Rumor claim on offer for Chandler

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
Wizard Mentor said:
Afflalo apparently has the same agent as CJ and they both play SG, so the thought is that Afflalo's agent wouldn't have him re-sign with the Blazers. Chandler plays SF and has a team option for another year, hence the interest in Chandler. Chandler plays D and multiple positions. If we don't get Chandler, we're going after Prince.
Click to expand...
Afflalo plays D can play SG/SF and guards multiple positions as well as being a better shooter. Afflalo/CJ having the same agent is kind of overblown imo especially when Afflalo has a player option for next year which people expect him to use but why would he use it this year when next year is when the giant 25+ million cap increase happens and all contracts people sign after that will be significantly increased. Seems like Afflalo would potentially be leaving money on the table to use his player option.
 
Rhal said:
Afflalo plays D can play SG/SF and guards multiple positions as well as being a better shooter. Afflalo/CJ having the same agent is kind of overblown imo especially when Afflalo has a player option for next year which people expect him to use but why would he use it this year when next year is when the giant 25+ million cap increase happens and all contracts people sign after that will be significantly increased. Seems like Afflalo would potentially be leaving money on the table to use his player option.
Click to expand...
This season, Afflalo is shooting the same as Chandler. Chandler is much better defensively, and as BNM posted, Chandler's net rating is much better than Afflalo.

If you score 10 points, but give up 10 points, then what's the point?
 
magnifier661 said:
This season, Afflalo is shooting the same as Chandler. Chandler is much better defensively, and as BNM posted, Chandler's net rating is much better than Afflalo.

If you score 10 points, but give up 10 points, then what's the point?
Click to expand...
Afflalo isnt having the greatest year shooting but over his career he has been a better shooter and defender then Chandler. Afflalo is only 29 so he hasnt fallen off a cliff because of age.
If i recall correctly CBS's Denver reporter talkes about Afflalo also spending a lot of time defending PGs because Lawson isnt great at it and there are a hell of a lot better PGs then SFs in this league so if Afflalo is spending his nights guarding whoever is better the PG or SG then of course his net is going to be bad especially when compared to an above average player in a spot that after you take out the super stars who play it then the talent pool dries up fast.
 
That's tbpup and he posts here.

So....... LOL S2!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Tbpup bolding taking that step into "deal coming soon" territory.
 
BlazerWookee said:
HA! IN YOUR FACE!

Wait. Is that a personal attack? Just in case...

HA! IN YOUR POST'S FACE!
Click to expand...

Sorry, but you can't use "HA!" like that on this board without posting this:

jin.jpg
 
Natebishop3 said:
Nah, tbpup had "hold onto your shorts" at the same time as "deal coming soon."


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I thought I remembered him getting thrown under the bus for bad information previously but couldnt remember. Thanks.
 
Can someone please explain to me what the fuck is wrong with you even considering this trade? Do you not understand basketball? Not trying to be provocative here, I'm actually asking this pretty seriously.
How do you wish to replace 2 young studs with endless potential who sit patiently at the end of the bench without even pouting, just because they have a loser coach who doesn't understand basketball for a fact, then replace them with an aging, over the hill, ok at best, meh swingman?! Then you want to also add a 1st rounder and you say that's a good trade?
 
Blazer4ever said:
Can someone please explain to me what the fuck is wrong with you even considering this trade? Do you not understand basketball? Not trying to be provocative here, I'm actually asking this pretty seriously.
How do you wish to replace 2 young studs with endless potential who sit patiently at the end of the bench without pouting, just because they have a loser coach who doesn't understand basketball for a fact, then replace them with an aging, over the hill, ok at best, meh swingman?! Then you want to also add a 1st rounder and you say that's a good trade?
What do I have to deal with here? is it racism? what is it? blindness? do you have shit for eyes? what is going on?
Click to expand...

Will Barton has endless potential?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
While I wouldn't put it as harshly as the gentleman above, I also am not enamored with the rumored deal but it has almost everything to do with the pick. It is overpaying for some of Chandlers ilk.
 
