Politics CHARLIE KIRK SHOT IN UTAH

[SlyPokerDog]

 

[jonnyboy]

No understanding of verbatim quotes or context here.

 

[jonnyboy]

Tim Walz had Hortman killed is goofier.

Didn’t even know that one was being floated.

 

[SlyPokerDog]

 

[SlyPokerDog]

 

[BigGameDamian]

 

[Strenuus]

The irony of this is if the right said all these "hateful" things about one of ours getting assassinated, itd be like

"Yeah. She wanted fair pay, health insurance for all, and yes equal rights. Imagine being mad about someone wanting that. You should be fired for actually being hateful". Lol

 

[julius]

Did they follow it up by asking him who asked him to lower the flag for Charlie Kirk?

 

[ehizzy3]

You tell her.

she flicked his hat? Wow lol hope she gets third degree assault.

Look at how he started whining like a baby when she did that lmao

 

[SlyPokerDog]

The Purge Begins: Vance and Miller Unveil Plan to ‘Dismantle’ the Left in Kirk’s Name

In a deeply cynical and sinister act of political theater, Vice President JD Vance and senior White House official Stephen Miller have guest-hosted the podcast of the recently assassinated Charlie Kirk. This was not a tribute or a memorial. It was a chilling propaganda event where the Trump administration officially unveiled its plan to use the Kirk tragedy as a pretext for a full-scale, violent purge of its political enemies. This is the Reichstag Fire playbook moving from rhetoric into its execution phase.

JD Vance opened the broadcast by immediately and baselessly blaming the assassination on an “incredibly destructive movement of left-wing extremism.” He then, without a hint of irony, declared that the path to “real unity” required the administration to “dismantle” this movement.

Let’s deconstruct this Orwellian doublespeak. This is the classic language of fascism. “Unity” is not achieved through democratic consensus or pluralism; it is achieved through the violent elimination of all internal opposition. The “real unity” Vance is promising is the unity of a one-party state, the unity of the graveyard, where all dissenting voices have been successfully “dismantled.” The premise for this purge—that political violence is an exclusively left-wing problem—is a flagrant and demonstrable lie, given the extensive and well-documented history of right-wing terrorism in this country, from the January 6th insurrection to the recent murders of Democratic lawmakers in Minnesota.

If Vance provided the Orwellian framing, Stephen Miller provided the chillingly explicit blueprint for the coming crackdown. Invoking Kirk’s “last message” to him, Miller declared his mission:

“We are going to channel all of the anger that we have over the organized campaign that led to this assassination to uproot and dismantle these terrorist networks… With God as my witness, we are going to use every resource we have at the Department of Justice, Homeland Security, and throughout this government to identify, disrupt, dismantle, and destroy these networks.“

This is a declaration of war by the state against half of its own population. Miller is explicitly vowing to weaponize the entire security and intelligence apparatus of the United States government against American citizens for political purposes. He is reclassifying the entire political opposition—from protesters to journalists to online critics—as a “vast domestic terror movement” that must be “destroyed.” This is not a political debate; this is the language of a purge.

The true danger lies in the intentionally vague and all-encompassing definition of who belongs to this “terror movement.” Miller cites “organized doxing campaigns,” “campaigns of dehumanization,” and “messaging that’s designed to trigger incite violence.”

Who decides what constitutes “dehumanization” or “incitement”? The Trump administration. In the current MAGA-led panic, we have already seen online campaigns to dox and harass people for simply criticizing Charlie Kirk’s political views. This proves that their goal is not to stop violence; it is to silence all dissent. The net will be cast as widely as possible. Any media outlet, any advocacy group, any individual who criticizes the regime can and will be swept up under this broad definition and targeted by the full might of the state.

The mask is off. The Vance and Miller podcast was not a memorial; it was a political rally where the administration laid out its plan for an authoritarian crackdown for all to see. They are cynically weaponizing a national tragedy to justify a political purge, and they have told us exactly how they plan to do it.

https://brokeonomics.news/2025/09/1...eil-plan-to-dismantle-the-left-in-kirks-name/

 

[crandc]

Who knows what is meant by this amorphous "left"? I think they are looking ahead to 2026 and 2028. They are very unpopular and partisan redistricting might not be enough. Threaten anyone who donates money, campaigns for or simply endorses opponent. Trump already said he will retaliate against New York City if they elect Zohran Mamdani.

