Right, and I realize this. This is why I don't understand why you threw out the comparison of their rookie years. Everyone knew that Andrew was going to be a product. No one expected him to come in and be an instant double double as a rookie. So why you bother to even point out that Bynum wasn't productive is beyond me. Him and Oden were in completely different situations as rookies. A lot is expected of Oden, nothing was expected of Bynum. To compare rookie seasons is crazy.
And for the record, I'm not criticizing Oden's stats, I just don't see how you can argue that he's better than Bynum when he has done nothing. When Oden puts up better numbers than Bynum, then we can talk about him better. Last I knew though, Oden couldn't even stay on the court, so your argument about him being "better" is absolutely moot because you have no evidence of it. At all.