Dame all but demanding vet roster (2 Viewers)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
Natebishop3 said:
If you’re a free agent, why would you sign with Portland while Dame is out there saying who he’d like to play for?
Click to expand...

You mean who he'd like to play WITH? I think that speaks volumes, roll with Dame and its ride or die.
 
BlazerBender said:
but it IS what he said. But you are certainly entitled to interpret as you prefer. He has said it several times…

I have to say. The amount of attention assumed stress some are putting on themselves over this os simply over the top.
You are steadfast in your opinion. That doesn't make your opinion any more factual than mine.
Click to expand...

PCmor7 said:
Pretty stilted interpretation, but we've been through this before ad nauseum. For instance, he didn't say he didn't want another rookie. He said he didn't want a 19-year-old that was going to take 2-or-3 years to develop. And you nor I, by your own admission in our prior conversation, know what the other kind of conversation would be, the tone it would have, what he was looking for from it, etc. ... in other words, it's taking a massive, unsubstantiated leap to conclude he was going to ask to be traded from "we'll have to have another conversation."

Dame said that ... and a lot of other things and did a lot of other things that don't support your narrative and your contention. You just keep plowing down the same path with no regard to the information you don't like, though, because you don't possess the imagination to see anything other than through your specific lens.
Click to expand...

You're both misquoting him.

He didn't say "have a conversation."

He said, "give us what we need to have a true chance to compete for that. If that's something that isn't possible, or something that can't get done, then we got a different conversation to be had."

Not sure what more I can say if you think saying that they need to have a conversation is the same thing as saying "a different conversation (needs) to be had."

If I wasn't married and I wanted to propose to my wife, and we started talking about marriage. If I said to her, "I want to spend the rest of my life with you, but if that isn't possible, if that's something that can't get done, then we have a different conversation to be had." What would that imply?
 
Natebishop3 said:
You're both misquoting him.

He didn't say "have a conversation."

He said, "give us what we need to have a true chance to compete for that. If that's something that isn't possible, or something that can't get done, then we got a different conversation to be had."

Not sure what more I can say if you think saying that they need to have a conversation is the same thing as saying "a different conversation (needs) to be had."

If I wasn't married and I wanted to propose to my wife, and we started talking about marriage. If I said to her, "I want to spend the rest of my life with you, but if that isn't possible, if that's something that can't get done, then we have a different conversation to be had." What would that imply?
Click to expand...
Stoink all you can in the moment. Worry about the others things later.
 
wizenheimer said:
I know you don't. You'll focus on the Miami/Brooklyn stuff instead of "I believe I'll be a Blazer when the season starts"

I just don't think NBA front offices are that reactionary or spend much time spinning round & round based upon tweets and player interviews
Click to expand...

If that's the topic that's being discussed, then yes.... I'll focus on that topic.

I shared my thoughts about the interview after he posted it.

But if we're going to discuss what kind of impact the statements made about Brooklyn and Miami could have..... why wouldn't I focus on that portion of the interview instead of him saying that he'll be here when the season starts?

And I think that impression could change very quickly, because the way that I interpret his statement, that he expects to be here at the start of the season, is that he is confident we will make changes. Maybe he's confident that we will move the pick. I don't know. At the very least he seems like he's confident that he's going to get his way.

That could shift very quickly if we take Scoot and we say we're going to keep Scoot.

But the answers that he gave about which teams he would want to play for if a trade were to happen, and the fact that Haynes so adamantly said that Dame would not want to play for Boston, leads me to believe that Dame has thought what his next move would be if he were to ask out. That might not seem significant to you, but there is a good portion of people on here who say that Dame would NEVER leave. Never ever. Never in a million years.
 
Natebishop3 said:
You're both misquoting him.

He didn't say "have a conversation."

He said, "give us what we need to have a true chance to compete for that. If that's something that isn't possible, or something that can't get done, then we got a different conversation to be had."

Not sure what more I can say if you think saying that they need to have a conversation is the same thing as saying "a different conversation (needs) to be had."

If I wasn't married and I wanted to propose to my wife, and we started talking about marriage. If I said to her, "I want to spend the rest of my life with you, but if that isn't possible, if that's something that can't get done, then we have a different conversation to be had." What would that imply?
Click to expand...

You are overthinking it.
Nothing more to be discussed really. Its clear you only want to hear agreements to your opinion and are too quick to dismiss many many other things he has said and done that counter that opinion.
 
BlazerBender said:
You are overthinking it.
Nothing more to be discussed really. Its clear you only want to hear agreements to your opinion and are too quick to dismiss many many other things he has said and done that counter that opinion.
Click to expand...

I'm not overthinking it.

"We need to have a conversation"

"We need to have a different conversation."

Do you honestly think those two statements are the same thing?
 
