santeesioux
Just keep on scrolling by
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2008
- Messages
- 10,752
- Likes
- 5,333
- Points
- 113
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AP said:They say consumers, particularly those overseas, have made it clear they won't watch films when the actors use condoms, complaining that it is distracting and ruins the fantasy.
Christian Mann said:You can't actually compel an industry to create a product that the market doesn't want
how is it harmful to its consumers, exactly?
Also, legal precedent of prevent an industry from creating a product harmful to its consumers. I would think tobacco and alcohol would fall pretty squarely into that category, and is still around.
I would think there's a difference between harmful toys and porn, I dunno.
Otherwise, wouldn't a lot of "normal" movies fall under the same issue. If someone is copying things done in a movie, no movie is safe.
Otherwise, wouldn't a lot of "normal" movies fall under the same issue. If someone is copying things done in a movie, no movie is safe.
This is a bit of a stretch, I admit. But if my initial premise is valid--that condom-free porn promotes condom-free sex--then it can be contended that it promotes the spread of sexually-transmitted diseases, thereby harming consumers.
Harmful toys, controlled substances, lead paint, toxic pesticides--need I go on?
Consider the purpose of the movie. What normal movies exist solely for the purpose of depicting a fantasy that can actually be recreated in reality? Porn is a very different medium from all other movies.
