Politics Deal Coming Soon- Special Counsel Investigation Prediction Thread

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

But no comment again. One year now and not much comment on anything.

Do you think they should be commenting on an ongoing investigation?

How long does this thing run?

Until it is completed.

If Trump is defeated, does it end?

No.

If Trump wins reelection, does he (the special counsel) continue.

Yes.

Does it continue into the term of the next President?

If necessary.

To what purpose?

Truth, Justice, and the American Way.

barfo
 
If convicted, absolutely.

barfo

They really ought to just put her on perpetual trial. Most everything she does is worth investigating. If they ever get her under oath, look out (she'll be caught lying).
 
They really ought to just put her on perpetual trial. Most everything she does is worth investigating. If they ever get her under oath, look out (she'll be caught lying).

Don't be so timid, Denny. Perpetual trial is too good for the likes of her. Why not send her to Gitmo and waterboard her until she gives up her secrets. Then continue the torture until she's dead. Kill the rest of her family, burn her houses. Create a national holiday to celebrate her death.

barfo
 
Don't be so timid, Denny. Perpetual trial is too good for the likes of her. Why not send her to Gitmo and waterboard her until she gives up her secrets. Then continue the torture until she's dead. Kill the rest of her family, burn her houses. Create a national holiday to celebrate her death.

barfo

Who’s the rest of her family? Does Chelsea have kids? I mean, beside that part I guess, the rest seems kinda cool actually.
 
Don't be so timid, Denny. Perpetual trial is too good for the likes of her. Why not send her to Gitmo and waterboard her until she gives up her secrets. Then continue the torture until she's dead. Kill the rest of her family, burn her houses. Create a national holiday to celebrate her death.

barfo

How about a FAIR trial first?

What we're seeing is those in charge of her investigations watered down the charges so she wouldn't get one, she wasn't put under oath, she was allowed to destroy evidence (that's obstruction by definition), and otherwise people afraid she'd get her revenge after her inevitable 2016 election.
 
They really ought to just put her on perpetual trial. Most everything she does is worth investigating. If they ever get her under oath, look out (she'll be caught lying).

She answered questions under oath for about 12 hours one time. Did you not know that? Oh, guess what evil she has done that they discovered. Yep, abosolutely nothing.
 
How about a FAIR trial first?

What we're seeing is those in charge of her investigations watered down the charges so she wouldn't get one, she wasn't put under oath, she was allowed to destroy evidence (that's obstruction by definition), and otherwise people afraid she'd get her revenge after her inevitable 2016 election.

You're always under oath when you testify before Congress.

Fair? Is Trey Gowdy trusted enough to conduct a fair inquisitioning, especially one lasting 12 hours?
 
You're always under oath when you testify before Congress.

Fair? Is Trey Gowdy trusted enough to conduct a fair inquisitioning, especially one lasting 12 hours?

Yes, Gowdy is trusted enough.

Oops!

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/15/house-gop-lays-out-perjury-case-hillary-clinton/

GOP pushes Clinton perjury charges

Two top House Republicans say Hillary Clinton appears to have lied to Congress, laying out a case Monday that they said could sustain perjury charges against the Democratic presidential nominee for failing to give an honest accounting of her use of a secret email server while she was secretary of state.

Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte of Virginia and Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz of Utah said evidence the FBI collected during its investigation of Mrs. Clinton’s email practices contradicts what she herself told Congress in testimony last year.

...

Mr. Goodlatte and Mr. Chaffetz said FBI Director James B. Comey’s depiction of what he called Mrs. Clinton’s “extremely careless” email practices pokes holes in a number of statements Mrs. Clinton gave to Congress during her 2015 testimony to the House committee investigating the Benghazi terrorist attack.

Mrs. Clinton testified at that time that she never sent or received information marked classified, but Mr. Comey told Congress last month that three such documents were in fact marked at the time she handled them via email.

Mrs. Clinton also testified that when she belatedly agreed to comply with open-records laws and return her work-related emails to the government, she had her attorneys go “through every single email.” But Mr. Comey said Mrs. Clinton’s attorneys used only search terms and subject lines to decide which emails to return and did not read each one.

The FBI director said his investigators discovered thousands of work-related messages Mrs. Clinton failed to turn over to the State Department, raising questions about yet another statement in Mrs. Clinton’s testimony last year. Mr. Comey also said Mrs. Clinton had multiple servers during her time using the secret account.

