Canzano says Blazers being prepared for auction

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

With Damian as the first player ever to be in a movie about Space and actually go to space!

Maybe someone will pay for a bulletin board begging Elon to buy the Blazers!

On the serious, he is an investor and from what i know(not much), for the elite rich, pro sports franchise are a near slam dunk investment?

No NBA franchises aren't a slam dunk investment. If Paul Allen had put the money he paid for the Blazers in the stock market it would be worth more than $2 billion.

Yes if you look at the millions owners paid and the billions franchises are worth it appear to be an amazing investment. But when you have hundreds of millions, you have a lot of potential amazing investments.
 
The owners make $$$$$$ off of expansion fees, they make nothing if the Blazers relocate.

If the Blazers moved to a more lucrative market the owners would get a split of that revenue sharing.

Expansion also costs owners money every year forever since they have to split league wide revenue more slices.

Ultimately it may be that expansion is financially better than Blazers relocation for the league, but it's not a for sure thing.
 
If the Blazers moved to a more lucrative market the owners would get a split of that revenue sharing.

Expansion also costs owners money every year forever since they have to split league wide revenue more slices.

Ultimately it may be that expansion is financially better than Blazers relocation for the league, but it's not a for sure thing.
I don’t think it works that way?
Yes more slices but more households are watching and overall market increases. Bigger pie!
 
of those rumored thus far I think MacKenzie Scott is the best candidate although I don't see why she would be interested . Ultimately I want someone who doesn't want the team to move and is invested on the team winning outside of finical motivation.
 
Allen signed 30-year pact declaring team can't move
A legal document signed by Paul Allen prohibits him from relocating the Trail Blazers to another city while he owns the NBA franchise. If he sells the team, Allen agreed to make sure the new owner would be bound by the same conditions.

Under a 30-year 'exclusive site agreement' with the city of Portland that went into effect June 23, 1993, Allen promised to keep the Blazers in Portland.

The 18-page document is signed by Allen and then-Mayor Vera Katz, among others. Parties to the agreement include Allen, the city of Portland and Trail Blazers Inc.

Three weeks ago, Allen's representatives made public a plea to city, county and state officials for financial support for the Blazers through a proposed 'public-private partnership' to help fix a 'broken financial model.' A representative said then that the NBA club stands to lose $100 million over the next three years.

In meetings with local government officials, Allen's representatives have not been specific about what sort of form that partnership could take. But there have been veiled references to Portland's somehow losing its NBA team. In fact, in a posting on the Trail Blazer Web site last weekend, in a 'Conversation with Paul Allen,' the owner broached the possibility of the team's moving:

'I want the team to stay in Portland,' he wrote. 'If this all ends up in the courts, or someone buys the team and moves it, it would be a shame.'

But the 'Exclusive Site Agreement' would seem to make that impossible.

Portland Mayor Tom Potter was unavailable for comment. His press aide, John Doussard, said Potter 'is aware of the document. I don't know he has read it. We know the document exists and know what it says. I have seen the document. (But) Paul Allen has not called us up and talked about moving the team.'

Under terms of the 1993 document Ñ signed more than two years before the Rose Garden opened Ñ moving the Blazers would be a costly proposition for the world's sixth-richest man. Allen's personal liability is limited to Sections 3.4, 3.5 and 3.7, which deal with transfer of ownership of the team. In signing, Allen agreed that a franchise move to another city would result in paying damages to the city of Portland.

'In the event of a breach of this agreement by TBI (Trail Blazers Inc.) or Allen,' Section 4 begins, 'the city will suffer both damages compensable by the payment of money, and damages (that) will not be compensable by money and É will be irreparable.'

If that happened, the city could ask for a judge to issue an injunction to prevent Allen from selling or moving the club until its legality was decided in a court of law.

The document stipulates that a purchaser of the Blazers would 'agree É without modification or qualification, with the covenants and restrictions applicable to Allen set forth in this agreement.'

A legal opinion obtained by the Portland Tribune suggests that the agreement is unusually strong on the side of the city, which would be the third-party beneficiary for any breach of contract.

Even if Trail Blazers Inc. were to file for bankruptcy, the party assuming ownership of the club would be responsible under Section 3.2, which reads, 'In the event of the liquidation or dissolution of TBI, the covenants and restrictions É set forth in this agreement shall be binding upon the shareholders of TBI or any other distributee of the franchise and related assets and properties of TBI.'

