Blazers Rotation (5 Viewers)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

You pull out 5 games (there are 82) because you had to SEARCH for them. I only remember one. What does that say? So it was 5 instead of one. Does that prove a point other than I was a .5% overzealous in saying "literally 1"?

You found 5 damn games...

upload_2017-9-26_12-59-11.png

Dude--you called him the 17th man, said he didn't show a single NBA skill last year, and said he literally had one good game, yet continue to claim you're not hating on him.

I'm just tryna keep it real (I think I used that correctly).
 
Think we need to hold the horses on this Caleb starting thing. I still think Aminu gets the nod.

Starting: Dame/CJ/ET/Aminu/Nurk

2nd unit: Shabazz/CJ/Moe/ Caleb/Ed

Scrubs: Pat/Lay/Meyers/Collins
 
View attachment 16304

Dude--you called him the 17th man, said he didn't show a single NBA skill last year, and said he literally had one good game, yet continue to claim you're not hating on him.

I'm just tryna keep it real (I think I used that correctly).

I didn't say anything untrue. If you think Meyers is better than Layman or Pat, I'll just agree to disagree. And again, your using 5 games to make your point...

I'm not hating at all. I'm giving my opinion. There's a difference.

You also didn't circle the part "in an effort to make them look bad".

Again, I'm not making him look bad nor am I making an effort to do that.

HE'S doing a great job of that for me.
 
Only men who pay for it get waived and stretched. As of today, the official Blazers site has him listed. They need accurate information. Loyal fans deserve it.

Is it really that big a deal? :dunno:
 
Think we need to hold the horses on this Caleb starting thing. I still think Aminu gets the nod.

Starting: Dame/CJ/ET/Aminu/Nurk

2nd unit: Shabazz/CJ/Moe/ Caleb/Ed

Scrubs: Pat/Lay/Meyers/Collins

Aminu starting at PF is a strong possibility. We would need some solid rebounding help from him if we did.
 
I didn't say anything untrue. If you think Meyers is better than Layman or Pat, I'll just agree to disagree. And again, your using 5 games to make your point...

I'm not hating at all. I'm giving my opinion. There's a difference.

You also didn't circle the part "in an effort to make them look bad".

Again, I'm not making him look bad nor am I making an effort to do that.

HE'S doing a great job of that for me.
If you can't admit that claiming he's the 17th man in the rotation or that he only had 1 good game last year are untrue statements, then there's nothing I can do for you...
...except keep your seat next to me on the Meyers bandwagon warm. Despite the hating you won't cop to, you'll be welcome to hop on anytime. :cheers:
 
Is it really that big a deal? :dunno:
No...However, if your one job is to keep an accurate website for an organization, you ought to be more diligent. I 'm ready to drop it.
 
17th man....yet we rarely go one day without discussing him.....in 5 years. Does anyone else find that kind of odd?

Scapegoat. Easier to hate on him than face truths about the better players on the team. It's only natural. Every fanbase is like that.
 
If you can't admit that claiming he's the 17th man in the rotation or that he only had 1 good game last year are untrue statements, then there's nothing I can do for you...
...except keep your seat next to me on the Meyers bandwagon warm. Despite the hating you won't cop to, you'll be welcome to hop on anytime. :cheers:

You disagree with me that Meyers is the worst on the team. That's fine. I truly believe this.

So he had, IYO, 5 good games. I only remember one. That doesn't mean I'm hating. That means I'm mistaken about 4 games....

You are also forgetting that I need to be doing that in an EFFORT to make him look bad.
As I explained before, he's doing the best job of that and doesn't need any help from me in that area.

And you're gonna need a space heater to keep that seat warm. You're on that bandwagon by yourself and.... Winter is coming... :D
 
You disagree with me that Meyers is the worst on the team. That's fine. I truly believe this.

So he had, IYO, 5 good games. I only remember one. That doesn't mean I'm hating. That means I'm mistaken about 4 games....

