Politics Creepy Joe Biden is your Pedophile-President

[MarAzul]

When taking issue with one person's behavior, one must necessarily identify and decry all people who engage in something similar/worse?

Geez!
I would think people could understand. Trump has nothing to do with Uncle Joe invading the personal space of some females that object. I gather some don't, some do.
But the difference between the two doesn't have a thing to do with Trump.

 

[MarAzul]

Too bad, here I am and you can't get rid of me.

It tis a ...

 

[MarAzul]

Agreed

That would be narrow point of view.

 

[MarAzul]

Your defense of Trump is that he's a liar?

No.
I would explain it to you, But you would not get it, because you didn't. If you did you would not need me to explain it to you. So doing so would be pointless.

 

[Lanny]

When taking issue with one person's behavior, one must necessarily identify and decry all people who engage in something similar/worse?

Only when the other perp is far worse and never got a mention. Don't you think it's odd that say a newsman would mention a bank robber that got away with $500 and another bank robber who got away with a Million dollars never got a mention?
Why does Trump never get a mention yet Biden engages in a trivial lapse of judgement that is orders of magnitude less egregious than Trump's many assaults?

 

[PtldPlatypus]

Only when the other perp is far worse and never got a mention. Don't you think it's odd that say a newsman would mention a bank robber that got away with $500 and another bank robber who got away with a Million dollars never got a mention?
Why does Trump never get a mention yet Biden engages in a trivial lapse of judgement that is orders of magnitude less egregious than Trump's many assaults?

Are there any other public figures whom I must be certain to decry if I choose to criticize Biden, or is Trump the only one?

Just want to make sure to get the ground rules clarified here.

 

[Lanny]

Are there any other public figures whom I must be certain to decry if I choose to criticize Biden, or is Trump the only one?

Just want to make sure to get the ground rules clarified here.

Trump is the salient one. Trump is the one that gets defended yet his transgressions get ignored.

 

[PtldPlatypus]

Trump is the salient one. Trump is the one that gets defended yet his transgressions get ignored.

So is a history of Trump defense a prerequsite for mandatory mention? Or are all subject to this mandate, regardless of prior Trump-related posting history?

Furthermore, is this applicable to all criticism of public-figures engaging in creepy or assaultive behavior, or only relevant to critique of Biden?

 

[barfo]

No.
I would explain it to you, But you would not get it, because you didn't. If you did you would not need me to explain it to you. So doing so would be pointless.

Well, that works out fine for both of us then.

barfo

 

[MarAzul]

Well, that works out fine for both of us then.

barfo

That's good barf. We have to work with what we have.

 

[barfo]

That's good barf. We have to work with what we have.

A man's got to know his limitations.

barfo

 

[Lanny]

A man's got to know his limitations.

barfo

I like to think of mine as limitless.

 

[Lanny]

By the way, I'm really tired of duking it out with someone. Gotta take half the blame. The answer is spelled out by others - Just let it drop. Geez, what a feeling of relief.

 

[MarAzul]

Are there any other public figures whom I must be certain to decry if I choose to criticize Biden, or is Trump the only one?

Just want to make sure to get the ground rules clarified here.

Geez!
I hope this doesn't make it into the rule book some how!

 

[PtldPlatypus]

Geez!
I hope this doesn't make it into the rule book some how!

I'm just trying to avoid being called a hypocrite, and hoping to help others do the same.

 

[MarAzul]

I like to think of mine as limitless.

 

[MarAzul]

I'm just trying to avoid being called a hypocrite, and hoping to help others do the same.

Sigh!
I can tell. Good job!

 

[jonnyboy]

Too bad, here I am and you can't get rid of me.
The derangement is all yours.
I brought up Trump as a way of showing your hypocrisy. You disparage Biden and never a word about the true sexual predator, Trump. There's the hypocrisy.

Well you never brought up Mike Tyson, so you’re a hypocrite. He got in trouble for rape before.