Blazer4ever said:
Can someone please explain to me what the fuck is wrong with you even considering this trade? Do you not understand basketball? Not trying to be provocative here, I'm actually asking this pretty seriously.
How do you wish to replace 2 young studs with endless potential who sit patiently at the end of the bench without even pouting, just because they have a loser coach who doesn't understand basketball for a fact, then replace them with an aging, over the hill, ok at best, meh swingman?! Then you want to also add a 1st rounder and you say that's a good trade?
Click to expand...
I can't remember, are you the same poster who was crying when we extended Leonard but not Robinson?
 
JFizzleRaider said:
Tbpup bolding taking that step into "deal coming soon" territory.
Click to expand...
Wonder why he isn't posting that here.

Maybe it's because we would rip him apart if it didn't come true again. Only so many times you can cry wolf...
 
Blazer4ever said:
Can someone please explain to me what the fuck is wrong with you even considering this trade? Do you not understand basketball? Not trying to be provocative here, I'm actually asking this pretty seriously.
How do you wish to replace 2 young studs with endless potential who sit patiently at the end of the bench without even pouting, just because they have a loser coach who doesn't understand basketball for a fact, then replace them with an aging, over the hill, ok at best, meh swingman?! Then you want to also add a 1st rounder and you say that's a good trade?
Click to expand...

Describing yourself? You know more than Stotts and Olshey about basketball? GTFO.....
 
RR7 said:
I can't remember, are you the same poster who was crying when we extended Leonard but not Robinson?
Click to expand...
Yes. Yes he is. He has a much higher opinion of Robinson than EVERYONE else. Which is why this proposed deal doesn't appeal to him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RR7
yuyuza1 said:
Wonder why he isn't posting that here.

Maybe it's because we would rip him apart if it didn't come true again. Only so many times you can cry wolf...
Click to expand...

He posted the "hold onto your shorts" rumor over on realgm as well. That's his home base. We're just the girl on the side.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Blazer4ever said:
Can someone please explain to me what the fuck is wrong with you even considering this trade? Do you not understand basketball? Not trying to be provocative here, I'm actually asking this pretty seriously.
How do you wish to replace 2 young studs with endless potential who sit patiently at the end of the bench without even pouting, just because they have a loser coach who doesn't understand basketball for a fact, then replace them with an aging, over the hill, ok at best, meh swingman?! Then you want to also add a 1st rounder and you say that's a good trade?
Click to expand...
I honestly don't even know how to delve into a post like this. It is flawed on every single level.
 
RR7 said:
I can't remember, are you the same poster who was crying when we extended Leonard but not Robinson?
Click to expand...
He was definitely the one who said Dante Exum had Westbrook's explosiveness, with BRoy's skill, Ginobili's passing, and DRose's first step.

LMAO
 
  • Like
Reactions: RR7
yuyuza1 said:
He was definitely the one who said Dante Exum had Westbrook's explosiveness, with BRoy's skill, Ginobili's passing, and DRose's first step.

LMAO
Click to expand...
Then he realized he is 19 and played against Australian high school kids which is the equivalent to America's high school JV teams probably lol
 
IMO the only difference between Will being "The people's champ" and T-Rob being the greaetest bargain deal we've made in years like most people here saw them last year and how people see them this year is them not getting any fucking chance. They're still both very effective players with tremendous potential. If we keep winning I'm not going to cry about it but if we trade both plus a draft pick for Wilson fucking Chandler that's just stupid, that's just making a trade for the sake of making a trade, it would be shooting ourselves in the leg.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Scalma
Wilson Chandler
2
Replies
40
Views
2K
blue9
blue9
crowTrobot
OT Chandler to Thunder
2 3 4
Replies
105
Views
8K
MAS RipCity
MAS RipCity
Swoosh22
Knicks STILL interested in Rudy
Replies
24
Views
2K
santeesioux
santeesioux
T
Wilson Chandler to Philly
2
Replies
52
Views
3K
BonesJones
BonesJones
B-Roy
OT: Mavs get................Chandler?
Replies
17
Views
1K
Masbee
Masbee

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top