Politics Creepy Joe Biden is your Pedophile-President

[Orion Bailey]

@Hobbesarable and i were discussing just this while working on some bikes yesterday. i brought up what about forcing all candidates to donate to the government all the net profit from their campaigns? Anything not spent on the campaign goes back into the government And nOt in the politicians pockets?

just a thought but i think its worth exploring.

we have got to find a way to get money out of politics.

 

[ABM]

There has been virtually no fraud found in mail in voting.

No yet, anyway. To me, it's too critical to be subjected to this type of general process. I don't like it.

 

[Hoopguru]

Remember it, I lived through it.
I remember it like it was yesterday. It was a scant 183 years ago. Very similar to today except guns were shot using flint and so were fires built. Leeches were used for curing the sick as was blood letting. I mean, how more similar could it get?
By the way, weren't most of his followers in the deep South? I wonder how their descendants feel about Blacks today? Very fine people?

He formed the modern democratic party. My Granddaddy a staunch dem used to always call the democratic party, Andrews Jackson's party.
Which later on tune me off because I want a fan.

 

[Lanny]

No yet, anyway. To me, it's too critical to be subjected to this type of general process. I don't like it.

There were something like 30 fraudulent votes in one study out of over one Billion cast. Don't you think we have more important things to be concerned about?

 

[ABM]

There were something like 30 fraudulent votes in one study out of over one Billion cast. Don't you think we have more important things to be concerned about?

Of course, but that really has nothing to do with me not trusting mail-in voting. I think it would be a slippery slope - a path I hope the government chooses not to take.

 

[Lanny]

Of course, but that really has nothing to do with me not trusting mail-in voting. I think it would be a slippery slope - a path I hope the government chooses not to take.

It's pretty much a done deal.
Besides what's the benefit in voting twice? See, no motive.

 

[ABM]

It's pretty much a done deal.
Besides what's the benefit in voting twice? See, no motive.

Yeah, probably. I'm just old school.

 

[Lanny]

Yeah, probably. I'm just old school.

Republicans and especially those under he spell of the Trump cult have long known that a large voter turnout favors the Democrats and a mail in vote increases the voter turnout, hence the reason for opposing it. All this hullabaloo about voter fraud is strictly pulling the wool over the eyes of his followers.

 

[ABM]

Republicans and especially those under he spell of the Trump cult have long known that a large voter turnout favors the Democrats and a mail in vote increases the voter turnout,

Then it can be inferred that Democrats are inherently lazy/apathetic when it comes to voting?

 

[Hoopguru]

To me I don’t have a problem with mail in voting.
If there is fraud it can work both ways.
I just draw the line that US citizens should vote.
Growing up I Remember it was a big deal to go to the voting booth. I recall seniors being picked up and taken to a place to vote and it was cool to the effort they made.
Things have changed we live in a society where we like quick and easy, thus Amazon.
Hell let me vote over the internet and save a bunch work for the post office so they can keep my amazon packages coming quickly.
If a person cannot prove citizenship they shouldn’t be allowed to vote. I have several in laws that are here in green cards and they agree with that.
They are working towards citizenship and a few have already passed and they are so proud.

 

[wizenheimer]

Then it can be inferred that Democrats are inherently lazy/apathetic when it comes to voting?

not really

what can be inferred....and proven....is that large blocs of democratic voters face far more obstacles to voting than republican voters. What can be inferred...and proven....is that state governments controlled by R's closes polling sites in minority districts at an extremely high rate since the SCOTUS dealt themselves out of policing racism and disenfranchisement and election integrity in 2013

