Chad Ford "Andre Miller is on the block"

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

MIXUM

Suspended
Joined
Oct 15, 2008
Messages
5,983
Likes
44
Points
0
http://www.blazersedge.com/2011/1/5...the-block-blazers-management-is-more#comments

This likely explains miller average play of late... he knows his days are numbered.

So much for playoffs. But wait....


Hollinger speculates Blazers will go after Nash.


John Hollinger assesses the faltering Phoenix Suns on ESPN Insider and writes on yesterday's rumor du jour, that franchise point guard Steve Nash might be headed for the block. Hollinger names the Portland Trail Blazers as one of the teams that might be interested in Nash's services should the Suns decide to move him...
--------------------------
Which takes us to the elephant in the room: Steve Nash. If the Suns do decide to rebuild, then obviously it makes sense to trade Nash while they still could command a huge ransom for his services. Although Nash is 36 years old, he remains among the most efficient offensive operators in basketball -- indeed, in all of basketball history.

As such, one presumes he would command heavenly sums from contending-but-still-a-player-short teams like Orlando (again), Dallas, or perhaps even Portland. The Knicks, given the presence of Stoudemire and Mike D'Antoni, also present an intriguing possibility. So do the Hawks, if they could muster the gumption to take a risk or two, and the Rockets, who might score 300 points a game with Nash and Kevin Martin in the same backcourt.
--------------------------

The knock against the Nash-to-Portland idea the previous 45 times it was floated was always the issue of pace and style, tracing back to a misfit alongside guard Brandon Roy.

With Roy now out of the picture indefinitely, and no longer the roster centerpiece going forward, Nash's age becomes the biggest question when assessing his fit in Portland. He's got a few years left, max.
 
Miller moving for younger players makes sense to anyone with a brain. Portland giving up younger players for Nash makes sense for our sweet smelling GM
 
as usual everything has different thoughts....

ford says blazers are blowing it up

hollinger says we might try to get nash

??????
 
I know Miller is slow, but he has looked a half step slow (from his usual slow) all season. I also know he doesn't get off the ground much, but again this season looks different than last year.

I believe Miller should be shopped, but I wonder what our new star LA thinks of that. I remember the big men in Philly saying they were going to miss Miller as he made thier job a lot easier with easy basket for them. I could see LA thinking the same thing.

If Miller is traded, you would think it would have to be for a PG given taht Mills is next in line.
 
the truth is miller has been just OK this year. the trade rumors are obviously bothering him.
 
I bet Aldridge would love playing with Nash. He could become "STOUDEMIRE 2.0, NOW WITH DEFENSE!"

The asking price would probably be Batum + filler. Which I'd seriously consider, depending on how likely the lockout is.

We'd have a gaping hole at SF. But maybe you still have enough spare parts to get something done. Miller + ? = ?
 
I bet Aldridge would love playing with Nash. He could become "STOUDEMIRE 2.0, NOW WITH DEFENSE!"

The asking price would probably be Batum + filler. Which I'd seriously consider, depending on how likely the lockout is.

We'd have a gaping hole at SF. But maybe you still have enough spare parts to get something done. Miller + ? = ?

Yes but that would probably blow my whole theory of Nash doubling a players output when playing with him! Unless of course Lamarcus started averaging 39.8 points and 19.2 rebounds a game when playing with Nash.....
 
miller has not looked the same the last month
 
Hopefully, everyone is on the block. Just get the right price.
 
Nash and Josh Childress works in exchange for Batum/Przybilla/Miller.
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=28kpuuc

We get the best player in the deal, but they get the best young player. Przybilla and Miller leave at the end of the year, cutting about $14 mil in salary for Phoenix.

Childress is still a little intriguing. I know he's 27 and hasn't done much in Phoenix, but he's supposed to be a decent defender. Decent stopgap at SF.

Although this deal hurts our pretty crappy depth even more, I'd really like to see Aldridge and Nash paired together.
 
Nash and Josh Childress works in exchange for Batum/Przybilla/Miller.
http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=28kpuuc

We get the best player in the deal, but they get the best young player. Przybilla and Miller leave at the end of the year, cutting about $14 mil in salary for Phoenix.