Blazer team President Steve Patterson and J. Isaac, the team's senior vice president of business affairs, referred questions to Andy Brimmer, communications director for Vulcan Capital, Allen's private investment group.

'As we said yesterday, both Vulcan and the city expressed a common goal of keeping the franchise in Portland,' Brimmer said in an e-mail. 'However, in the ongoing discussions, we decline further comment.'

https://pamplinmedia.com/pt/9-news/97715-tough-city-contract-keeps-grip-on-blazers?jr=on

30 years from 1993 is.... 2023. So what your saying is the Blazers could relocate next year?

I think it's unlikely the Blazers move, but if the team is sold for $1.5-$2 billion and its owners with a preference for a different geographical area, and the team struggles for the next year(s) with this crappy roster......

The Blazers leaving Portland is certainly above a 0% probability.
 
I don’t think it works that way?
Yes more slices but more households are watching and overall market increases. Bigger pie!

It possibly could be a bigger pie, and I'm sure that would be the goal of the NBA owners accepting expansion. But its not a guarantee that expansion would lead to more revenue per team.

It also has an opportunity cost of expanding now, it would then make further expansion less likely (which could be for an even bigger $ amount in the future)

I'm just pointing out, the expansion fee isn't as simple as free money with no downside for existing owners as often is portrayed.
 
The owners have to sign off on any franchise relocation. There is no reason for the Blazers to move.

The league could sign a deal with the city of Portland saying that the team will not move for 40 years, and fans would still be like "Yeah, but in 2063 they're gonna move to Seattle!1!1!!!"
 
  • Like
Reactions: RR7
I would like someone with ties to the Northwest and hopefully not some right wing fanatic QAnon homophobe who has beats up women.
I think the PNW ties is meaningless. Agree with the rest.

I care more about engagement with the fanbase and a will to win than if they grew up in the community, etc. We have precedence in recent years with people out of market buying NBA teams and having success (robert pera-- grizzlies, marc lasry -- bucks, ballmer-- clips, etc etc).

Is there anything THAT unique about an increasingly cosmopolitan Portland now that requires an owner to be homegrown to understand it? (not trying to be snarky, genuinely asking because this prerequisite is brought up even for GM/coach openings here on this forum)
 
30 years from 1993 is.... 2023. So what your saying is the Blazers could relocate next year?

I think it's unlikely the Blazers move, but if the team is sold for $1.5-$2 billion and its owners with a preference for a different geographical area, and the team struggles for the next year(s) with this crappy roster......

The Blazers leaving Portland is certainly above a 0% probability.

The team could have moved 10-15 years ago. That agreement hasn't really meant much. The penalty for moving was $80 million. Once the team reached a value of over a billion the penalty was toothless. If you could afford to pay $1 billion for the team you could afford to pay the penalty.
 
if you can bear Canzano's whiny narratives... here is more discourse on the topic. brian berger is always insightful.

 
Berger mentioned another name who apparently has already expressed interest in being a minority owner of other sports franchises around the country. Berger said the league would like to make her a majority owner candidate.

Laurene Jobs
 
Last edited:
It possibly could be a bigger pie, and I'm sure that would be the goal of the NBA owners accepting expansion. But its not a guarantee that expansion would lead to more revenue per team.

It also has an opportunity cost of expanding now, it would then make further expansion less likely (which could be for an even bigger $ amount in the future)

I'm just pointing out, the expansion fee isn't as simple as free money with no downside for existing owners as often is portrayed.
You can't just dream up scenarios that might be different.
Expansion brings revenue. They don't consider expanding into areas that would not bring revenue. Los Vegas and obviously Seattle will bring revenue.
Seriously.... They pay really smart people with the very best data to look into this stuff.
 
You can't just dream up scenarios that might be different.
Expansion brings revenue. They don't consider expanding into areas that would not bring revenue. Los Vegas and obviously Seattle will bring revenue.
Seriously.... They pay really smart people with the very best data to look into this stuff.

The Las Vegas Blazers DOES have a ring to it……
 
If the Blazers were to move to Vegas the team name the Blazers would be left in Portland for a future expansion team to use. See the Sonics for example.

Would that be a specific stipulation of a contract with the Blazers? I ask because i don't know, but I do not think what you are saying isn't always the case, or an nba mandate?

See the Grizzlies for example.
 
Would that be a specific stipulation of a contract with the Blazers? I ask because i don't know, but I do not think what you are saying isn't always the case, or an nba mandate?

See the Grizzlies for example.
The Grizzlies had no history in Vancouver. It's apples and oranges.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top