Contenders: What to shoot for

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

magnifier661

B-A-N-A-N-A-S!
Joined
Oct 2, 2009
Messages
59,328
Likes
5,588
Points
113
I was searching through other forums and found this interesting post.

http://www.city-data.com/forum/basketball/1825593-nba-finals-4-8-seeds-need.html

Here are the numbers, In the last 13 years, the only seeds to reach the conference finals were the #1-4 seeds. In the last 13 years a #4 seed has made it to the Finals only 2 twice and never won. In the last 13 years the #3 seed has only won 4 times, the rest were #1 and #2 seeds. In the modern NBA you have to be at least #4 seed to make it to the Conference Finals and at least #3 seed if you want any chance at winning a NBA Championship. Seeds #5-8 mean absolutely nothing and give you no chance at a NBA Finals appearance. Before everyone mentions the 1999 NY Knicks, it was a shorten season and albeit an outlier anyways. In the last 13 years a 5 seed hasn't even made it to the Conference Finals. In the last 13 years a 4 seed has made it to the conference finals only 5 times. In the last 13 years a 4 seed only has a made the eastern conference finals twice! and the western conference finals 3 times in the last 13 years.

It's hard to enjoy the NBA of you are not a 1-4 seed, a 5 seed statistically has the same outcome as an 8 seed. Even if your team is a 4 seed going into the playoffs you're really counting on only a %15 chance of making the NBA finals based upon the last 13 years. Yes one of these years a 4 seed will win a NBA Championship but in the current modern era It might be 25 years before it happens. Yes in 1995 the Rockets won the NBA Championship for the first time ever for a 6th Seed.

You have to go back to 1981 for a 6th seed to make it to the Finals before the 95 Rockets which it was the Rockets again and they lost that series 4-2 but even back then only 6 teams made the playoffs. You have to go back to 1978 when the other 4 seed made it to the NBA Finals which Seattle lost to the Bullets 4-3.

Maybe Lebron was right when he said maybe the NBA need to get rid of some teams, and maybe my Milwaukee Bucks is one of those teams. Milwaukee being the 2nd smallest media market at 2.5M maybe just doesn't provide enough support for an owner to make his team competitive.

Baseball, just make it to the playoffs, NFL, just make it to the playoffs, NHL, just make it to the playoffs

NBA just make it to the 1-2 seed to have a good chance at winning and a 3 seed for a good chance to make the Finals, 4 seed well, only a 15% chance on making the NBA Finals.

Maybe the NBA needs to cut 4 teams from each league, whatever they do nothing will be done until Stern is gone and his predecessor is a student of David Stern so I doubt much will change.

I think we need more parody in the NBA because right now, it's not that there isn't enough, there is none at all!

Read more: http://www.city-data.com/forum/basketball/1825593-nba-finals-4-8-seeds-need.html#ixzz2jKN7u5IT

I actually agree with him. The quest for a title is a top 3 seed. There have been a few anomalies, but the deciding seed should be 1-3. It seems obvious, but I think that's what this team really needs to shoot for. I think we have the personnel and philosophy to do it too!
 
It all comes back to the small markets vs.the large market teams
 
Explain San Antonio

tim.duncan.jpg
 
And? How is it small market vs. large market?

You wanted San Antonio explained. Tim Duncan explains it. So does David Robinson

They are in the 30's I think for market size......which is odd because the city is so big
 
You wanted San Antonio explained. Tim Duncan explains it. So does David Robinson

They are in the 30's I think for market size......which is odd because the city is so big

No, I wanted him to explain how "San Antonio" applies to this "Small Market vs. Large Market" did you ignore the response to the quote?
 
Not surprising. The NBA is a superstar driven league and there are only a handful of superstars in the league. Teams with those superstars are going to win those top spots and until the NBA stops giving superstars special treatment by the refs then it will stay that way.

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk
 
Explain San Antonio

If your going to have a small market team win a championship it might as well be in Texas. I hate to say it but I do believe it is about location, Big and small markets. Name a team that has won the NBA finals outside the Texas area in the last 10 years. Then name 2 NBA teams that have played each other in the NBA Championship excluding large markets and that are not in the Texas area in the last 10 years.
 
If your going to have a small market team win a championship it might as well be in Texas. I hate to say it but I do believe it is about location, Big and small markets. Name a team that has won the NBA finals outside the Texas area in the last 10 years. Then name 2 NBA teams that have played each other in the NBA Championship excluding large markets and that are not in the Texas area in the last 10 years.

You completely back peddled. What is it man, small market vs. large market. Are you just gonna keep changing your opinion to suit the situation?
 
Parody = deliberate exaggeration for comic effect.
Parity = all teams pretty equal.
 
Not surprising. The NBA is a superstar driven league and there are only a handful of superstars in the league. Teams with those superstars are going to win those top spots and until the NBA stops giving superstars special treatment by the refs then it will stay that way.

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

I agree and the majority of those few super stars in the league only want to play in large markets with the exception of a Texas team.
 
We have lots of parody in the league. What we need is parity.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top