Rumor Channing Frye return?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
Frivolous rumors nothing more
 
RR7 said:
That's a very interesting idea. My guess is you can not do it, though. Otherwise I think we would have seen philly do it previously.
Click to expand...
I think you can, but I'm not sure. Denny?
 
PtldPlatypus said:
I'm sure picks could be involved to balance things out. If they gave us their pick in that deal, would you not be interested?
Click to expand...
Milwaukee would never do that so it wouldn't matter.
 
If it were Meyers for Frye+Lottery Protected first? Sure. Frye is a good locker room guy, we would still have oodles of cap space this summer to throw around too.
 
Leonard for Monroe makes sense for both teams. The biggest flaw Milwaukee has is lack of spacing as all their forwards and their PG need to be in the paint to be effective. Meyers fits well with them as he can defend in the paint and space the floor on offense. On the flip side what we lack is a consistent 3rd scorer and in particular a guy who can score in the paint. If we had the trio of Lillard/MCollum/Monroe every night we have a much more balanced inside out game. We don't lose a ton on D either.

If we could somehow get MCW as a rotation with CJ and Dame too that could be interesting, but the additional asking price Crabbe?
 
MIL has a lot of players that interest me. How do they not win? Sad that the sum of their parts don't work. I would also take Henson. He is who I think management wanted Leonard to be but it hasn't worked out that way.
 
BlazerDuckSeahawkFan94 said:
Henson just inked a deal. 10+ mil a year
Click to expand...
Yes. 11 per I believe. However, and I know this is going to sound crazy, but he is worth it. He doesn't get as many minutes as he should on that team because they have a lot of bigs but his advanced stats are crazy good. Like top 5 defender, blocker, rebounder good. If you think Leonard can get 10-12 MIL a year this summer then what is wrong with Henson's contract?
 
KeepOnRollin said:
MIL has a lot of players that interest me. How do they not win? Sad that the sum of their parts don't work. I would also take Henson. He is who I think management wanted Leonard to be but it hasn't worked out that way.
Click to expand...

Not enough outside shooting IMO.
 
KeepOnRollin said:
Yes. 11 per I believe. However, and I know this is going to sound crazy, but he is worth it. He doesn't get as many minutes as he should on that team because they have a lot of bigs but his advanced stats are crazy good. Like top 5 defender, blocker, rebounder good. If you think Leonard can get 10-12 MIL a year this summer then what is wrong with Henson's contract?
Click to expand...
The real question is, where does Henson fit here offensively? We can't play him at the 4 with Plumlee and Aminu with him as frontcourt buddies.
 
BlazerDuckSeahawkFan94 said:
The real question is, where does Henson fit here offensively? We can't play him at the 4 with Plumlee and Aminu with him as frontcourt buddies.
Click to expand...
I don't think Stotts is here forever. Eventually we will change the system. But to answer your question I think his better position is Center. Plumlee off the bench or moved down the road but for now Henson off the bench is also fine.
 
JFizzleRaider said:
Leonard can hit the three. And Vonleh can too (he did In college).

And you're eating 8 million per year into our cap space next year.

No no no no no no no
Click to expand...
Yeah, I can't see us takin on Frye and his contract, he's really not something we need now and especially in the future
 
Bringing in Henson and the ways to make that work (shuffling the roster and rotation significantly/ assuming Stotts will leave/) sure sounds a while lot like trying to reinvent a wheel that isn't broken. Getting Monroe and plugging him in next to plumlee is easier and upsets less of the overall structure and plan for the team.
 
Schilly said:
Bringing in Henson and the ways to make that work (shuffling the roster and rotation significantly/ assuming Stotts will leave/) sure sounds a while lot like trying to reinvent a wheel that isn't broken. Getting Monroe and plugging him in next to plumlee is easier and upsets less of the overall structure and plan for the team.
Click to expand...
Monroe and Plumlee are way more alike then Henson and Plumlee. Monroe's best position is also Center. He can play PF but he wouldn't play next to Plumlee in the starting lineup (likely Plumlee would be benched in that scenario)

Monroe is not a good defender like Henson. Plumlee is also below average defender. It would be a nightmare having both those guys start.
 
KeepOnRollin said:
I don't think Stotts is here forever. Eventually we will change the system. But to answer your question I think his better position is Center. Plumlee off the bench or moved down the road but for now Henson off the bench is also fine.
Click to expand...
Henson could be a good 5 in the mold of Whiteside but if I'm being completely honest, I like what Plumlee brings as our center, he has a unique skill set. I think Vonleh or a big name FA (Horford?) would be a better idea for our frontcourt.
 