BlazerBender said:
quick to dismiss many many other things he has said and done that counter that opinion.
Click to expand...

Such as? You and that other guy like to cite all these actions that Dame has done and dismiss actual quotes from Dame, but you never actually cite the actions or provide evidence. It's hilarious.
 
Natebishop3 said:
But if we're going to discuss what kind of impact the statements made about Brooklyn and Miami could have..... why wouldn't I focus on that portion of the interview instead of him saying that he'll be here when the season starts?
Click to expand...

because he said both things in the same interview. Furthermore, the next day, he clarified his remarks and reiterated, as well as emphasized, hie belief he'd be a Blazer next season

can't you see the difference? I mean really...he was just spit-ball-speculating about Miami and Brooklyn, that was obvious as hell, no nuance needed, but he was stating his belief and intentions about Portland. And he made a point, forcefully to emphasize his belief and his intentions a 2nd time. And that fits perfectly into his longstanding loyalty to Portland

but you are choosing to focus, hard, on the speculation, seemingly to the exclusion of the more important part of his comments

I'm sure you've noticed you're getting a lot of push-back right now. That's not because of your view on things. A lot of posters here share it. IMO, the push-back is because of how hard and how incessantly you are pushing the same narrow interpretation of events while not allowing Dame the room for some imperfect and in-artful comments that don't really convey his full range of thinking
 
Natebishop3 said:
Such as? You and that other guy like to cite all these actions that Dame has done and dismiss actual quotes from Dame, but you never actually cite the actions or provide evidence. It's hilarious.
Click to expand...

Whats hilarious is its been cited many times. I read them all and then decided to join in.
Are you intentionally trying to make this place insufferable with you pushing your opinion on everyone?
Maybe take a break? Does us all good at times because bro your over the top with your one sided view.
I really don't have much more to say on this. There is nothing i can say that will allow you to see another view, so….
Continue to pile up your opinion on everyone in every thread or understand its your opinion and others have a different opinion and move on. Your choice…
 
wizenheimer said:
because he said both things in the same interview. Furthermore, the next day, he clarified his remarks and reiterated, as well as emphasized, hie belief he'd be a Blazer next season

can't you see the difference? I mean really...he was just spit-ball-speculating about Miami and Brooklyn, that was obvious as hell, no nuance needed, but he was stating his belief and intentions about Portland. And he made a point, forcefully to emphasize his belief and his intentions a 2nd time. And that fits perfectly into his longstanding loyalty to Portland

but you are choosing to focus, hard, on the speculation, seemingly to the exclusion of the more important part of his comments

I'm sure you've noticed you're getting a lot of push-back right now. That's not because of your view on things. A lot of posters here share it. IMO, the push-back is because of how hard and how incessantly you are pushing the same narrow interpretation of events while not allowing Dame the room for some imperfect and in-artful comments that don't really convey his full range of thinking
Click to expand...
Dame also stated something to the effect that if those teams traded for him, they wouldn't guaranty anything because of what they had to give back in compensation. Basically , a grass isn't greener kind of thing.
 
Natebishop3 said:
I'm not overthinking it.

"We need to have a conversation"

"We need to have a different conversation."

Do you honestly think those two statements are the same thing?
Click to expand...

We need to have a conversation…how about “my god, why don’t you give it a rest?”

going on and on about it over and over ain’t going to do any good
 
I don't think anyone here is saying Dame will never ask/get traded. It certainly could happen as it happens to nearly every NBA player who is in the league for 10+ years. Personally, I'm pushing back against the hyperbole. Admittedly, I'm not big on the Stephen A Smith or Skip Bayless style like some here appear to be aspiring to the S2 version of.
 
wizenheimer said:
because he said both things in the same interview. Furthermore, the next day, he clarified his remarks and reiterated, as well as emphasized, hie belief he'd be a Blazer next season
Click to expand...

That's totally fine. I already acknowledged that. But as I said above, I think both statements can be interpreted on their own, and can indicate what could be going on inside Dame's head.

can't you see the difference? I mean really...he was just spit-ball-speculating about Miami and Brooklyn, that was obvious as hell, no nuance needed, but he was stating his belief and intentions about Portland. And he made a point, forcefully to emphasize his belief and his intentions a 2nd time. And that fits perfectly into his longstanding loyalty to Portland
Click to expand...

And that's why I said, I think the statement about him expecting to be here in the fall would indicate that he's confident we're going to acquiesce to his requests. But if the Blazers were to deviate from his expectations, that's when the second statement might come into play.

but you are choosing to focus, hard, on the speculation, seemingly to the exclusion of the more important part of his comments
Click to expand...

Because that's what we are talking about. I didn't "focus hard" on those statements when we were first discussing the interview. I'm "focusing hard" on the meaning of his statements about Brooklyn and Miami because that's what the group is talking about.

