illmatic99
formerly yuyuza1
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2008
- Messages
- 57,773
- Likes
- 56,294
- Points
- 113
From Draftexpress:
[video=youtube;wBXAKc1itfM]
[video=youtube;wBXAKc1itfM]
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
???BPA!!!!!

Chad made his philosophy very clear: draft best talent available, not by position ("regardless of position or age")
Best Player Available. Let's hope the new GM shares the same mindset.
Then acted on it by selecting Nolan Smith
Maybe he misunderstood what "BPA" means... So he drafted the Best Person Available. Nolan sure is a great guy!
Maybe he thought it was already the second round?
You guys really think Buchanan made the decision to draft Nolan?
No, it was Nate, but as a GM you have to be able to sell PA on the right choice. That's why Chad should be nowhere near our GM job
But why be so high on either of these new guys coming in and so down on Chad?
But why be so high on either of these new guys coming in and so down on Chad?
But why be so high on either of these new guys coming in and so down on Chad?
You guys really think Buchanan made the decision to draft Nolan?
During one part of the conversation, I suggested to him that perhaps Portland's GMs over the past few seasons haven't had the freedom to make their own draft picks -- that perhaps Paul Allen was doing the picking. There are rumors of that, of course. People whisper that it was Allen, for instance, who wanted Nolan Smith over Kenneth Faried last year, while the basketball people argued otherwise.
That elicited a surprised reaction from the GM on the other end of the phone line.
"Here's the thing," he said. "That just can't happen. If I couldn't convince my owner to take the guy I want to take, I would resign. I shouldn't be in that job if I can't win that argument with my owner."
Because, in my eyes, Chad has proved to me that he doesn't have command of the draft room that a GM needs to have. Maybe it's a grass is always greener scenario, but the others haven't shown me yet that they are failures at this very important part of the job
There's also the possibility that he's grown into the role after a year as interim GM. We're not in a position to know the dynamics of how decisions have been made over the past year. There have been some major bumbling moves made, without a doubt, but after the meltdown at mid-season, the team's also been positioned to be in a good spot this summer. Chad doesn't strike me as dumb. I would bet that he'd be the first to admit that things didn't go the way he had hoped, but that he's also learned from what happened. Should he get the job? Not if there's a better candidate. OTOH, I don't know if there is a better candidate either.

Chad was on the cusp of moving from scout to GM last year, while working of a man who values ability to get along with him above all else. If we were the board of directors I could see why we might be concerned by that. But, Chad did not have the security of the full GM contract to take strong stands. He is building a rep with PA, but he likely knows if you don't approach it slowly, you will end up out of the organization.
I'm not saying I want Chad as GM, but I'm not sure we can say at this time that he wouldn't be good if given full authority and a guaranteed salary for a few years.
Am I the only person here who works in large company with complex politics?
Well said. But the negative nancy crowd wont agree.Chad was on the cusp of moving from scout to GM last year, while working of a man who values ability to get along with him above all else. If we were the board of directors I could see why we might be concerned by that. But, Chad did not have the security of the full GM contract to take strong stands. He is building a rep with PA, but he likely knows if you don't approach it slowly, you will end up out of the organization.
I'm not saying I want Chad as GM, but I'm not sure we can say at this time that he wouldn't be good if given full authority and a guaranteed salary for a few years.
Am I the only person here who works in large company with complex politics?
Well said. But the negative nancy crowd wont agree.
To paraphrase for the positive-impaired (cough, MM, cough), you can't really compare the boldness of quickly promoted, interim GM, to a GM who has had the security of a contract. And, the complex political maneuvers required to move from scout to GM can hide the true abilities of the candidate. Chad is still an unknown to most of us.