BlazerDuckSeahawkFan94 said:
Henson could be a good 5 in the mold of Whiteside but if I'm being completely honest, I like what Plumlee brings as our center, he has a unique skill set. I think Vonleh or a big name FA (Horford?) would be a better idea for our frontcourt.
Click to expand...
Why would Horford at Super MAX (in the new CAP this summer) be better for us then Henson at 11 MIL? Just curious on that one....
 
KeepOnRollin said:
Why would Horford at Super MAX (in the new CAP this summer) be better for us then Henson at 11 MIL? Just curious on that one....
Click to expand...
Horford offensively is a really good #3 option that we are looking for. He also isn't a slouch defensively. We need a two way frontcourt man, Horford is the most obtainable near elite big man we can land this summer.
 
BlazerDuckSeahawkFan94 said:
Horford offensively is a really good #3 option that we are looking for. He also isn't a slouch defensively. We need a two way frontcourt man, Horford is the most obtainable near elite big man we can land this summer.
Click to expand...
Sounds like a pipe dream but I good with trying it and moving on to option #2 after it doesn't work.
 
KeepOnRollin said:
So Parsons or you have someone else in mind? And then when he turns us down? I not trying to sound depressing on purpose but dang they are long shots. Wish they weren't.
Click to expand...
I think Parsons is a real possibility
 
I'd love to have Channing Frye back on the team. I'm not altogether sure how he would be an improvement, maybe as backfill for pieces going out in a different trade?
 
KeepOnRollin said:
Monroe and Plumlee are way more alike then Henson and Plumlee. Monroe's best position is also Center. He can play PF but he wouldn't play next to Plumlee in the starting lineup (likely Plumlee would be benched in that scenario)

Monroe is not a good defender like Henson. Plumlee is also below average defender. It would be a nightmare having both those guys start.
Click to expand...

Any chance Plumlee is a better defender against PF's then he is against bigger centers?
 
Pinwheel1 said:
Any chance Plumlee is a better defender against PF's then he is against bigger centers?
Click to expand...
You would think he could be. Although he doesn't move all that well laterally so if they were on the perimeter then I don't think it would work.
 
BlazerDuckSeahawkFan94 said:
Parsons/Barnes/Bazemore

We can land one of those.
Click to expand...
Bazemore isn't better than Crabbe imo. Would rather play him some minutes at SF it came down to it. Barnes is a no go at Super MAX for me personally. Iggy at 11 MIL is someone I would rather have then Barnes at 18 MIL plus. Parsons is a get. And someone I would like to get. But a lot of teams will want him. Lets hope something Olshey says sells him.
 
BlazerDuckSeahawkFan94 said:
Horford offensively is a really good #3 option that we are looking for. He also isn't a slouch defensively. We need a two way frontcourt man, Horford is the most obtainable near elite big man we can land this summer.
Click to expand...
Horford will be 30 in June, his max will "begin" at 25 mil, no friggin way do I want to pay a 30 yr old Al 25 mil per, no thanks
 
KeepOnRollin said:
Bazemore isn't better than Crabbe imo. Would rather play him some minutes at SF it came down to it. Barnes is a no go at Super MAX for me personally. Iggy at 11 MIL is someone I would rather have then Barnes at 18 MIL plus. Parsons is a get. And someone I would like to get. But a lot of teams will want him. Lets hope something Olshey says sells him.
Click to expand...
I like your thinking and you have to think money/value in these crazy contract times. Lillard got 25 mil and CJ may easily get 20 mil plus, you have to have a blend and pick carefully the guys you pay big bucks, a bad mistake can cripple you.
 
KeepOnRollin said:
Bazemore isn't better than Crabbe imo. Would rather play him some minutes at SF it came down to it. Barnes is a no go at Super MAX for me personally. Iggy at 11 MIL is someone I would rather have then Barnes at 18 MIL plus.
Click to expand...
Barnes is a good shooter, can put the ball on the floor, is athletic and is a decent defender. He just needs to be on a team that will allow him more touches. He is a guy that can give you ~17 a night given the chance.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Shooter
Frye to Phoenix?
Replies
16
Views
2K
Tince
Tince
ABM
Channing Frye: What's The Deal??
2
Replies
39
Views
2K
Boob-No-More
Boob-No-More
B-Roy
Channing Frye joining NBC Sports NW
Replies
17
Views
980
CupWizier
CupWizier
Boise Blazer
Channing Frye: Explosive?
Replies
23
Views
2K
Boob-No-More
Boob-No-More
Blazer4ever
Could Sean Marks be the next Channing Frye?
Replies
15
Views
1K
Blazer4ever
Blazer4ever

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top