Childress is still a little intriguing. I know he's 27 and hasn't done much in Phoenix, but he's supposed to be a decent defender. Decent stopgap at SF.

Although this deal hurts our pretty crappy depth even more, I'd really like to see Aldridge and Nash paired together.



Horrible trade. Miller is going to win us just as many titles as Nash would, so then it's Joel and Batum for Childress.


Trading good young players only getting better to good old players only getting worse for a team that isn't close to competing is a recipe for the Knicks
 
Horrible trade. Miller is going to win us just as many titles as Nash would, so then it's Joel and Batum for Childress.


Trading good young players only getting better to good old players only getting worse for a team that isn't close to competing is a recipe for the Knicks

Totally agree.
 
Getting Nash makes no sense now. It would have made sense last season, or maybe the season before, but not now. He would help us slightly more than he is helping Phoenix. He needs to go to a contender. I'm surprised Orlando didn't try to get Nash.
 
I like both Nash and Josh Childress, but ultimately Nash just doesn't fit with the team's contention time frame any better than Miller and while I'm a fan of Childress' game, I believe Batum has a significantly higher potential ceiling.

If Portland were a title contender this season and looking for a bit of a boost to become a likely favourite, this deal would make sense. You trade some upside for some present day certainty. But that's not the type of deal Portland should be making. While I've never advocated tearing it down, I do think that the team should be making more upside gambles, not trading away upside.
 
I like both Nash and Josh Childress, but ultimately Nash just doesn't fit with the team's contention time frame any better than Miller and while I'm a fan of Childress' game, I believe Batum has a significantly higher potential ceiling.

If Portland were a title contender this season and looking for a bit of a boost to become a likely favourite, this deal would make sense. You trade some upside for some present day certainty. But that's not the type of deal Portland should be making. While I've never advocated tearing it down, I do think that the team should be making more upside gambles, not trading away upside.

I think NY should make a move for Nash. With him they might actually make some noise in the playoffs.
 
I guess I was thinking there'd be an outside chance we could re-acquire Przybilla after his contract ends. (He lives here and likes it.)

Also, I always felt Stoudemire and Marion got a lot of their "strut" from having Nash set them up for so long. I see it less as renting Nash for a likely second round (maybe WCF) run, than I do see it as an investment in Aldridge's future. Maybe Nash turns him into an All-NBAer like Roy, and superstar treatment from refs ensues. Aldridge averages an extra 4-7 ppg for the rest of his prime, even after Nash leaves.

*shrug* I guess I'm also down on Batum lately. He's kind of in a funk. There's no way I'd suggest that trade a few months ago....

Meh, I guess it's not that hot of an idea.
 
Championship. Look what he did last year. Western Conference Finals. If Artest doesn't hit that show in Game 5, they maybe reach the Finals. Put Aldridge, Camby, Matthews, and Rudy or Batum with Nash and we could do the same thing. Dint underestimate what a two time MVP can do for your team.
 
Contender for what?

For Senior citizen discounts.... but I'd still take him. Only problem I have is there better be another move that helps us be a contender because this move alone only makes us slightly better.
 
Championship. Look what he did last year. Western Conference Finals. If Artest doesn't hit that show in Game 5, they maybe reach the Finals. Put Aldridge, Camby, Matthews, and Rudy or Batum with Nash and we could do the same thing. Dint underestimate what a two time MVP can do for your team.

Uh huh. Sure thing.
 
I still think Nash has a bit of good play left in his tank. I'd take him if we can draft a good young PG that we could groom behind him. Similar to what Phoenix is doing with Dragic and Denver with Lawson.
 
Nash is an upgrade over Miller, and he'll win more games than Miller.

He'd probably guarantee that the Blazers make the playoffs, although I'm not sure Nash would want to come to Portland.

A PG with a 24 PER for a PG with a 19 PER, when both can't play defense? Sure...
 
Last edited:
Portland is the closest team geographically to Victoria BC.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top