 

[SlyPokerDog]

 

[julius]

They call for that on a weekly basis. Some other tragedy will come up and they'll talk about something else. Then we'll find out actually what his politics are, and if he's conservative/whackadoodle, they'll bring up something unrelated.

Rinse and repeat.

 

[SlyPokerDog]

 

[julius]

I can't wait for the entire story to come out. And not just about this.

There is no way there isn't a puppet master somewhere.

 

[SlyPokerDog]

 

[wizenheimer]

these corrupt lying sacks of right wing maggot shit are teeing up a an attempt at martial law and a coup against the constitution.

 

[Phatguysrule]

these corrupt lying sacks of right wing maggot shit are teeing up a an attempt at martial law and a coup against the constitution.

100%

 

[Natebishop3]

 

[Phatguysrule]

 

[sheed30]

Not looking good for the trans community. Looks like some people definitely knew what was up. Like the roommate knew and shared some info about when it was going down.

not a good look at all if that's true....

We have seen a lot more people celebrate Kirk's death, mock him and etc. it's a larger % than some have claimed.

If anything that's pushing people away from the left, (even if you want to say Kirk's killer is not on the left) as many have claimed they are done with the left after all of this...

 

[bulls_with_booz]

not a good look at all if that's true....

We have seen a lot more people celebrate Kirk's death, mock him and etc. it's a larger % than some have claimed.

If anything that's pushing people away from the left, (even if you want to say Kirk's killer is not on the left) as many have claimed they are done with the left after all of this...

As usual, the deeply entrenched on either side get the most attention. But we overlook how many people will be turned off from politics in general by all of this. They (pick whoever your they is) killed the free speech guy who was actually a government mouthpiece and you have to treat the death of a complete stranger as a life changing event or potentially lose your job. And they can't get the narrative straight on the shooter's motives either.

 

[crandc]

I haven't seen anyone celebrating. I have seen people question whether official mourning, not to mention firing anyone who criticizes him, is appropriate for unrepentant racist, misogynist, homophobic transphobic bigoted private citizen who glorified gun culture.

 

[crandc]

I did see celebrating when Paul Pelosi was beaten nearly to death with a hammer.

 

[sheed30]

I haven't seen anyone celebrating. I have seen people question whether official mourning, not to mention firing anyone who criticizes him, is appropriate for unrepentant racist, misogynist, homophobic transphobic bigoted private citizen who glorified gun culture.

Is this a sarcastic post? You dont see anyone celebrating his death but you saw people celebrating Paul Pelosi’s near death? What?

odd post right here.

 

[crandc]

Is this a sarcastic post? You dont see anyone celebrating his death but you saw people celebrating Paul Pelosi’s near death? What?

odd post right here.

This is not sarcastic. I have seen people point out Kirk does not merit all this posthumous adoration but at the same time condemn the killing.

When Paul Pelosi was assaulted there were jokes from all over conservative media, podcasters, Don Jr. among others.

 

[MickZagger]

I don’t even associate religion with being a good person anymore.

I’ve came to that conclusion after this Charlie Kirk thing. It’s all a big facade.

 

[wizenheimer]

https://www.adl.org/resources/report/murder-and-extremism-united-states-2022

(335 right wing murders vs 18 left wing murders)

***********************************************************************



https://www.start.umd.edu/profiles-individual-radicalization-united-states-pirus-keshif

************************************************************

needs to be out there because JD Vance is lying thru his teeth and actually claiming the left has committed most of the violent acts

 

[Natebishop3]

I haven't seen anyone celebrating. I have seen people question whether official mourning, not to mention firing anyone who criticizes him, is appropriate for unrepentant racist, misogynist, homophobic transphobic bigoted private citizen who glorified gun culture.

A city council member in my area resigned because he posted that Kirk being shot brightened his day. There are definitely people celebrating his death. You don't have to look very far.

 

[crandc]

Attorney General Pam Bondi declared hate speech directed against Kirk is a crime (but not against immigrants, trans people, Muslims.. ). Also Department of Injustice will prosecute any small business that refuses demand to display Kirk poster.