Rastapopoulos
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2008
- Messages
- 42,509
- Likes
- 26,900
- Points
- 113
Now do that with GMs.Maybe someone can look this up but how many coaches have been given 9 years with the same team and not brought that team to the finals?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Now do that with GMs.Maybe someone can look this up but how many coaches have been given 9 years with the same team and not brought that team to the finals?
a lot of it is public.No, I wasn’t disagreeing you, I was impressed with your vocab. As far as TP goes, I heard some bad stuff from one of his staff members about how he treated people. Not a fan.
That's disappointing.As far as TP goes, I heard some bad stuff from one of his staff members about how he treated people. Not a fan.
Now do that with GMs.
From rebuild to result (result being making the finals) I would give GMs and Coaches 6 years if I was a team owner.
Anybody can look good in a press conference. Well, except Olshey.jesus, that is a ridiculous comparison and one 5 minute press conference from chauncey would show you that.
Utah played in the finals.
In his tenth and eleventh seasons as the head coach. Through nine seasons they had been further in the playoffs more consistently than we were with Stotts and had won games in the conference finals. I wanted Stotts fired for a long time but the only other coach that got as long of a rope without finals appearances was Sloan.Sloan had his team in two consecutive Finals in the 90s.
Sloan had his team in two consecutive Finals in the 90s.
In his tenth and eleventh seasons as the head coach. Through nine seasons they had been further in the playoffs more consistently than we were with Stotts and had won games in the conference finals. I wanted Stotts fired for a long time but the only other coach that got as long of a rope without finals appearances was Sloan.
If I owned the team I would have changed both coach and GM before this offseason.
good to know. but it was a different era and sloan still had way more success both in the playoffs and regular season. the premise of stotts' departure is still that he was here way too long and his firing was long due.In his tenth and eleventh seasons as the head coach. Through nine seasons they had been further in the playoffs more consistently than we were with Stotts and had won games in the conference finals. I wanted Stotts fired for a long time but the only other coach that got as long of a rope without finals appearances was Sloan.
See!? I KNEW we fired Stotts too soon!In his tenth and eleventh seasons as the head coach.
Anybody can look good in a press conference. Well, except Olshey.
Utah played in the finals.
From rebuild to result (result being making the finals) I would give GMs and Coaches 6 years if I was a team owner.
No, try something else first. Ideally, trading for an all star.So trade Dame, then.
Right... I wouldn't have given either of them that long. It's ridiculous. There are only 30 NBA head coaching jobs in the world, these guys should be held to a higher standard than both of these coaches were. I am in no way excusing keeping Stotts by pointing out that Sloan got the same extended chance. Sloan as beloved as he is in Utah, never delivered a championship.good to know. but it was a different era and sloan still had way more success both in the playoffs and regular season. the premise of stotts' departure is still that he was here way too long and his firing was long due.
It was time to try something different.
We were getting nowhere and wasting the talent of the greatest Trail Blazer ever.
Stotts is a good coach.
But again, it was time to try something different.
For Simmos?So trade Dame, then.
Also the biggest thing being lost here is that in the history of the league only one other team, in one other instance showed the kind of inactivity that we showed with Stotts. Virtually unprecedented and Sloan had far more playoff wins. So the length of Stotts' tenure here coupled with his lack of performance was totally unprecedented. He's gone now though so we should all be able to move on.
I have no problems with replacing TS after all this time, but he never was the main problem and anyone that thinks so has his head stuck in the sand.
"Anyone who doesn't agree with me is an idiot."
Usually not something a person in the right has to resort to.
Maybe someone can look this up but how many coaches have been given 9 years with the same team and not brought that team to the finals?
Trying to identify the main problem isn't a hard thing to do. Olshey whether it's fair to judge him for it or not, let Aldridge walk for nothing, Olshey crippled the team with bad spending, if Stotts was a problem (which I think he was) Olshey kept that problem around way too long, and Olshey has never made the big trade or signing necessary to get Dame the help he needs. Olshey is the main problem and has been the main problem... even if Stotts was the biggest problem his employment was Olshey's responsibility so again Olshey can reasonably be considered the main problem.Do you think TS ever had the kind of roster (relative to the rest of the league) that JS had in Utah? I would argue that him making it as far as he managed with such a flawed and undermanned roster is less of an indictment of his coaching prowess than the fact that it took JS that long to get a much better roster that far.
That's just my opinion. I have no problems with replacing TS after all this time, but he never was the main problem and anyone that thinks so has his head stuck in the sand.
Correct. Do you believe the Blazers had the roster in any of the years TS was the head coach to make it to the finals?
