Courtside tonight

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Yeah I think he meant the trade exception and sounded confused when he wasn't getting the answer he was looking for. Oh well... poor Jay Allen.

I think you're right. I think Jay was talking about the MLE for this season. However, KP went on talking about next year's, I think. Then, Jay chose not to call him on it.
 
Re: Crap, MIXUM's Right!

you mean they didnt say surgery?
 
I like how the link goes "Oden travels with the blazers. not"
 
i wonder if that laughing image will change to a sad face after we lose 2 in a row?

should be fun watching frye cover yao and duncan..... but hey, kp didnt have any clue oden was hurt.


Your negatively doesn't bother me, but I want to understand something...

You are upset that KP didn't pull trigger on one of the deals that were rumored for a SF.

And you upset because, since we didn't make one of the rumored deals, we won't be able to guard Yao and Duncan.

Ok, got it. :biglaugh:
 
I think we can all safely assume that KP will not make any large deals during the season. What I am waiting for is to see what happens, if anything, this off season.

I was disappointed at the time that no deal was made, mostly because I am not sure if Portland really can afford to wait as long as KP wants to. It's as big a gamble as making a deal.

I just have to remind myself that 4 years ago Portland was completely unwatchable. Now the games are fun to watch and attend. Even if they don't win a title, this team will always be a favorite of mine, just like the Drexler teams were.
 
You really think KP is afraid to pull the trigger? He traded Zach for Frye and the rights to Rudy. He'll pull the trigger if he thinks he has a good deal . . . he has admitted taht he probably overvalues his player so the "good deal" is less likely to be there with tha attitude . . . but I don't think he is afraid to pull the trigger. (He just loves his hand picked team)

Just a minor clarification:
KP was going to trade Zach for Frye + cap space

At the last minute, Tom Penn pointed out that if we also sent Freddy Jones, we could get a trade exception which is what the Suns were looking for.

We have not realized any benefit to receiving said cap space, yet.
 
Just a minor clarification:
KP was going to trade Zach for Frye + cap space

At the last minute, Tom Penn pointed out that if we also sent Freddy Jones, we could get a trade exception which is what the Suns were looking for.

We have not realized any benefit to receiving said cap space, yet.


Didn't they use the TE plus cash to get Phx's first round pick (rudy) and James Jones?
 
We should fire KP and hire Steve Kerr. He's proven he can make trades in the middle of a season!

Hell, no. The Blazers should fire that crappy KP and hire Mixum! Then the team would not be stuck with such crappy ass players as Roy, Aldridge, Rodriguez, Fernandez, Oden, Bayless and Batum! They'd have Tyrus Thomas and Adam Morrison and would trade them for Vince Carter, who would be thrilled to be on such a great team!
 
i don't know if that's what he was referring to at the time but the blazers still have the full mid level exception to use on free agents this season. that means if they'd like to, they can offer more money than anyone except the cavs(who also have the entire mid level remaining) to players still out there as free agents or veterans who negotiate buyouts.

As a point of correction, if you're under the cap by more than the amount of the MLE you don't receive it.
 
Didn't they use the TE plus cash to get Phx's first round pick (rudy) and James Jones?

Yes, they said if we take James Jones and give us the TE, we could have the 1st rounder. Tom Penn's arrival paid immediate dividends.
 
Hey Mixum, do you want to make a bet that the Blazers make the playoffs? I'll give you two to one odds. If the Blazers miss the playoffs, I will pay you $40, if the Blazers make the playoffs you owe me $20. Let me know.
 
I asked about insurance and they didn't even mention it. I am wondering if the Blazers cost themselves getting insurance on Michael Ruffin since he hadn't played all year either. If so, that wouldn't be very smart since it was garbage time.

Pretty sure you get the insurance kicker if the player sits out 41 or more games (more than half the season). Since Ruffin has already passed that threshold, I think we're OK.