 

[jonnyboy]

So is a history of Trump defense a prerequsite for mandatory mention? Or are all subject to this mandate, regardless of prior Trump-related posting history?

Furthermore, is this applicable to all criticism of public-figures engaging in creepy or assaultive behavior, or only relevant to critique of Biden?

I asked the same question and got no answer. Made too much sense. I think no matter what you have to bring up Trump or else you’re a hypocrite. In Lannyland anyway.

 

[Lanny]

Well you never brought up Mike Tyson, so you’re a hypocrite. He got in trouble for rape before.

The reason I didn't bring up Tyson was because he's not being defended like some people defend Trump.
Look, I don't want to go on and on wasting my time and yours.

 

[dviss1]

Well you never brought up Mike Tyson, so you’re a hypocrite. He got in trouble for rape before.

Riiiiiight.

Looks like the subject is those who haven't gotten in trouble.

And it's not a whataboutism to call y'all hypocrites.

You're defending a pussy grabber who supported Roy Moore...

Hyp-O-crites.

 

[MarAzul]

Aw hell! I will give it a shot, in spite of what I told @barfo .

Trump as a younger man, when we all began to hear of his deeds and exploits, was Media fodder. Often filling the pages with this and that. One story I recall was the humongous contract with Steve Young of the USFL. One of the all time great quarterbacks of the NFL.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidrae/2018/10/08/football-for-a-buck/#3a913222bb1f


Then there was the media splash of his divorces. All history now. He was never in the news because he was a good guy, he filled the pages because he was a flamboyant
business man of his time. He sold papers, and filled the airtime.

During this era, was the period you all are aghast about with the "Grab them by the Pussy!"

You all see decadence, but I see humor. You see decadence because it fits your need.
I see humor because I know what the was going down. I don't think you all want to know what that was about, but perhaps you just can't make the read.

It is pretty obvious to me that the reporter (name I don't remember) doing the interview on the bus (or what ever) with Trump (still the flamboyant business man) was
egging Trump on, attempting to live vicariously off Trump's exploits, attempting to get a spicy story. I don't remember the story so I don't remember it worked.
But here we go, years latter, Trump is running for President. Someone drags this shit out of the trash can to titillate the Democrats.
Holy hell it works, despicable! Oh my! On and on.

When I saw the story for the first time, I laughed! That's Trump being Trump, I can see doing the same thing. The guy wants more! To fill his vicarious fancy.
Well hell, why not give it to him? "You can even grab em by the pussy"!!

That man was not running for President. That man was and is an ESTP. We have had a few before as President, but none of you probably remember them.
Teddy Roosevelt, the first Progressive President.
Franklin Roosevelt, the God like Democrat President
Lyndon Johnson, Democrat and perhaps the grosses man to every have lived in the White house.

They don't live by intuition or always good judgement. They go for now and what is at hand. But never a dull moment.

 

[Chris Craig]

Are there any other public figures whom I must be certain to decry if I choose to criticize Biden, or is Trump the only one?

Just want to make sure to get the ground rules clarified here.

Sure was Bill was just as bad

 

[Chris Craig]

Aw hell! I will give it a shot, in spite of what I told @barfo .

Trump as a younger man, when we all began to hear of his deeds and exploits, was Media fodder. Often filling the pages with this and that. One story I recall was the humongous contract with Steve Young of the USFL. One of the all time great quarterbacks of the NFL.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidrae/2018/10/08/football-for-a-buck/#3a913222bb1f


Then there was the media splash of his divorces. All history now. He was never in the news because he was a good guy, he filled the pages because he was a flamboyant
business man of his time. He sold papers, and filled the airtime.

During this era, was the period you all are aghast about with the "Grab them by the Pussy!"

You all see decadence, but I see humor. You see decadence because it fits your need.
I see humor because I know what the was going down. I don't think you all want to know what that was about, but perhaps you just can't make the read.