You are also forgetting that I need to be doing that in an EFFORT to make him look bad.
As I explained before, he's doing the best job of that and doesn't need any help from me in that area.

And you're gonna need a space heater to keep that seat warm. You're on that bandwagon by yourself and.... Winter is coming... :D
All semantic arguments which I reject. I'm still fully convinced you're a Meyers hater, but I love you anyway, and will wait patiently for you.

angif-jump-on-the-bandwagon.gif
 
I wouldn't say I "believe" in Meyers. But I believe he gets way more bashing than he deserves. And I believe it's a new year, and he should be given a new chance. If he fails, I don't understand the point or the positive outcome of bashing the guy. If there is someone better, that better someone will play. If there isn't someone better, and if he isn't good enough, that's on management. If Meyers were dogging it, or sandbagging, or just showing up for a paycheck, or fattening up at voodoo donuts, I could see the negative sentiment. But I don't think anyone can argue that he isn't trying, or he doesn't want to do well. It's not nice to bag on those less able than ourselves ;)

:cheers:
 
Last edited:
View attachment 16304

Dude--you called him the 17th man, said he didn't show a single NBA skill last year, and said he literally had one good game, yet continue to claim you're not hating on him.

I'm just tryna keep it real (I think I used that correctly).

If you really think @dviss1 is hating (OK, he is a little bit), you need to rewatch the 4th quarter of our last regular season game.
 
There were other options at the link as well, but we don't need to belabor the point.

We invented the term "Playerhater" Jussayin.

The point is you and most in here use that term (hater, hating) out of context.

Arguing against that point and saying I'm belaboring it, is wrong and deflecting.
19789999.jpg
 
Last edited:
We invented the term "Playerhater" Jussayin.

The point is you and most in here use that term (hater, hating) out of context.
Perhaps. But you know, not even black people are consistent about their definition of the term. I mean, this other guy I know has repeatedly said that it's basically just speaking disparagingly about someone.

You guys gotta have some perspective. When you say a player is garbage or trash, it's not a literal thing. You simply don't like the way that player plays and don't want him on your team.

Same thing as being a "hater". You don't hate the person you're hating on. You are simply saying something disparaging about them.

One or 2? Now you're just being a hater. And really quick,

black slang alert:

Some of you in here think when using the term hater that it literally means you hate. No that's not what it means. It's never meant that you actually hate the person that you're talking about. Hating simply means that you are disparaging them for your own agenda.
 
Perhaps. But you know, not even black people are consistent about their definition of the term. I mean, this other guy I know has repeatedly said that it's basically just speaking disparagingly about someone.

That's the basic gist. But there has to be an agenda.

A player hater is one who does it to make themselves feel good and also get a one up on who they're hating on.

Specifically, a player hater is one who says disparaging things about a man to one of his women in an effort to get her.

The term has been overused and used out of context for a long time.
 
We invented the term "Playerhater" Jussayin.

The point is you and most in here use that term (hater, hating) out of context.

Arguing against that point and saying I'm belaboring it, is wrong and deflecting.
19789999.jpg
Depending on one's perspective, that's the beauty and the curse of the English language: It is constantly evolving. What a word meant yesterday may not be how it is used tomorrow.

:cheers:
 
Depending on one's perspective, that's the beauty and the curse of the English language: It is constantly evolving. What a word meant yesterday may not be how it is used tomorrow.

:cheers:

Meh. I get all that. But to change meaning of the word mid stream and then use it as an out of context cudgel is another thing.

And for the record, I ain't never been a hater.
 
Meh. I get all that. But to change meaning of the word mid stream and then use it as an out of context cudgel is another thing.

And for the record, I ain't never been a hater.
Ooh, "cudgel". Well done Sir! ;)

:cheers:
 
You pull out 5 games (there are 82) because you had to SEARCH for them. I only remember one. What does that say? So it was 5 instead of one. Does that prove a point other than I was a .5% overzealous in saying "literally 1"?

You found 5 damn games...
And we won most of them. Meyers is the key to our success!!!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top