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...es-in-recent-years-rights-group-idUSKCN1VV09J

https://newrepublic.com/article/151966/gops-sneakiest-voter-suppression-tactic

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...tes-impact-minority-voter-turnout/1774221002/

the combined republican strategies of jerry-mandering; bullshit voter-ID laws; voting purges that target minorities; closing polling stations; and just about every other unjust tactic you can think of has been going on for a couple decades. And the motivations for it are not a secret. Various R's have admitted why they are doing the things they are doing over the years. And that includes trump who recently said if vote-by-mail was a big thing a "republican would never be elected again"

the campaign to disenfranchise and diminish and restrict the voting rights of democratic voting blocs are just an extension and 'enhancement of the Jim Crow laws. And a major reason why the R's have been hellbent on packing the courts with extreme judges. And the funny thing is that R's and conservatives and right wing mouth-pieces....and posters....have been silent about all of this injustice. They haven't cared because they knew if favored their side, just like the Russian trolling did in 2016.

and the cover for all this shit has been alleged significant "voting fraud" that doesn't exist. Totally phony concern about election integrity, than using it to undermine that very system

so when a conservative starts expressing concern about vote-by-mail, I have a real cynical view of what the motivation is. I'm not buying that it's about election integrity or about any principle other than 'hooray-for-my-side'....

 

[ABM]

not really


.....so when a conservative starts expressing concern about vote-by-mail, I have a real cynical view of what the motivation is. I'm not buying that it's about election integrity or about any principle other than 'hooray-for-my-side'....

Thanks for all your insights, but not here. I'm simply stating my opinion that voting in person has been with us through the ages and I don't necessarily trust the new concepts being presented. I like the fact that I have to apply for, and receive, a voting card and make my way to the polls and verifyably vote. Simple as that. No big political science endeavor nor otherwise concern for me intended.

 

[Minstrel]

and verifyably vote

Votes are more verifiable with mail-in ballots, especially compared to many in-person voting booths that tabulate things electronically.

 

[ABM]

Votes are more verifiable with mail-in ballots, especially compared to many in-person voting booths that tabulate things electronically.

Dunno, but nothing's stopping if now. The dems are grasping at straws with their less-than-preferable candidate. Whatever it takes to get him in office.

 

[riverman]

You put your signature on a mail in ballot and you get one ballot in Oregon....you drop it in a white box at city hall where I live...it works just fine...I voted that way when Trump won so it's not a conspiracy for Biden to get more votes....he's going to get more votes because of the track record of Trump...no opposing candidate has led an incumbent president from start to end like Biden over Trump since I believe the 1940s....he's going to get his ass kicked and it's not because of Joe...it's because of his own bullshit fake lying assed demeanor

 

[Minstrel]

Dunno, but nothing's stopping if now. The dems are grasping at straws with their less-than-preferable candidate. Whatever it takes to get him in office.

Biden's ahead by a pretty sizeable amount. While anything's possible, especially five and a half months out, there's no particular reason for Democrats to be desperate. Especially considering Biden's lead has been completely steady (unlike Hillary Clinton's) and Trump's approval has barely changed over the past three years. But you keep clinging to that narrative that Biden's way behind and needs a miracle.

 

[ABM]

Biden's ahead by a pretty sizeable amount. While anything's possible, especially five and a half months out, there's no particular reason for Democrats to be desperate. Especially considering Biden's lead has been completely steady (unlike Hillary Clinton's) and Trump's approval has barely changed over the past three years. But you keep clinging to that narrative that Biden's way behind and needs a miracle.

I know what happened in 2016. Stay tuned. Never underestimate the power and caginess of Trump.

 

[riverman]

I know what happened in 2016

don't stop there....I know what's happened since then! one of these events is a little more important than the other...Trumps not clever...he's a reality tv bullshit artist...his fans wanted a new soap opera to follow

 

[Minstrel]

I know what happened in 2016. Stay tuned. Never underestimate the power and caginess of Trump.

Trump didn't win in 2016 due to "power and caginess." He won because he had an opponent almost as disliked as he was. Biden isn't anywhere near as disliked and he's not doing much to make himself more disliked (or liked, but that's okay...a referendum purely on Trump means a win for the Democrats).

As I said, anything's possible with 5-6 months to go, but Trump's main problem is that nothing really moves the needle for him up or down and Biden's not doing anything to move that needle either. I don't think the race is over by any means, but Trump's in a pretty major hole.

