Politics Bob Woodward's new book...

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Spud147 said:
Okay, sure, under your definition of "nominated" Trump has been nominated and so has Putin for that matter. Whether either one made it on the short list for the committee to vote on we'll never know unless one of them wins it.

Given that criteria, would you consider writing a letter nominating me? It think it would look great on my resume, I'm a big fan of world peace, and I do my best to make nice on this Blazer board despite all the aggravating people and posts. :smiley-trophy:
Click to expand...


...what the hell are you talking about?...I said he had been "nominated"... and HE WAS...and I certainly did not "define" the word "nominated"...that was you alone who decided to do that.

....I never said he should have been or that he should/win...it was a tongue in cheek comment in reply to what 2 other posters posted...it was making fun of the fact that they brought up Obama won the award...that's where it started and that's where it ended...and interjecting yourself into the nomination convo is irrelevant.

...not sure why you are cherry picking a small portion of what I have said and trying to make this into something it is not...unless you're simply that bored.
 
yankeesince59 said:
...what the hell are you talking about?...I said he had been "nominated"... and HE WAS....I never said he should have been or that he should/win...it was a tongue in cheek comment in reply to what 2 other posters posted...it was making fun of the fact that they brought up Obama won the award...that's where it started and that's where it ended...and interjecting yourself into the nomination convo is irrelevant.

...not sure why you are cherry picking a small portion of what I have said and trying to make this into something it is not...unless you're simply that bored.
Click to expand...

Okay, okay, sheesh... not trying to make you mad at all. In can interject and be as irrelevant in any post I want but thank you for your input.

And of course I'm bored. If I had anything better to do right now than kill time at work by posting irrelevant stuff on an anonymous internet forum I would be doing it. Fortunately I am getting paid for it.
 
Spud147 said:
Okay, okay, sheesh... not trying to make you mad at all. In can interject and be as irrelevant in any post I want but thank you for your input.

And of course I'm bored. If I had anything better to do right now than kill time at work by posting irrelevant stuff on an anonymous internet forum I would be doing it. Fortunately I am getting paid for it.
Click to expand...

"And I get paid for doing this"
 
DaLincolnJones said:
Okay, help me out here home fry, I can chose to believe it or not...so when I chose to not believe it, that is not allowed? Come on Bro..

I will clarify if I can.

The op ed piece from the NY Times, with no named sources I believe is sour grapes

Woodwards quotes are already being denied by those he has "quoted. He has in the past been accused of making stuff up..so if in fact people have been stealing papers off the desk of the President, there will be charges. If there are no charges, then that would make me tend to bvelieve those that deny Woodwards stuff.
Click to expand...

...now you're just twisting everything. But I'll ask again and maybe I'll get a straight answer for a change.

1..after all of the collective negative shit than has been said by people in the know why would you choose instead to believe Trump?

2...after being fingered by his staff/aides for bashing Trump, would you really expect them to own up to it?...please, use common sense.


...the claims about Trump's idiocy is a COLLECTIVE bag of scary shit...and if you can't/won't admit to the handwriting on the wall, you're fooling yourself.
 
Spud147 said:
Okay, okay, sheesh... not trying to make you mad at all. In can interject and be as irrelevant in any post I want but thank you for your input.

And of course I'm bored. If I had anything better to do right now than kill time at work by posting irrelevant stuff on an anonymous internet forum I would be doing it. Fortunately I am getting paid for it.
Click to expand...

...well geez, I've tried 3-4 times to explain it to you...and back up, I didn't say YOU were "irrelevant"...I said that "interjecting yourself as nominated" was irrelevant.

...we done?
 
yankeesince59 said:
...now you're just twisting everything. But I'll ask again and maybe I'll get a straight answer for a change.

1..after all of the collective negative shit than has been said by people in the know why would you choose instead to believe Trump?

2...after being fingered by his staff/aides for bashing Trump, would you really expect them to own up to it?...please, use common sense.


...the claims about Trump's idiocy is a COLLECTIVE bag of scary shit...and if you can't/won't admit to the handwriting on the wall, you're fooling yourself.
Click to expand...



