Blazers swap Clevelands 2018 first for 2017 first.

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Scalma

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 18, 2014
Messages
23,631
Likes
34,982
Points
113


My question is, why? Because this years class is better? Because we're trading our own pick somewhere else?
 
So WE get the 2017 1st round? The way they worded that confuses me.
 
If we use it, it's a ~$1M cap hit, assuming the Cavs pick is # 25-30
 
Glad Olshey is doing all these favors for teams. When does it come back around?

Just like when I screamed about the Anderson Varejao trade. We could have squeezed Cleveland for much more. They were desperate. Only one other team could trade with them, and wasn't very interested. Another Olshey giveaway.
 
Just like when I screamed about the Anderson Varejao trade. We could have squeezed Cleveland for much more. They were desperate. Only one other team could trade with them, and wasn't very interested. Another Olshey giveaway.
Ohio owes the Blazers for generations to come....Oden was from Ohio....it's like a Stephen Stills gospel song...
 
So now we can trade our own pick now before the draft. Hold ontoyour shorts

This screams precursor to our move now.
 
At some point, NO and PA have to figure out if this team, this season, is a contender as is. If not, they would likely consider if a trade can put them over the top. If not, then we probably won't see a trade at all. Not shuffling the deck chairs around on the sinking boat.
 
So now we can trade our own pick now before the draft. Hold ontoyour shorts

This screams precursor to our move now.

What do you mean? not being snarky, genuinely asking.
 
why couldn't we trade our 2017 pick if we wanted to? We still have our 2018

Because we didn't have a 1st round pick in 2016. You're not allowed to go two years in a row without a 1st round pick. Now we have two. So, we can trade one and keep one.

It's referred to as the Ted Stepien rule.

Edit: Actually, that is incorrect. The Stepien Rule only applies to FUTURE first round picks.

We can even trade BOTH 2017 picks (ours and CLE's) if we want. Maybe there is a potential trading partner out there that wants two additional first round picks in what is supposed to be a very deep draft.

BNM
 
Last edited:
Because we didn't have a 1st round pick in 2016. You're not allowed to go two years in a row without a 1st round pick. Now we have two. So, we can trade one and keep one.

It's referred to as the Ted Stepien rule.

Edit: Actually, that is incorrect. The Stepien Rule only applies to FUTURE first round picks.

We can even trade BOTH 2017 picks (ours and CLE's) if we want. Maybe there is a potential trading partner out there that wants two additional first round picks in what is supposed to be a very deep draft.

BNM
Really? Thought the Stepien thing still applied.
 
So I am wondering if this move is indeed leading to another move we make or if Cleveland hit us up just to make the deal. We need to grab Nerlens if we can man, he is young and is what we need. Paul milsap would be great to but it looks like all these other teams are gonna go after him, we could swoop in under the radar and grab nerlens if philly wants to hear offers
 
Because we didn't have a 1st round pick in 2016. You're not allowed to go two years in a row without a 1st round pick. Now we have two. So, we can trade one and keep one.

It's referred to as the Ted Stepien rule.

Edit: Actually, that is incorrect. The Stepien Rule only applies to FUTURE first round picks.

BNM
I was about to teacher the golden opportunity to correct you for once.

Some we have CLEs 2017 1st, could we trade our own 2017 and 2018 1st round picks, since we wouldn't be left without 1sts in consecutive years? (We'd have CLEs 2017, POR 2019)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top