 

[Lanny]

Then it can be inferred that Democrats are inherently lazy/apathetic when it comes to voting?

A lot of them are poor and have difficulty getting to the polls which has nothing to do with lazy or apathetic as you suggest. They have the further obstacle of having impediments in their way. An example of an impediment is having to travel many miles to register or farther and farther distances to vote.
Let's take me for example, it's difficult for me to get to my car and walk any distance. People who have manual labor jobs are very tired after work and just want to eat and sit down until bedtime and then it's another hard day at work. Some people feel sick unexpectedly and don't really want to leave the house. There are Millions of legitimate reasons for not wanting to go to a physical polling place.

 

[Lanny]

Trump didn't win in 2016 due to "power and caginess." He won because he had an opponent almost as disliked as he was. Biden isn't anywhere near as disliked and he's not doing much to make himself more disliked (or liked, but that's okay...a referendum purely on Trump means a win for the Democrats).

As I said, anything's possible with 5-6 months to go, but Trump's main problem is that nothing really moves the needle for him up or down and Biden's not doing anything to move that needle either. I don't think the race is over by any means, but Trump's in a pretty major hole.

Trump won because he had uncanny luck. Hillary had 3 Million more votes than Trump. You can't say that Hillary was just as unpopular as Trump. Sure Hillary had detractors but she had 3 Million less than Trump.

 

[ABM]

Trump didn't win in 2016 due to "power and caginess." He won because he had an opponent almost as disliked as he was. Biden isn't anywhere near as disliked and he's not doing much to make himself more disliked (or liked, but that's okay...a referendum purely on Trump means a win for the Democrats).

As I said, anything's possible with 5-6 months to go, but Trump's main problem is that nothing really moves the needle for him up or down and Biden's not doing anything to move that needle either. I don't think the race is over by any means, but Trump's in a pretty major hole.

Well, in the end, he won because he caught Hillary with her pantsuit down when he was vigorously campaigning in Wisconsin, Michigan, and other states while she sat on her laurels.

 

[jlprk]

She wears the pants in her family. She's a Syria-Libya-Arab Spring warmonger,while Bill delayed war in Yugoslavia for years.

 

[Minstrel]

Well, in the end, he won because he caught Hillary with her pantsuit down when he was vigorously campaigning in Wisconsin, Michigan, and other states while she sat on her laurels.

Sure, that was certainly an error she made (though, you got the mistake wrong--she wasn't "resting on her laurels," she was too focused on "expanding the map" and campaigning in purple states to try and turn them blue rather than locking down the states she absolutely had to have) but the base problem for her was that she was supremely unpopular as well. Had she even been net-zero in approval, she would have won easily. But her approval/disapproval was in the negative, nearly as much so as Trump. That's not the case with Biden.

So while I think Trump can still win the election, he's in a much worse position than he was in 2016. His only saving grace is being the incumbent, which tends to help a bit.

 

[ABM]

Sure, that was certainly an error she made (though, you got the mistake wrong--she wasn't "resting on her laurels," she was too focused on "expanding the map" and campaigning in purple states to try and turn them blue rather than locking down the states she absolutely had to have) but the base problem for her was that she was supremely unpopular as well. Had she even been net-zero in approval, she would have won easily. But her approval/disapproval was in the negative, nearly as much so as Trump. That's not the case with Biden.

So while I think Trump can still win the election, he's in a much worse position than he was in 2016. His only saving grace is being the incumbent, which tends to help a bit.

I truly understand your takes. That said, my feeling is that Joe Biden will, somehow, completely self-destruct by the time we get to the election. I'm still wondering why Obama doesn't continually come out and support him more...for the sake of the party. OK, so, I'm not wondering.

 

[ABM]

https://www.motherjones.com/2020-el...u-aint-black-crime-bill-factcheck-misleading/

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/mother-jones/

Biden’s “Breakfast Club” Comment About Black Voters Was Off. So Were These 5 Claims About the Crime Bill.

Presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden went viral in a bad way Friday morning, when, at the end of a radio interview with The Breakfast Club, he told host Charlamagne tha God that “you ain’t Black” if you “have a problem figuring out whether you’re for me or Trump.”

Progressive activists quickly slammed the former vice president for trying to act like an arbiter on Blackness, while the Trump campaign and the president’s supporters cynically seized the comment, even selling T-shirts featuring it. Later in the day, Biden apologized. “I’ve never, never, ever taken the African American community for granted,” he said on a call with members of the US Black Chambers Inc., an organization promoting Black-owned businesses. He added that he “shouldn’t have been such a wise guy.”

But that comment wasn’t the only problematic part of his appearance on The Breakfast Club. Biden also made several misleading or downright false statements about his role authoring the 1994 crime bill and the impact it had on mass incarceration. The much-derided law contained a host of measures to prevent crime—including “three strikes” mandatory life sentences, extra funding for policing and prisons, an assault weapons ban, and the Violence Against Women Act—and is often pointed to as a factor that fueled the disproportionate imprisonment of Black and brown people in the United States...........................

Here, we fact-check five of his claims to set the record straight.

1. “The crime bill didn’t increase mass incarceration. Other things increased mass incarceration.........

2. “I opposed that ‘three strikes and you’re out.'”.......

3. “I opposed…any mandatory sentences.”.....

4. “On balance the whole bill…it did in fact bring down violent crime.”.....

5. “The one thing I opposed in that bill was people wanting to give money to state prisons to build more prisons. I opposed it.”

 

[ABM]

https://www.libertynation.com/jim-crow-joe-a-new-moniker-to-make-biden-squirm/

The girls might have been booted off Fox News for disavowing the COVID-19 pandemic as a deep state “plandemic,” but they sure haven’t missed a beat in railing against the Democratic frontrunner former Vice President Joe Biden and the left in general. Riding the waves Joe made by telling black folks, “you ain’t black” if they voted for the current president of the United States, Diamond and Silk pounced like panthers.

They tweeted: “Jim Crow Joe wants to take us back to the days of slavery!” The tweet went wild, engaging black Americans with hashtags #JimCrowJoe and #YouAin’tBlackJoe. Folks of all colors, it seems, agreed with the girls.

Even Representative James Clyburn (D-SC) admitted he “cringed” when he heard the remark. The Biden camp went a bit on the defensive and began dialing for deliverance conferencing with the good people at the U.S. Black Chamber of Commerce. Biden’s remark was framed as being made with a “cavalier” attitude, but Symone Sanders, Biden’s campaign advisor, said the comment was made in “jest.” Then she promptly challenged: “Let’s be clear about what the VP was saying: He was making the distinction that he would put his record with the African American community up against Trump’s any day. Period.”

Sanders and Biden may want to rethink that double-dog-dare throwdown. His record includes that 1994 crime bill that led to mass incarcerations of blacks and the passing of an anti-busing legislation in the 1970s that would have desegregated schools. Oh, and can we forget the “fond” and “great” relationship with six of his congressional cronies who were avid segregationists? That list included Senator James O. Eastland. Joe, with a mist about his eyes, proclaimed that Eastland “never called me ‘boy,’ he always called me son.”

What are the Democrats thinking with this guy?

But He’s A Democrat – He Supports Black People, Right?

Liberty Nation’s Editor-in-Chief, Leesa K. Donner, offers a succinct and somewhat scathing review of Biden’s past problems with his segregationist-inspired past:...(CONTINUED)....

 

[MARIS61]

 

[Lanny]

I truly understand your takes. That said, my feeling is that Joe Biden will, somehow, completely self-destruct by the time we get to the election. I'm still wondering why Obama doesn't continually come out and support him more...for the sake of the party. OK, so, I'm not wondering.

Yeah sure, Biden is going to self destruct himself right into the White House and kick Trump out the back door never to be seen or heard from ever again. And Pizzagate will flourish. Actually, Pizzagate will soon die out proportionally to time as will QAnon.

 

[MARIS61]