As to #1 I find Trump more credible than his accusers

As to #2 I expect bashing by x staffers, if there is indeed a faction still within that is causing trouble, I expect that it should be dealt with.


Home Fry, you are entitled to your opinion, as am I
 
DaLincolnJones said:
As to #1 I find Trump more credible than his accusers

As to #2 I expect bashing by x staffers, if there is indeed a faction still within that is causing trouble, I expect that it should be dealt with.


Home Fry, you are entitled to your opinion, as am I
Click to expand...

BobDaLincolnJones!
 
yankeesince59 said:
...well geez, I've tried 3-4 times to explain it to you...and back up, I didn't say YOU were "irrelevant"...I said that "interjecting yourself as nominated" was irrelevant.

...we done?
Click to expand...

I didn't even realize we were doing anything but sure.

And also, Trump wasn't "officially" nominated... you're wrong and I win.

Okay we are now done, thank you sir!!!
 
SlyPokerDog said:
BobDaLincolnJones!
Click to expand...

Bob-Jones-University-782x587.jpg
 
DaLincolnJones said:
As to #1 I find Trump more credible than his accusers

As to #2 I expect bashing by x staffers, if there is indeed a faction still within that is causing trouble, I expect that it should be dealt with.


Home Fry, you are entitled to your opinion, as am I
Click to expand...



...wow, I rest my case...the jury is now excused.
 
Spud147 said:
I didn't even realize we were doing anything but sure.

And also, Trump wasn't "officially" nominated... you're wrong and I win.

Okay we are now done, thank you sir!!!
Click to expand...


...well so much for you getting paid ...and jumping blindly half cocked into a convo that you clearly were not abreast of.

...Trump WAS nominated...you lose...would you like the link again...sorry if your definition of "nominated" does match what the link clearly said...again, your misfortune.
 
yankeesince59 said:
...well so much for you getting paid ...and jumping blindly half cocked into a convo that you clearly were not abreast of.

...Trump WAS nominated...you lose...would you like the link again...sorry if your definition of "nominated" does match what the link clearly said...again, your misfortune.
Click to expand...

Spuds is one of our nicest members.

And she is a she so I'm not sure she can be full or half cocked.
 
Spud147 said:
And I'm sorry, @yankeesince59, I'm seriously just joking around and I'm going to stop now because I like your posts and really didn't mean to get anything started.
Click to expand...

...Ma'am, I apologize if I was too abrasive...I was brought up to be more respectful of Ladies, and I'm sorry if I treated you like some of the others here.
...fwiw, we could probably use a little less testosterone-enriched postings here and more of yours...HA !..How's that for an apology?


...as an olive branch. i would like to offer you a jumbo bag of Extra Crunchy Chee-tos....deal?
 
DaLincolnJones said:
Okay, I will take this serious.

If he acted like hillery has done for years. She was the epitome of corrupt. The good news is that while she was able to act while being protected by her cronies and the media, Trump could never dream of getting away with a fraction.

If he turns against his base and ignores the direction that we asked for (WE being his supporters)

Actually acted against the constitution...not just the silly rhetoric shown by the dems, but something serious that was fact and could be proven
Click to expand...

First Hillary has zero to do with a red line for Trump so get over your hate for Hillary as she is NOT the president and NEVER will be the president. It appears you don't really have a red line as you dismiss anything negative that is printed or said about Trump regardless of any kind of evidence. I appreciate the attempt though even though it wasn't really helpful. Apparently lying to the American people doesn't bother you nor does his absurd close relationship with Russia and their obvious attempt at infiltrating our elections.
 
yankeesince59 said:
...Ma'am, I apologize if I was too abrasive...I was brought up to be more respectful of Ladies, and I'm sorry if I treated you like some of the others here.
...fwiw, we could probably use a little less testosterone-enriched postings here and more of yours...HA !..How's that for an apology?


...as an olive branch. i would like to offer you a jumbo bad of Extra Crunchy Chee-tos....deal?
Click to expand...

No need to apologize at all and who can say no to Chee-tos?!? YES!!! :grouphug:
 
Lots O folk in here scrambling to prove their stance on Woodard...

It's kinda funny watching y'all squirm...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top