-Pop
 
i don't know if that's what he was referring to at the time but the blazers still have the full mid level exception to use on free agents this season. that means if they'd like to, they can offer more money than anyone except the cavs(who also have the entire mid level remaining) to players still out there as free agents or veterans who negotiate buyouts.

We actually only get the mid-level if we're over the cap, and we're not expected to be this offseason. Part of the reason why I still think it was a mistake to not trade RLEC when we had the chance. Essentially, we'll be about $6 million under the cap by letting his contract fall off the books, but we won't get the MLE. If we would have traded RLEC, we probably would have gotten the MLE, which will be around $5.8 million. That's a net gain of about $200,000. Not really that much of a difference.

On the other hand, actually being under the cap gives you the flexibility to make trades to bring back more salary than you send out. You can't do that with the MLE.

I guess I'll have to reserve my full judgment on not trading RLEC until this offseason. If KP makes a major move at that time, letting RLEC expire might look like a good move.

-Pop
 
As a point of correction, if you're under the cap by more than the amount of the MLE you don't receive it.

We actually only get the mid-level if we're over the cap, and we're not expected to be this offseason. Part of the reason why I still think it was a mistake to not trade RLEC when we had the chance. Essentially, we'll be about $6 million under the cap by letting his contract fall off the books, but we won't get the MLE. If we would have traded RLEC, we probably would have gotten the MLE, which will be around $5.8 million. That's a net gain of about $200,000. Not really that much of a difference.

On the other hand, actually being under the cap gives you the flexibility to make trades to bring back more salary than you send out. You can't do that with the MLE.

I guess I'll have to reserve my full judgment on not trading RLEC until this offseason. If KP makes a major move at that time, letting RLEC expire might look like a good move.

-Pop

If Rocketeer read the same article on ESPN I did then he isn't talking about this offseason, he's talking about right now. We never used the MLE this past offseason so we still have it to offer to fill a hole going down the stretch. Like if Joe Smith was to be bought out by the Thunder, we could offer him the full MLE to come and give us some depth up front.
 
Too bad you're not.

Your whole worn-out schtick is so dishonest and juvenile it's amazing anyone takes it seriously.

I think the only people who take him seriously are the moderators who find his schtick "cute".
 
As a point of correction, if you're under the cap by more than the amount of the MLE you don't receive it.

We actually only get the mid-level if we're over the cap, and we're not expected to be this offseason. Part of the reason why I still think it was a mistake to not trade RLEC when we had the chance. Essentially, we'll be about $6 million under the cap by letting his contract fall off the books, but we won't get the MLE. If we would have traded RLEC, we probably would have gotten the MLE, which will be around $5.8 million. That's a net gain of about $200,000. Not really that much of a difference.

On the other hand, actually being under the cap gives you the flexibility to make trades to bring back more salary than you send out. You can't do that with the MLE.

I guess I'll have to reserve my full judgment on not trading RLEC until this offseason. If KP makes a major move at that time, letting RLEC expire might look like a good move.

-Pop
jayps15 is correct. i was referring to this season.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/dailydime?page=dime-090223

Cleveland and Portland surprised us with their inactivity at the trade deadline, opting to hang on to the expiring deals of Wally Szczerbiak and Raef LaFrentz, respectively. But file this one away for future use -- each team still has its full midlevel exception available. That means the Cavs and Blazers can outbid any other team for free-agent talent waived between now and March 1, a group I outlined in Thursday's Per Diem.

While each team would have to pay luxury tax on the contract, effectively costing it double, it's peanuts compared to what it would have cost to trade its large expiring contract for a big-money player whose deal didn't expire until 2010 or later.

As a result, expect those two teams to be in the driver's seat for whatever talent comes available in the next nine days.

Boston, San Antonio and Houston also have chunks of their midlevel exceptions available; the Celtics have $2.4 million to spare and, despite their tax-paying position, are another team that appears able to spend freely for talent. San Antonio and Houston have smaller amounts available and each is precipitously close to the tax line, so they'll be a factor only for players with a decided interest in going to those cities ... or if there is no interest from the Cavs, Blazers and Celtics.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top