It is pretty obvious to me that the reporter (name I don't remember) doing the interview on the bus (or what ever) with Trump (still the flamboyant business man) was
egging Trump on, attempting to live vicariously off Trump's exploits, attempting to get a spicy story. I don't remember the story so I don't remember it worked.
But here we go, years latter, Trump is running for President. Someone drags this shit out of the trash can to titillate the Democrats.
Holy hell it works, despicable! Oh my! On and on.

When I saw the story for the first time, I laughed! That's Trump being Trump, I can see doing the same thing. The guy wants more! To fill his vicarious fancy.
Well hell, why not give it to him? "You can even grab em by the pussy"!!

That man was not running for President. That man was and is an ESTP. We have had a few before as President, but none of you probably remember them.
Teddy Roosevelt, the first Progressive President.
Franklin Roosevelt, the God like Democrat President
Lyndon Johnson, Democrat and perhaps the grosses man to every have lived in the White house.

They don't live by intuition or always good judgement. They go for now and what is at hand. But never a dull moment.

You have a strange and disturbing perception of Trump, but I degress. You laugh at a man sexually assaulting women. You excuse his actions I call him a criminal. It is what it is. He has never been in the news as a good man because he is not one.

You weren't alive for Teddy. Perhaps Franklin. I agree with you about Johnson.

 

[Chris Craig]

Are there any other public figures whom I must be certain to decry if I choose to criticize Biden, or is Trump the only one?

Just want to make sure to get the ground rules clarified here.

By all means. Bill Clinton etc etc...whoever acts in such a manner should be criticized. To criticize one person who has committed and a t and to defend another who has done a comparable act is hypocritical

 

[jonnyboy]

Riiiiiight.

Looks like the subject is those who haven't gotten in trouble.

And it's not a whataboutism to call y'all hypocrites.

You're defending a pussy grabber who supported Roy Moore...

Hyp-O-crites.

That’s the thing though, I never defended him. That’s the whole argument I’m trying to make. I’m getting shit for calling Joe Biden creepy without saying trump is also. I’m actually getting called a hypocrite for not randomly including trump in my comment, even though he wasn’t part of the conversation. Trump had nothing to do with the original idea I was trying to present. People just jumped in and said “TRUMP IS TOOOOO!”
Ok fine.
Then if I don’t give you guys high fives and brownie points for trying to completely derail the conversation, then I’m a hypocrite.

You guys are fucking trippin.

 

[Chris Craig]

That’s the thing though, I never defended him. That’s the whole argument I’m trying to make. I’m getting shit for calling Joe Biden creepy without saying trump is also. I’m actually getting called a hypocrite for not randomly including trump in my comment, even though he wasn’t part of the conversation. You guys are fucking trippin.

Im talking about Maris and Mar. If you fucking listened. You stepped into the middle of it

That said do you excuse Trumps actions?

 

[jonnyboy]

Im talking about Maris and Mar. If you fucking listened. You stepped into the middle of it

That said do you excuse Trumps actions?

I quoted Dviss there, not you. You’re actually the one stepping in the middle right now.

And I’ve condemned plenty of Trump’s actions, publicly, and right here on this forum. Dig it up if you feel like it.

Call it petty, but I’m not going to give you the satisfaction of squeezing admissions out of me like a scolding authority figure. I’m not a child.

 

[Chris Craig]

I quoted Dviss there, not you. You’re actually the one stepping in the middle right now.

And I’ve condemned plenty of Trump’s actions, publicly, and right here on this forum. Dig it up if you feel like it.

Call it petty, but I’m not going to give you the satisfaction of squeezing admissions out of me like a scolding authority figure. I’m not a child.

Lol

Fair enough

 

[MarAzul]

You laugh at a man sexually assaulting women.

No Chris. He was clearly having the reporter on. You did not witness a sexually assault.
Although from hearing you guys retell it. You clearly believe you did.
Can't help you more though.