Current roster a playoff team? (3 Viewers)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 4 (members: 0, guests: 4)
Natebishop3 said:
Which parts of his game is Iggy so much better than Batum?

lq5v.jpg


Batum:

Higher PPG
Higher win share
Higher block percentage
MUCH higher free throw percentage
Higher three point percentage
Higher offensive rating
Higher PER
Higher eFG%

And, oh yeah, he's five years younger than Iggy.
Click to expand...

Iggy's awesomeness is in the tape. It don't show up in the stats.
 
Imo the roster is good enough to be in NBA purgatory. 7-8 seed or just missing playoffs and no pick in loaded draft
 
Mediocre Man said:
You think i'm wrong?
Click to expand...

Yeah, you could say that.

Utah? Are you kidding me?

Lal with Kobe out half the year?

Denver while losing iggy, koufos, changing coaches and Gallo out for half the year?

These teams are equal to us at worst?

Are you serious?
 
Derick rick said:
How is LMA better than LEE?

look at the win share

Look at the TS%

Look at the EFG%

Look at the FG%

Lee has him beat.
Click to expand...

If you asked the 30 NBA GMs which player they would rather have, Aldridge would likely be selected by all 30. There's a reason when Lee went down, GS didn't miss him so much and when LA sat for the year we tanked.
 
maxiep said:
If you asked the 30 NBA GMs which player they would rather have, Aldridge would likely be selected by all 30. There's a reason when Lee went down, GS didn't miss him so much and when LA sat for the year we tanked.
Click to expand...

Well that and golden state, who has first hand knowledge of lee, wanted to trade lee and klay for Aldridge. Seems they believe Aldridge is much more valuable than lee as well
 
I'm not convinced the Spurs can put together a season like they just did. They caught lightning in a bottle, but are they really defying father time two years in a row? I find that highly doubtful.

OKC
Memphis
LAC
Houston

Those are the top four teams. I think the Blazers could easily be the 5th best team if a few things fall into place.
 
Natebishop3 said:
I'm not convinced the Spurs can put together a season like they just did. They caught lightning in a bottle, but are they really defying father time two years in a row? I find that highly doubtful.

OKC
Memphis
LAC
Houston

Those are the top four teams. I think the Blazers could easily be the 5th best team if a few things fall into place.
Click to expand...

I totally agree with you on the Spurs. I think this is the year they are around 6-8 seed, just like us.

Also like to add that I wouldn't put Memphis is the Thunder, Clippers, and Rockets category. They are alright but they are aging fast.

Tony Allen will be turning 32 in January, ZBo turns 32 this month, and Prince is old as dirt.

Gasol and Conley are in their respective primes however. I think they take a step back this year though as a team.
 
Pops doesn't really care about the regular season. He cares about keeping his guys healthy for the playoffs; he just wants to make it in regardless of the seed. The Spurs have shown they can win anywhere, so home court isn't as big a deal with that veteran core.
 
I will happily admit to being a Blazers Homer. That being said, we beat all 4 teams that made it to the conference finals. We did that with marginally third string players as our bench and basically no starting center. With those significant issues solved, there is reason to believe there will be substantial improvement to the team that was 33-36 pre-tank.
 
maxiep said:
Pops doesn't really care about the regular season. He cares about keeping his guys healthy for the playoffs. The Spurs have shown they can win anywhere, so home court isn't as big a deal with that veteran core.
Click to expand...

That isn't the issue. Health is the issue. If the Spurs stay healthy, they seem to always be in the mix..... but if Duncan isn't healthy, if Manu isn't healthy, or Parker, they are pretty much chum for the other playoff teams.
 
Natebishop3 said:
That isn't the issue. Health is the issue. If the Spurs stay healthy, they seem to always be in the mix..... but if Duncan isn't healthy, if Manu isn't healthy, or Parker, they are pretty much chum for the other playoff teams.
Click to expand...

Agreed. My point is that Pops doesn't care about playoff seeding like other coaches. If he has to ration Manu's or TD's minutes during the regular season and lose some games, it doesn't bother him. He just wants them 100% for the playoffs.
 
maxiep said:
Agreed. My point is that Pops doesn't care about playoff seeding like other coaches. If he has to ration Manu's or TD's minutes during the regular season and lose some games, it doesn't bother him. He just wants them 100% for the playoffs.
Click to expand...

At this point, I don't even know if rationing will make a huge difference. It's really a luck of the draw with guys as old as Duncan, Manu, and Parker.
 
Derick rick said:
Iggy's awesomeness is in the tape. It don't show up in the stats.
Click to expand...
Oh, gotcha. Your eye test says Iggy is better than Batum, despite the stats. Yet despite the fact that LaMarcus has twice the versatility of Lee, and is the much better defender, and is healthier and younger, the stats rule the eye test in this case? I don't think so. Lee plays a very specific role, and he does it very, very well. But he's not LaMarcus Aldridge. Lee is closer to the White Hickson.
 
BBert said:
Oh, gotcha. Your eye test says Iggy is better than Batum, despite the stats. Yet despite the fact that LaMarcus has twice the versatility of Lee, and is the much better defender, and is healthier and younger, the stats rule the eye test in this case? I don't think so. Lee plays a very specific role, and he does it very, very well. But he's not LaMarcus Aldridge. Lee is closer to the White Hickson.
Click to expand...

Lee also had the advantage of not being the focus of every defense in the league. Obviously it lightened a bit as Lillard got more attention, but Aldridge is doubled constantly and carries most of the scoring load.
 
Natebishop3 said:
Lee also had the advantage of not being the focus of every defense in the league. Obviously it lightened a bit as Lillard got more attention, but Aldridge is doubled constantly and carries most of the scoring load.
Click to expand...

BBert said:
Oh, gotcha. Your eye test says Iggy is better than Batum, despite the stats. Yet despite the fact that LaMarcus has twice the versatility of Lee, and is the much better defender, and is healthier and younger, the stats rule the eye test in this case? I don't think so. Lee plays a very specific role, and he does it very, very well. But he's not LaMarcus Aldridge. Lee is closer to the White Hickson.
Click to expand...

ha, so in iggy's case stats are the end all but in LMA's case the stats are not.
 
magnifier661 said:
Well u should reply to me then. I think it was about as real as any other rumors. Some top insiders talked about it.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
Click to expand...

I can't keep ya all straight.

so top insiders talked about it makes it true? dohkay.
 
Natebishop3 said:
Lee also had the advantage of not being the focus of every defense in the league. Obviously it lightened a bit as Lillard got more attention, but Aldridge is doubled constantly and carries most of the scoring load.
Click to expand...

Iggy was, too. Batum wasn't.
 
Derick rick said:
ha, so in iggy's case stats are the end all but in LMA's case the stats are not.
Click to expand...
Exactly!! :) (J/K)

I don't think stats are the "end all", at all. I think in both cases, it's OK to look at stats and also consider the specific circumstances under which the players are playing, and to use one's own evaluation, or 'eye test' if you will. If our eyes happen to disagree, that's cool.

IMO, Grandpa Iggy is still more effective and consistent overall than Batum. However, Batum is close, is younger, does some things better and others not as well, and for right now I'll take Batum on the Blazers rather than Iggy, thank you. Feel free to feel differently.

Re Aldridge/Lee: I already gave my take. Lee has the better FG% etc. but I think Aldridge is capable of the same if he were limited to playing closer to the basket, which he is not since his coach seems to prefer the "Dirk" offense. (Brian has written at length about the 'inefficient' shots Aldridge takes.) Again, I prefer Aldridge and his versatility for the Blazers at the moment.

:cheers:
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top