EL PRESIDENTE
Username Retired in Honor of Lanny.
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2010
- Messages
- 50,346
- Likes
- 22,532
- Points
- 113
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That wasn't my point. My point was why can't Democrats level the playing field. Must they perpetually be at a disadvantage?Lanny, like I mentioned in my post I dont like it when either party skips down to avoid a vote/the job they are paid and voted to do. Im all for the cause but not the bush league tactic, which is what I view it.
cheech and chong old man sign zee papers
You are correct, I wasnt clear, generally speaking of when they do it anywhere like the republicans have done by leaving down.Technically, unless you pay taxes in Texas, the current group aren't doing it on your tax dollar.
barfo
My favorite Pres said "if you want to change the law win the vote".That wasn't my point. My point was why can't Democrats level the playing field. Must they perpetually be at a disadvantage?
So, no evidence... gotcha. It probably should be deleted.
Hard to win the vote when voter suppression laws make it harder to vote, when gerrymandering gives Republicans built in advantage, when millions of people are kicked off voting lists without notification, when election oversight us being moved from independent commissions to partisan appointees, and when states including Georgia and Arizona have passed laws literally allowing state legislators to overturn elections.
Never have I disagreed with that. I'd just like to shine the light on the fact that these people have typically been denied the education that the rest of us have been blessed with. Okay, you've got this education so there should be no excuse for the rest of us fucking it up.
Still trying to push the narrative that Blacks and Latinos aren’t educated enough to have ID or know how to use the internet must create an inner struggle for liberals when they try to suggest it with a straight face while simultaneously using race relations as the keystone of their policies.
Now that it’s been admitted that the current administration is colluding with these companies to single out certain materials
Care to provide the source for this please?
Thanks!
So they are helping them track down and flag misinformation. How is that a problem?
If somebody is spreading provably false information we should do everything in our power to flag it...
Not doing this allows foreign powers to have an outsized influence on the will of the American people.
The problem is the very loose definition of “misinformation”. Look at how many things were called misinformation at the beginning of the pandemic that the media is now forced to accept as fact, or at least viable. They’ll just delete anything that might make them or their cronies look bad, that’s all it is.
I hope you realize today’s Democratic administration censoring information they don’t like is going to be tomorrow’s Republican administration doing the same thing.
The problem is the very loose definition of “misinformation”. Look at how many things were called misinformation at the beginning of the pandemic that the media is now forced to accept as fact, or at least viable. They’ll just delete anything that might make them or their cronies look bad, that’s all it is.
I hope you realize today’s Democratic administration censoring information they don’t like is going to be tomorrow’s Republican administration doing the same thing.
Looks like Vermont has it figured out. Oregon to a lesser degree...
They can't censor everything. Even at private companies people have certain freedoms of expression, yes even in the Army.There was a tiny bit of validity to the argument about tech companies being private companies and having the right to censor. This is if we pretend they aren’t monopolizing public discourse, that is.
Now that it’s been admitted that the current administration is colluding with these companies to single out certain materials, that argument is out the window. So now we have state run media, and even worse, state run public discourse.
It’s not surprising that an administration that talks to their citizens like children would think they have the authority to mitigate their speech as well.
Nothing can be censored without U.S. Supreme Court approval. They're touchy about censorship.The problem is the very loose definition of “misinformation”. Look at how many things were called misinformation at the beginning of the pandemic that the media is now forced to accept as fact, or at least viable. They’ll just delete anything that might make them or their cronies look bad, that’s all it is.
I hope you realize today’s Democratic administration censoring information they don’t like is going to be tomorrow’s Republican administration doing the same thing.