“Although there may be other aspects of Secretary Clinton’s sworn testimony that are at odds with the FBI’s findings, her testimony in those four areas bears specific scrutiny in light of the facts and evidence FBI Director James Comeydescribed,” the chairmen said in a letter Monday referring the case to U.S. Attorney Channing D. Phillips, the chief federal prosecutor for the District of Columbia.
 
Yes, Gowdy is trusted enough.

Oops!

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/15/house-gop-lays-out-perjury-case-hillary-clinton/

GOP pushes Clinton perjury charges

Two top House Republicans say Hillary Clinton appears to have lied to Congress, laying out a case Monday that they said could sustain perjury charges against the Democratic presidential nominee for failing to give an honest accounting of her use of a secret email server while she was secretary of state.

Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte of Virginia and Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz of Utah said evidence the FBI collected during its investigation of Mrs. Clinton’s email practices contradicts what she herself told Congress in testimony last year.

...

Mr. Goodlatte and Mr. Chaffetz said FBI Director James B. Comey’s depiction of what he called Mrs. Clinton’s “extremely careless” email practices pokes holes in a number of statements Mrs. Clinton gave to Congress during her 2015 testimony to the House committee investigating the Benghazi terrorist attack.

Mrs. Clinton testified at that time that she never sent or received information marked classified, but Mr. Comey told Congress last month that three such documents were in fact marked at the time she handled them via email.

Mrs. Clinton also testified that when she belatedly agreed to comply with open-records laws and return her work-related emails to the government, she had her attorneys go “through every single email.” But Mr. Comey said Mrs. Clinton’s attorneys used only search terms and subject lines to decide which emails to return and did not read each one.

The FBI director said his investigators discovered thousands of work-related messages Mrs. Clinton failed to turn over to the State Department, raising questions about yet another statement in Mrs. Clinton’s testimony last year. Mr. Comey also said Mrs. Clinton had multiple servers during her time using the secret account.

“Although there may be other aspects of Secretary Clinton’s sworn testimony that are at odds with the FBI’s findings, her testimony in those four areas bears specific scrutiny in light of the facts and evidence FBI Director James Comeydescribed,” the chairmen said in a letter Monday referring the case to U.S. Attorney Channing D. Phillips, the chief federal prosecutor for the District of Columbia.

Things are getting "Stormy" for Trump. :beatinto:
 
Yes, Gowdy is trusted enough.

Oops!

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/15/house-gop-lays-out-perjury-case-hillary-clinton/

GOP pushes Clinton perjury charges

Two top House Republicans say Hillary Clinton appears to have lied to Congress, laying out a case Monday that they said could sustain perjury charges against the Democratic presidential nominee for failing to give an honest accounting of her use of a secret email server while she was secretary of state.

Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte of Virginia and Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz of Utah said evidence the FBI collected during its investigation of Mrs. Clinton’s email practices contradicts what she herself told Congress in testimony last year.

...

Mr. Goodlatte and Mr. Chaffetz said FBI Director James B. Comey’s depiction of what he called Mrs. Clinton’s “extremely careless” email practices pokes holes in a number of statements Mrs. Clinton gave to Congress during her 2015 testimony to the House committee investigating the Benghazi terrorist attack.

Mrs. Clinton testified at that time that she never sent or received information marked classified, but Mr. Comey told Congress last month that three such documents were in fact marked at the time she handled them via email.

Mrs. Clinton also testified that when she belatedly agreed to comply with open-records laws and return her work-related emails to the government, she had her attorneys go “through every single email.” But Mr. Comey said Mrs. Clinton’s attorneys used only search terms and subject lines to decide which emails to return and did not read each one.

The FBI director said his investigators discovered thousands of work-related messages Mrs. Clinton failed to turn over to the State Department, raising questions about yet another statement in Mrs. Clinton’s testimony last year. Mr. Comey also said Mrs. Clinton had multiple servers during her time using the secret account.

“Although there may be other aspects of Secretary Clinton’s sworn testimony that are at odds with the FBI’s findings, her testimony in those four areas bears specific scrutiny in light of the facts and evidence FBI Director James Comeydescribed,” the chairmen said in a letter Monday referring the case to U.S. Attorney Channing D. Phillips, the chief federal prosecutor for the District of Columbia.

So, what is the committee's final decision on her testimony? Did she lie? Remember, it's not sufficient to say that because someone told an untruth that he liied. That would mean Trump lied about Mexico paying for the wall. No, it's got to be an intentional untruth.

Anyhow, does this mean the Hillary will be indicted any day now?

Also, I 've seen some of those e-mails and the classification was not clearly marked. All the classified information I was privy to in the Army was clearly identified.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top