

So to answer your question: Yes, I do think it is a good matchup for us, simply because Roy will outplay them. Roy might have his way more with other players defending him, but he'll still be superior to both Battier/Artest when matching up against them. I'm looking at our production at SG (with Roy) vs. whoever Houston will play at SG. This is a position where I think we will outproduce them simply because Roy is better than anyone Houston has at this position.

To clarify further: Kobe vs. Roy would be a bad matchup for us. Wade vs. Roy would be a bad matchup for us. Any other SG vs. Roy would be a good matchup for us.

I don't think you understand what I mean by a "bad matchup", I'm not talking about the opponent's wing being able to outscore him, I'm talking about the opposing wing being able to lock him down and force him into bad shots, which takes our number 1 option and hurts his effectiveness on the court, which in turn leads to a much less efficient offense overall, because A) he's not hitting anywhere near his season averages on FG%, and B) if he's passing it off, chances are it's going into the hands of a less effecient shooter. Battier and Artest don't have to outplay him on both ends to win, they just have to 'blunt the tip of the spear' so to speak and let other guys like Yao carry the primary load offensively.

Brandon's 3 games this year against the Rockets:
Game 1: 6-18 FG (33%), 1-3 three pointers, 17 points, 5 assists 7 rebounds, 5 turnovers
Game 2: 10-23 FG (42%), 0-4 three pointsers, 24 points, 5 assists, 5 rebounds, 3 turnovers
Game 3: 8-20 FG (40%), 2-5 three pointers, 23 points, 6 assists, 3 rebounds, 2 turnovers

Overall: 39% FG, 25% on threes. Points, rebounds and assists are roughly the same as his season averages, but 3.3 turnovers per game isn't so hot.
 
Last edited:
Woops, I read that wrong. I thought it was the mismatch in Houston's favor. I voted for Yao.
 
Don't forget how well OUR defense has played recently. I do think the Rockets will be able to slow our offense - they are very good defensively, but I think we can shut them down too. How we defend Yao is pivotal. If we can keep him in check, they will struggle to score as well.

Earlier in the year our pick-n-roll defense was awful, but it's improved dramatically down the stretch. Plus, Houston doesn't feature that enough to scare you. They will try to pound Yao, get our bigs in foul trouble and (if that happens we're in trouble) that opens up a lot of looks for everybody.

My biggest question is this . . . can the Blazers maintain their defensive focus in a 82-79 game? If we're shooting 37% from the field, can we keep our concentration on defense for 48 minutes to shut THEM down too? If they do, the series is there for the taking. If they get flustered because the shots aren't falling and have that leads to defensive lapses - we're in trouble. It's going to be a slug fest, and it might not be pretty. But if we can "win ugly" we'll move on to the next round.
 
Unfortunately Aldridge is being outplayed by Scola Today. The only matchup I thought we had an advantage.
 
I'm worried about the quickness of Brooks, and his outside shooting over Blake. Last time IIRC he killed Blake. When Brooks drives, he'll cause the D to collapse which can easily cause us to not play the bigs as well.



I'm quoting myself, because, well I was right....

Brooks a 2 year PG killed us. Destroyed our defense. How can this be?....:dunno: But it happened last time we played and it happened again...

Lets hope we can stop him Tuesday.
 
I'm quoting myself, because, well I was right....

Brooks a 2 year PG killed us. Destroyed our defense. How can this be?....:dunno: But it happened last time we played and it happened again...

Lets hope we can stop him Tuesday.

Here's your cookie ...
 
If LaMarcus doesn't show up again and score at least 20 points, we're done. He is one guy we need to establish a post presence against Scola/Landry.
 
If LaMarcus doesn't show up again and score at least 20 points, we're done. He is one guy we need to establish a post presence against Scola/Landry.
trying to establish that greg oden guy to force yao to worry about his man defensively might help the blazers as well.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top