Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ya it would be green, not seth as a filler.
i just want to get rid of our FAs for some value before they potentially walk this summer. that's why i keep throwing roco/nurk in these ideas.
Agree 100%.blazers new gm needs to go full daryl morey, risk everything to gain everything and morey was never afraid to pull the trigger
everybody and i mean everybody except dame should be available for trade and if that fails miserably, we go into full rebuild, simple as that
neither simons or little have potential to be franchise players, so i dont really understand some of you
this should have been done long time ago and i dont know if its neil olshey or ownership or both, but fuck them both just in case
I thought Chauncey was on his list?
I
Come, on IF you trade for Simmons there is no plan to do a blowup, its a retool around Dame. So one of Ant or Nassir can go. I'd prefer to keep Ant because of his better shooting and we would lose CJ who is a good shooter as well - Nas 3pt shooting remains more in doubt. However Ant will need to get paid next yr and Nas has one more cheap yr next yr,
I still think Morey will want Roco
Is the apostrophe wrong ? English is not my first language so i don't knowcan a mod please get rid of the apostrophe in the title of this thread? it's making my eye twitch
Chicago would get nothing. It would take a call and they'd be cool. Right now we're a hot mess and no one knows if 10 days will do shit for Dame. If we called Chicago and said they get to take the protections off of the pick they'd jump at it. GMs don't put the screws to each other just to be dicks very often, it gives them bad reputations. This would be us asking them to take higher potential value, so why would it take anything more than that?it'll be interesting to see what chicago will take to make those changes. but if nance was getting 25+ mins and a consistent role, I think his play would justify that move completely. i'm slightly annoyed by how patient chauncey has been with a completely unproductive roco.
I think if get Simmons, you would need to surround him with shooters. I would keep Simons instead of Little. Simmons and Little kind of fit in the same mold, kind of a redundancy.I’d keep Little. Fairly easily too. Higher ceiling and is size. 6’3” scoring guards are a dime a dozen
Simmons and Little kind of fit in the same mold, kind of a redundancy.
We do have the first round picks other than 2022 (protected tho). We don't have many 2nd rounders. You have it backwards.According to https://www.prosportstransactions.com/basketball/DraftTrades/Future/Blazers.htm
The Blazers do not own a First Round pick of their own until 2027
They have Chicago's first round pick in 2022 (top 14 protected).
After that, they have 2nd round picks in the following years:
2022: 0
2023: 5
2024: 1 (Maybe - Protected Top 55(?))
2025: 1
2026: 1
So putting together a package for Simmons will be that much harder.
you're misreading that website.According to https://www.prosportstransactions.com/basketball/DraftTrades/Future/Blazers.htm
The Blazers do not own a First Round pick of their own until 2027
They have Chicago's first round pick in 2022 (top 14 protected).
After that, they have 2nd round picks in the following years:
2022: 0
2023: 5
2024: 1 (Maybe - Protected Top 55(?))
2025: 1
2026: 1
So putting together a package for Simmons will be that much harder.
i dunno why but i keep waiting for another shoe to drop today. nothing is going to happen until DEC 15 at the earliest and Cronin prolly needs a while to settle in.