The big unanswered question is why Tom Penn was fired. If he was fired because there's something about the way Pritchard and Penn operate that they don't like, then the fans among us who appreciate Pritchard have every reason to be worried.
But the way Penn was dismissed - in a sudden firing, rather than giving him an opportunity to resign - says one of two things: a.) that Penn did/said something really bad and the Blazers needed to get rid of him ASAP, or b.) the management structure has sunk to a new low in lack of professional respect for the people who brought them to where they are.
There was a quote from Larry Miller in today's Oregonian that led me to believe that it could have been "a" above.
Exactly. Even the evil Vulcans, assuming they were mostly behind Penn getting the axe (which should not be assumed), aren't so insane as to just drop the hammer this way. They would have waited until the season was over. Something sudden had to happen. Something that they felt required immediate dismissal.
As far as all this hand wringing over KP being sent out of town on a rail, it has already got out of hand in Portland.
KP was a big part of a TEAM that made more good decisions than bad ones in rebuilding this team. But, people forget that Patterson was very involved in the group that made the essential key and dramatic revamp of the team - Telfair and the worst record in the NBA behind us netting the future of Aldridge and Roy.
The moves since then have been obvious (lucking into the no 1 pick and selecting the overwhelming consensus for that pick); good (Batum) and not so good (actually a long list).
I instantly celebrated what the team did in that magic draft as something special. Since then, I have often been less than thrilled - questioning the moves of the team or confused by them: Extending Webster before his did jack in this league; The Miles fiasco; hyping the Golden Ticket; trading Zach for so little; the Roy extension drama; the LaMarcus extension overpaying; non revamping the medical/training staff/team; concerned about the gulf between the players the GM brings in Vs. the style the coach imposes; the attempt to grossly overpay Hedo.
I am not suggesting KP is a bad GM, but I am not so sure he is great. Maybe parts of the coaching or management team get in the way of his brilliance. Not sure. If so, he needs to do a better sales job to get approval for his brilliant ideas. If like the gulf between Nate and KP, there is a gulf with upper management, it may be at the root of the problem.
It would be better to have ownership, upper management, GM and coach all being more closely aligned in philosophy - even if that GM was of average quality, than to have a brilliant GM who is in constant tension and opposition with all other groups.
Or put another way, if KP goes - even if you think he is "brilliant" - it may be for the best if there can be no more alignment with the rest of the decision makers.