I'm sure you've noticed you're getting a lot of push-back right now. That's not because of your view on things. A lot of posters here share it. IMO, the push-back is because of how hard and how incessantly you are pushing the same narrow interpretation of events while not allowing Dame the room for some imperfect and in-artful comments that don't really convey his full range of thinking
Click to expand...

I got a lot of "push-back" when people didn't agree with me about LMA leaving too. And the funny thing is that there were people then, just as there are people now, who were ADAMENT that LMA would not leave. They were certain that LMA was going to re-sign. I'm not at all saying that Dame is LMA. Not even close, but the unwavering certainty and the abusive responses from some of the people on this forum are not new. I'm used to it. I have a handful of people on my ignore list because of it, and there are a couple people that are trending towards adding themselves to that list in this discussion (not you).
 
BlazerBender said:
Yes.
Has he defined what the conversation is?

no?

I rest my case. You continue to speculate. All good.
Click to expand...

No. He did define what the conversation was.

"We got an opportunity asset wise to build a team that can compete. That would be the number one thing, but if we can't do that, obviously like I said for months now, then there would be a separate conversation that we would have to have. We have to let things take their course."

"I'm not a fool. I'm not crazy. I love the organization that I play for, I love the city that I live in, and I'm going to give them every opportunity to give me... give us what we need to have a true chance to compete for that. If that's something that isn't possible, or something that can't get done, then we got a different conversation to be had."

Dame said that he believes the team has the assets to build a team that can compete. Those assets being the draft pick, maybe Simons, maybe Sharpe. I don't know what he thinks the assets are, but he clearly states that he thinks we have what it takes to go get pieces to compete right now. But if the team can't use those assets to build a team that can compete, a separate conversation would have to be had. What do you think that conversation would be?
 
BlazerBender said:
Whats hilarious is its been cited many times. I read them all and then decided to join in.
Are you intentionally trying to make this place insufferable with you pushing your opinion on everyone?
Maybe take a break? Does us all good at times because bro your over the top with your one sided view.
I really don't have much more to say on this. There is nothing i can say that will allow you to see another view, so….
Continue to pile up your opinion on everyone in every thread or understand its your opinion and others have a different opinion and move on. Your choice…
Click to expand...

First, I don't care if I'm bothering you. I don't care if I'm making this place insufferable for you. I come on here to share my opinions. If you don't like it, block me.

Second, if someone disagrees with me, I'm going to debate them. I don't know why some of you have to back out of the conversation and start talking about me, or your feelings. I really couldn't care less about your feelings. I come on here to talk basketball.

You have yet to really SAY anything to counter my view, just that I'm wrong. And when I ask you, or PC or anyone else to provide some hard evidence that proves me wrong, you whine about me and my posting style.
 
Natebishop3 said:
No. He did define what the conversation was.

"We got an opportunity asset wise to build a team that can compete. That would be the number one thing, but if we can't do that, obviously like I said for months now, then there would be a separate conversation that we would have to have. We have to let things take their course."

"I'm not a fool. I'm not crazy. I love the organization that I play for, I love the city that I live in, and I'm going to give them every opportunity to give me... give us what we need to have a true chance to compete for that. If that's something that isn't possible, or something that can't get done, then we got a different conversation to be had."

Dame said that he believes the team has the assets to build a team that can compete. Those assets being the draft pick, maybe Simons, maybe Sharpe. I don't know what he thinks the assets are, but he clearly states that he thinks we have what it takes to go get pieces to compete right now. But if the team can't use those assets to build a team that can compete, a separate conversation would have to be had. What do you think that conversation would be?
Click to expand...

For fucks sake.

You are right. You are the ONLY one who is correctly hearing what Dame means and only you know what he thinks. It makes you absolutely right and everyone else is a fool.

Satisfied now?

No?, what else will it take for you to not counter everyone else with a different opinion than yours?

Pages and pages of you in so many threads telling everyone else thier opinion is wrong and yours is right…

take a break man….

please?????
 
Natebishop3 said:
First, I don't care if I'm bothering you. I don't care if I'm making this place insufferable for you. I come on here to share my opinions. If you don't like it, block me.

Second, if someone disagrees with me, I'm going to debate them. I don't know why some of you have to back out of the conversation and start talking about me, or your feelings. I really couldn't care less about your feelings. I come on here to talk basketball.

You have yet to really SAY anything to counter my view, just that I'm wrong. And when I ask you, or PC or anyone else to provide some hard evidence that proves me wrong, you whine about me and my posting style.
Click to expand...

