LayneStaley
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2018
- Messages
- 6,567
- Likes
- 7,213
- Points
- 113
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree.I'm good with giving up two quality starters in grant and holiday, which is what it would take to match Giannis's salary. It's giving up multiple young players for a guy who's gonna make 60 mil a year when his teams haven't done anything the last few years.
Here is one.
Discount Tuesdays is where it's atLooks like I picked the wrong day and time to go see Superman with my dad, lol!
Really good movie...
BUT THIS IS FUCKING GREAT NEWS!
Welcome home, Daddy Dame!
Damn that is a spicy teamView attachment 74656
Maybe 2027 is the year.
That's what I think. And they'll make a trade for someone else next offseason for the run.View attachment 74656
Maybe 2027 is the year.
Insert *eyes welling with tears emoji*
I agree.
The post I responded to did not talk about having to give up multiple young players for a former MVP at age 30, they pushed back at giving up just 1 of our young players. Talk about over-valuing your own guys!
Good catch. He's signed for 2 more years, then he will be a restricted FA in 2027-28.Did we sign Murray for more years?
Correct imo, the only reason I could see him wanting a no trade clause is because new ownership coming in, most the time equals new GM and front office, thus not being loyal to Dame and potentially trading him down the road etc.I think the no-trade clause is irrelevant. They are not trading him again. This is about more than just basketball.
Ha, I saw it today too.Looks like I picked the wrong day and time to go see Superman with my dad, lol!
Really good movie...
BUT THIS IS FUCKING GREAT NEWS!
Welcome home, Daddy Dame!
Yeah the no trade clause is chef’s kiss honestly. The deal is dirt cheap already and all that’s left to decide is if Dame wants to play one more year beyond that. Simple and positively structured.Correct imo, the only reason I could see him wanting a no trade clause is because new ownership coming in, most the time equals new GM and front office, thus not be loyal to Dame and potentially trading him down the road etc.
the player option lets him opt out and resign for less money to give team cap flexibility to help us win more ringsYeah the no trade clause is chef’s kiss honestly. The deal is dirt cheap already and all that’s left to decide is if Dame wants to play one more year beyond that. Simple and positively structured.
I think it’s beautiful him and Cronin made amends for the bigger picture of the Blazers. It’s an epic love story and restores my faith a bit in the narrative here in relations to all of the bandwagoners trading Dame casted off.The NTC being part of the contract transfers if the player is traded.
I agree it’s meaningless, it simply means we couldn’t trade Dame anywhere he didn’t want to go. Agree we’re not trading him. I think he retires here now. I’m still shocked and elated, I didn’t think he was going to sign here.
How are the people that were hating on him for the way he left feeling about the way he came back?
That Gerald Wallace trade looks better every yearPortland traded Damian Lillard for Jrue Holiday, Toumani Camara, assets in 2023 - then Holiday to Boston for Robert Williams III, Malcolm Brogdon, assets (one led to Deni Avdija).
Now, Blazers have Lillard and Holiday, plus Avdija, Williams, Camara, a 2029 first, two MIL swaps.