SharpeScooterShooter
SharpeShooter
- Joined
- May 23, 2022
- Messages
- 7,196
- Likes
- 5,890
- Points
- 113
start the actual video at 0:18 and tell me that the elbow hit Zach's face. It absolutely did not, so you saying it did is just false
in the video I posted that you didn't watch there were a bunch of poster dunks that had similar arm action to Senguin's....and were not called. I time-stamped one that had more egregious contact than Senguin's and was actually called a defensive foul. There were about a dozen actual ebow's to the face in that video by the way and I didn't see any offensive fouls called
my argument on the call 'standing' is that if it had been called a defensive foul on Zach, it almost certainly would have stood too
but this argument has run it's course. You're seeing an elbow to Zach's face that never happened and using that to justify the call. No point in taking it any further
Sorry, couldn't watch a longish video. I was at work. is there a chance those were also fouls not called? Were talking nba referring after all.
And i don't consider us arguing, just discussing.

Do you think those arms in the vid constitutes a foul regardless of the referee call or not?
I think there are two parts to this. Should this have been called a foul in the game?
Should this be changed to a foul if it isn't already?
my thought is a ref would say the arm is a foul( might be wrong) but if not, SHOULD they be?
Do you think it isnt a foul because its not called or simply because you do not believe its a foul period to partially extend like that?



Debating a foul about a former irrelevant player.