I would too. If the individual countries need to trade and all that they can and yes it sucks for land-locked states, but they aren't forced to stay Montana and Idaho, they can create the Montanaho if they want too.
It's fun isn't it. The more left leaning think small towns are failed hellholes, and the right think the huge urban areas are mostly hellholes.
dog eat dog!
I'd like to see how well the more rural areas would do without the support from the more wealthy urban areas that provide double the tax revenue per capita of the more rural areas. No more rural electrification such as the Tennessee Valley Authority provides and has provided. This means less power poles which means less cable and telephone. No more shipping problematic health care patients to urban hospitals with their increase capacity and increased capability. Taxes would go up0 dramatically for rural areas. Let the bellyaching begin in rural areas known as the country named Flyover.
You are correct that would be a big help.
Oh yeah, well I'll hit you with my drinking straw loaded with small peas.
Okay, i agree on the not pissing on his corpse part.
At first I thought Munchin was a hilarious name and then I stopped and thought wait a minute. So, I looked it up. It's Mnuchin.
Small towns are great but my medical needs surpass what small population areas can provide. Then there's the issue of my wife who loves concrete and neon, expensive stores, gas stations where she can pick and choose the lowest price, stores, stores, stores. She did love going to the beach to see my parents but I wonder if that wasn't because my mother took us out to eat at every restaurant in the Seaside thru Astoria region often. You'd be hard pressed to name a restaurant there that we haven't been to at least a dozen times.
"
Yes, it's always the R's who are bad and the D's who are good. I spelled exactly my problem with the Democrats here. If you chose to believe the democrats are blameless than go ahead.
Uncanny. That guy with the helmet flexing his muscles is the spitting image of me. It's just missing my morning star mace.
I didn't make a "both side's" arguments I said one side was doing something and looked bad, and the other side was doing something else and looked bad. All you've been able to manage is to tell me how only the Republicans look bad. The both sides argument is "both sides do the same thing", I didn't say that. I said one side is trying to push their political agenda (the republicans) though after hearing more about it it sounds like both sides had their own agenda's in there), and the other side was just shutting it down while not bringing their own bill to the table. I said they should make it two bills so they can fondle each other's agenda's together at some other time because people who need money immediately aren't getting it. So yours is also the strawman argument because you're arguing something I wasn't arguing.
