Cj trade article.

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
Cippy91

Cippy91

Habitual Line Stepper
Joined
Jul 7, 2014
Messages
9,667
Likes
7,049
Points
113
Lol. Don't know if he liked this tweet out of sarcasm or what but some idiotic fans we have as well as the media just love chasing players out of town

 
Last edited by a moderator:
ripcityboy said:
Calling Canzano an ass hats is an offense to ass hats everywhere. In fact, the word ass is too limiting when describing his personality.

Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I clearly see and understand your objection.
 
Trail Blazers general manager Neil Olshey showed up for the Kentucky-Mississippi State game in Lexington on Tuesday night according to an NBA scout who was present.

The Blazers hold a lottery-protected first-round pick in June's NBA Draft. And when the scout let on that Olshey made the trip, he added, "It was 24 degrees there. Neil's apparently not (bleeping) around."

Meaning, Olshey is acting like he wants to use that potential lottery pick.

Falls in line with ownership, too. Paul Allen loves the draft. It's what gets his juices going. Even as Portland could be one of the few teams willing to take on "dead money", the smart bet is on Portland missing the playoffs and keeping its lottery protected pick. I'm just not sure it's the best available move.

The Blazers remain $13 million below the salary floor, and are sitting just four games in the loss column out of the No. 8 spot in the playoffs. The Feb. 18 NBA Trade deadline is looming and for those holding out hope that Portland may try to alter its future by obtaining a front-line player at the deadline, there's a move that could be made.

CJ McCollum (20.9 points per game) is putting together a nice bounce-back season. At $2.5 million annually he's currently a terrific value. But anyone who has watched McCollum play when paired with Damian Lillard knows that you can't play them successfully together on a team that will compete at the top of the Western Conference.

That's the goal, right?

They can score together, but they're a defensive disaster when paired. They're both chuckers, too. And there's no way that Olshey is trading Lillard, his prized draft pick. Further, the Blazers don't want to get into a position beyond the 2016-17 season where they have to pay both Lillard and McCollum.

They're not the "Splash Brothers." We know that. But we don't want them to become the "Cash Brothers."

Even as Olshey has a man-crush on McCollum, and has privately said he wouldn't dream of trading him, the general manager should be looking and listening when it comes to offers for the guard between now and Feb. 18.

Portland also has a potential first-round lottery pick as trade bait (but theoretically would have to wait until the draft to make that deal). And even as Olshey feels stuck on a refusal to part with any of his future draft picks, the Blazers general manager should be quietly shopping McCollum, gauging his trade value. If the return resulted in a front-line player who would start for multiple seasons and better complement Lillard, you'd have to consider making it.

To be clear, I'm not saying "McCollum must go," here. I like his game. Just not as much as Olshey does. I'm saying, McCollum's value isn't going to be greater than it is in the next two seasons. It's just not sustainable. Also, I'm saying that this season shouldn't just be viewed as a throw away in which the Blazers roll out a the lowest-paid roster in the league and pretend that's all there is to see.

The prevailing strategy among league GMs at the deadline is now centered around preserving cap space. There are few teams willing to take on long-term contracts and money. Portland is one of them, potentially. It feels like it's uniquely positioned to be one of the few buyers should a front-line player be available at the deadline.

It's risky business to make a move that could leave Allen out of the first round of the draft. Maybe that's too much risk for Olshey. There's further risk in trading away a player who has demonstrated his ability to perform, as McCollum has. But if the Blazers really are going to get somewhere big, it's exactly the kind of thinking they need to adopt.

I'm glad Olshey was in Lexington, scouting college players. But while he's there, I'm hoping he was eyeing the No. 8 playoff spot, wondering what it will take to get this franchise into the postseason.

--- @JohnCanzanoBFT

http://www.oregonlive.com/sports/or...tml#incart_2box_sports_oregonian_john_canzano
 
SlyPokerDog said:
They can score together, but they're a defensive disaster when paired. They're both chuckers, too. And there's no way that Olshey is trading Lillard, his prized draft pick. Further, the Blazers don't want to get into a position beyond the 2016-17 season where they have to pay both Lillard and McCollum.

They're not the "Splash Brothers." We know that. But we don't want them to become the "Cash Brothers."
Click to expand...

Canzano's radio ratings and page views must be down.
 
His condescending attitude is probably the worst thing about the whole thing.
 
