BGrantFan
Suspended
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2010
- Messages
- 5,194
- Likes
- 52
- Points
- 0
I loved that Whitsitt didn't let fiscal responsibility or player character get in the way of building a winning team. The team was fun to watch, had a swagger, and won games.
I didn't love that while building the team, Whitsitt had put the team in cap hell after the title window had closed. He seemed to be gunning for one title, and when that didn't happen, there was no Plan B. What was witnessed in the latter Whitsitt years, and the Nash and Patterson years, was the direct result of gunning for one title. Had we seen that title, I'd judge Whitsitt in a very positive light. Since we didn't, and since he basically went all in and then lost, I view his as a reckless gambler who hamstrung an entire organization for more than a half decade.
I didn't love that while building the team, Whitsitt had put the team in cap hell after the title window had closed. He seemed to be gunning for one title, and when that didn't happen, there was no Plan B. What was witnessed in the latter Whitsitt years, and the Nash and Patterson years, was the direct result of gunning for one title. Had we seen that title, I'd judge Whitsitt in a very positive light. Since we didn't, and since he basically went all in and then lost, I view his as a reckless gambler who hamstrung an entire organization for more than a half decade.

But Yankees fans are pretty happy. I imagine if Portland could and did bring in LeBron James and Chris Paul and won 4-5 titles, I'd be quite happy even if a lot of fans from other teams considered the Blazers high-spending scum.