BY next playoffs

[andalusian]

Jack was the point guard at the end of a large number of games last season. And I thought he started at least part of the season.

At any rate, Nate played him in crunch time which allowed Jack to lose at least 4 games for Portland last season. Nate would have never stopped playing Jack in crunch time as long as he was on the team.

As for Sergio Vs Jack Vs Blake: That is like comparing shit with nuts in it versus shit with corn in it. No matter then difference, you are still talking about shit.

Jack started 3 games at the start of last year. After that he was moved to the bench because Blake deserved it. Nate was right about Blake over Jack last year and he was right about Jack vs. Sergio. They might have both been shit - but one of them was done in a bathroom with proper ventilation and running water - the other was done on the kitchen table during dinner...

I am really not sure why we even bother going down this road again - but even this year - where Sergio was much better than he was last year - Sergio's PER is lower (12.5) than Jack's was last year (13.1) - don't get me started on Sergio's PER last year (under 10), his win-score this year (1.6) is lower than Jack's last year (3.0) and let's not talk about Sergio's win-score last year (it was actually negative - I can't for the life of me think of another case when someone had a negative win-score and people were clamoring to have him replace someone that had a positive win-score).

 

[hasoos]

Jack started 3 games at the start of last year. After that he was moved to the bench because Blake deserved it. Nate was right about Blake over Jack last year and he was right about Jack vs. Sergio. They might have both been shit - but one of them was done in a bathroom with proper ventilation and running water - the other was done on the kitchen table during dinner...

I am really not sure why we even bother going down this road again - but even this year - where Sergio was much better than he was last year - Sergio's PER is lower (12.5) than Jack's was last year (13.1) - don't get me started on Sergio's PER last year (under 10), his win-score this year (1.6) is lower than Jack's last year (3.0) and let's not talk about Sergio's win-score last year (it was actually negative - I can't for the life of me think of another case when someone had a negative win-score and people were clamoring to have him replace someone that had a positive win-score).

You can argue until you are blue in the face about who is better than who. The fact is, none of them are getting it done. Period. Getting it done is what it's about. Not whose getting it done better than who.

 

[andalusian]

You can argue until you are blue in the face about who is better than who. The fact is, none of them are getting it done. Period. Getting it done is what it's about. Not whose getting it done better than who.

So - if you can not become Bill Gates rich it does not matter if you can have a nice house in the suburbs (or an apt. downtown - as you wish) or if you are homeless living under a bridge? Please...

 

[hasoos]

So - if you can not become Bill Gates rich it does not matter if you can have a nice house in the suburbs (or an apt. downtown - as you wish) or if you are homeless living under a bridge? Please...

No because your example is moot. Bill Gates is getting it done. Your just being a dumb ass.

 

[andalusian]

No because your example is moot. Bill Gates is getting it done. Your just being a dumb ass.

I am clearly missing the point - but could you please specify what is it of mine that is not so smart in the buttocks region?