Yes, let's eye #8 seed in this year's playoffs at the expense of our future. Grand idea.
 
julius said:
His condescending attitude is probably the worst thing about the whole thing.
Click to expand...
Yep. Canzano is a good writer as far as grammar and technique goes. However, he lacks subtlety and has not figured out how to be objective and keep his deeply held opinions out of his pieces. Everyone here at S2 has their own opinions and we are all also human and that comes with positives and negatives. I like to think of Canzano as a conglomeration of every bad trait that every poster has. None of the positives. Just all of the strange shitty outliers combined into one giant shit sandwich, wrapped in shit bacon and deep-fried in shit oil. Served on a bed of steamed shit greens and garnished with a shit/balsamic reduction.
 
theprunetang said:
Yep. Canzano is a good writer as far as grammar and technique goes. However, he lacks subtlety and has not figured out how to be objective and keep his deeply held opinions out of his pieces. Everyone here at S2 has their own opinions and we are all also human and that comes with positives and negatives. I like to think of Canzano as a conglomeration of every bad trait that every poster has. None of the positives. Just all of the strange shitty outliers combined into one giant shit sandwich, wrapped in shit bacon and deep-fried in shit oil. Served on a bed of steamed shit greens and garnished with a shit/balsamic reduction.
Click to expand...
Beautiful. Couldn't have put it better.

Sent from my SGH-M919 using Tapatalk
 
So he writesthis article saying we should push for playoffs. Let's remember this when we are in playoff position at end of the year, or close, and he writes about how Olshey failed us, because what we need was a high draft pick, not a 1 and done, and how we're in purgatory and blah blah blah. Classic troll.
 
SlyPokerDog said:
Canzano's radio ratings and page views must be down.
Click to expand...

Jay Mohr said the other day on his show that his Portland ratings are double that of any other show in his timeslot--which includes Canzano. If true, I imagine that would be a blow to the bald one's ego.
 
CJ is having a bounce back season? And it isn't sustainable?

You'd think if he was bouncing back to his norm as he makes it sound it would be somewhat sustainable.

Apparently the one thing that is sustainable is a guy pulling articles out of his ass and keeping his job.
 
Nothing wrong with saying it should be "explored" any good GM would be always looking at options. But the real question is trade him for who? Even if we end up paying him big bucks, he'll still have trade value as a scorer.
 
theprunetang said:
Yep. Canzano is a good writer as far as grammar and technique goes. However, he lacks subtlety and has not figured out how to be objective and keep his deeply held opinions out of his pieces. Everyone here at S2 has their own opinions and we are all also human and that comes with positives and negatives. I like to think of Canzano as a conglomeration of every bad trait that every poster has. None of the positives. Just all of the strange shitty outliers combined into one giant shit sandwich, wrapped in shit bacon and deep-fried in shit oil. Served on a bed of steamed shit greens and garnished with a shit/balsamic reduction.
Click to expand...

Yello, here's the thing. Crapzano is a columnist, ie; someone paid for their opinions. Like it or not, shit sandwich's deliver hits.
 
SlyPokerDog said:
I really like CJ but if we could include Canzano in the trade I would strongly consider it.
Click to expand...

I'm rusty on the trade provisions of the new CBA, but isn't there a clause requiring that we take back Screamin' A. Smith?
 
HailBlazers said:
Yello, here's the thing. Crapzano is a columnist, ie; someone paid for their opinions. Like it or not, shit sandwich's deliver hits.
Click to expand...

This is true. But none the less I have never disliked any Columnist more than him. And to be honest I am not sure why I hate his work so much. I just always do. Even when I agree with the premise of his "opinion". But somehow after reading some part of his article, I usually find myself thinking ...."he is just quoting some dumb ass fan and pretending it is his opinion". He never really sells me on his logic. I just don't think he really should be writing about sports.

Maybe if I didn't know what he sounded like on the radio I would respect his work more.......
 
Pinwheel1 said:
This is true. But none the less I have never disliked any Columnist more than him. And to be honest I am not sure why I hate his work so much. I just always do. Even when I agree with the premise of his "opinion". But somehow after reading some part of his article, I usually find myself thinking ...."he is just quoting some dumb ass fan and pretending it is his opinion". He never really sells me on his logic. I just don't think he really should be writing about sports.

Maybe if I didn't know what he sounded like on the radio I would respect his work more.......
Click to expand...

And it's not an act. He really IS that big of a tool in person.
 
Stupid idea.....at this point. He's the Robin to Lillard's Batman act. He's ranking with top guards. Nothing to dislike.

Wouldn't it be better to accept him and his limitations, and instead improve other positions of weakness (like SF and PF) and improve the team?
But yes, if Pelican's want CJ and will give us A Davis.....we'll accept. ; )
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Dan Marang
Who would you trade CJ McCollum for?
6 7 8
Replies
218
Views
13K
Natebishop3
Natebishop3
TBpup
  • Poll Poll
The Ringer: CJ for Aaron Gordon
4 5 6
Replies
174
Views
11K
hoopsjock
hoopsjock
KingSpeed
So what do we think of Coach Stotts?
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
blue9
blue9
PDXFonz
Lillard told he can't play game in Philippines, still puts on show for fans!
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
SlyPokerDog
SlyPokerDog
B
Crabbe or CJ?
2 3
Replies
62
Views
3K
barfo
barfo

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top