Politics CHARLIE KIRK SHOT IN UTAH

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
SlyPokerDog said:
Nothing to do with Kirk, I just didn't know you could make syrup from the local maple trees.

Click to expand...


Ha, I just subscribed to that guy. It boggles my mind that he has almost 2 million subs...I watched his video not knowing who he was or anything and was 100% convinced he was some rank amateur based on the quality and delivery of his videos.
 
Rastapopoulos said:
Click to expand...


I'm not going to just accept this as fact....but the circumstantial evidence is pretty solid

supposedly, a family friend says he was to the left, but she also used the term "leftist' which is pretty suspicious
 
wizenheimer said:
I'm not going to just accept this as fact....but the circumstantial evidence is pretty solid

supposedly, a family friend says he was to the left, but she also used the term "leftist' which is pretty suspicious
Click to expand...

Yeah, the only people who use the term "leftist" are people who A: don't actually know what someone who is liberal or progressive stands for and B: is full of shit.
 
Does anyone here without looking it up know who Vance Bolter is?
 
The only reason we’re talking about any of these fools is that they were able to use guns to kill famous people. Maybe just take the guns away from fools?
 
When it was a radical left.... DEATH!

Now that it's not...

9gbafiyngsof1.jpeg
 
riverman said:
In my opinion scientific method cannot function within the constraints of fundementalist religious belief...that's where science is divided. Demonstrable science require proof of a supreme being and heaven or hell. An actual scientist cannot accept these beliefs blindly without proof. We have many diverse ideologies masking as "science" driven that are actually dogmatically driven. Some may define a UFO as an angel and some as an alien interstellar being.
Click to expand...
This is like in CONTACT with Jodie Foster right?
 
riverman said:
This is where you need criminal psychologists to study how we got to this point. .
Click to expand...
Shit we need criminal psychologists to study some members on this forum. reading some of these takes.
 
People don’t want to hear this but there are quite a few groypers in and around the government now.
 
julius said:
I don't know how anyone, with a straight face (no pun intended) can deny that they've infiltrated the GOP.
Click to expand...
Was it Trump who called Kirk a moderate? Vance? That framing of Kirk is the dogwhistle of a groyper.
 
JFizzleRaider said:
One thing that is really annoying is when friends or family say "I just don't want to talk politics."

I'm sorry, the rights of people I love are not "politics."

People say that because it allows them to disassociate from their hurtful decisions.
Click to expand...
Nah, I don’t agree with this. My wife and I never talk politics. I’ve shared before that I read 99.9% of my political or hot topic news here.
When it comes to people in my daily life, I don’t care what they think about politics or religion to be honest. It’s not my job to listen to their opinions or give them mine. Sounds corny, but I just try to treat everyone in my day to day with peace and love FAMS! Not the dorks on here of course, but real people for sure!
 
THE HCP said:
Nah, I don’t agree with this. My wife and I never talk politics. I’ve shared before that I read 99.9% of my political or hot topic news here.
When it comes to people in my daily life, I don’t care what they think about politics or religion to be honest. It’s not my job to listen to their opinions or give them mine. Sounds corny, but I just try to treat everyone in my day to day with peace and love FAMS! Not the dorks on here of course, but real people for sure!
Click to expand...

I don't think you understood what they said.

Someone who thinks that others should not be afforded the same rights as everyone else, is not politics. That's outright hate and control.
 
Everything Beagle said:
Was it Trump who called Kirk a moderate? Vance? That framing of Kirk is the dogwhistle of a groyper.
Click to expand...

I subscribe to a guy who is from the NW (lives in Washington state actually). Wranglerstar.

For the most part, I like his home steading stuff and kind of avoid his (rare) politically based posts. But yesterday (or maybe it was early today) he had a post about how it's a "war" between right and wrong, and how liberals are in the wrong (etc)...

And what should be a surprise to no one, most of the responses were in lockstep agreement. Which is sad, because these same guys went stone cold silent when it started to sound like the suspect wasn't a trans/left/antifa/progressive loon, and more than likely was someone who they all would welcome with open arms in their communities.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top