Whatever you say Nate…..you only read what you want. Thats clearer than anything Dame has said.
 
wizenheimer said:
you did catch the part where I compared him to Thybulle right? If it's 7th-11th in the rotation I'd be inclined to go with the player who plays better defense and doesn't have a history of shooting a higher rate of shots than Ant. And using Thybulle in the role preserves the MLE for another player. I think it would be a problem having both Thybulle and Brooks coming off the bench
Click to expand...
The point I guess is why not both?
Depth.
 
Natebishop3 said:
First, I don't care if I'm bothering you. I don't care if I'm making this place insufferable for you. I come on here to share my opinions. If you don't like it, block me.

Second, if someone disagrees with me, I'm going to debate them. I don't know why some of you have to back out of the conversation and start talking about me, or your feelings. I really couldn't care less about your feelings. I come on here to talk basketball.

You have yet to really SAY anything to counter my view, just that I'm wrong. And when I ask you, or PC or anyone else to provide some hard evidence that proves me wrong, you whine about me and my posting style.
Click to expand...

Uhh because you leave no room for a debate? Its your opinion or your wrong. Everyone is giving up on discussing this with you because you…

never mind. Ive given up too. Maybe one day you will see it. I know im blind to things at times…
 
tykendo said:
The Beatles sang "Let it Be". Time to just chill on all the rhetoric coming out of the Nat'l Media.
Click to expand...

"Don't Let Me Down" (Cronin trade song)

"Come Together!" (sure not the S2 theme song)

" All Things Must Pass" (for the trade-Dame crowd)

"Carry That Weight" (Dame's theme song in the Stotts/Olshey era)

"8 Days a Week" (how often arguments break out on S2)

" The Fool on a Hill" (olshey waiting for valet service)

" Got to Get You Into My Life" (Dame waiting for another all-star)

"Hello, Goodbye" (Joe Ingles career in Portland, Pau's too)

"I Me Mine" (CJ with the ball)

" I'm A Loser" (nice knowing ya Mr. Whiteside)

"Junk" (Nurkic shooting at the rim)

"Taxman" (kryptonite to the Vulcans)

"Things We said Today" (Dame interview)

"We Can Work It Out" (Dame vs Cronin)

"You Can't Do That" (trade Dame before July 10)
 
BlazerBender said:
For fucks sake.

You are right. You are the ONLY one who is correctly hearing what Dame means and only you know what he thinks. It makes you absolutely right and everyone else is a fool.

Satisfied now?

No?, what else will it take for you to not counter everyone else with a different opinion than yours?

Pages and pages of you in so many threads telling everyone else thier opinion is wrong and yours is right…

take a break man….

please?????
Click to expand...

He didn't mince words. I don't understand why you guys are fighting so hard on this. These aren't one of Dame's cryptic IG posts.

He sat down TWICE and said, for all intents and purposes, the same thing. Plain as day. Use your assets to put together a team that can compete, or we're going to have a different conversation. You're right, I'm hammering on this because I don't understand how anyone can see those clear fucking statements and think he meant anything else. Instead, you guys just say that I'm wrong and cite actions or words that disprove my "interpretation" and then don't post them. And then you get pissed when I ask you to post them.

I'm going to use the words directly from the source to counter people's opinions. If that seems repetitive, it's because people keep posting things that counter to what the man said himself. If you don't want those quotes thrown in your face, don't post things that would be counter to what Dame said. :dunno:
 
1. There are players Dame would’ve wanted to see on the team last year — Vanderbilt, OG
2. There are players — if Dame was traded — that he’d like to play with and therefore their current team IF said teams still could compete after a trade — Bam and Bridges.
3. There are players who have expressed to Dame that they’d like to play with him in Portland — Bridges, Brown are 2 — these have been said by those who have some inside access.

1. Dame wants to compete in the playoffs with a real chance.
2. Cronin wants to build around Dame.
3. Most all (19-year-old) rookies don’t help a team compete right away. Take that asset away and there are lesser assets to get the help they need, and that list of lesser trade assets is short.

In other words, draft and keep 3 likely leads to that other conversation … AND the team trades Dame by the trade deadline … which IMHO is waiting too long (due to risks) should they keep the 3. NateBishop3 and I may want very different pre-season outcomes, but maintaining the 2 timelines is IMHO the worst of 3 options — Unless Bridges, Siakam, Brown or OG comes for Simons, any filler, and future picks … well, that’s what options 1 and 2 are for.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Kid Canada
  • Locked
Roster next season
Replies
23
Views
3K
Mediocre Man
Mediocre Man
nirvs87
jason kidd not leavin yet
Replies
2
Views
727
typemilitant
typemilitant
Shapecity
Blazers Working Hard
Replies
2
Views
802
Mez
Mez
magicfrankie
Nets roster Pepsi Pro Summer League
Replies
6
Views
1K
throwback
throwback
NJNetz
Kidd headed to LA? Carter to Orlando?
Replies
15
Views
1K
NJNetz
NJNetz

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
Back
Top