Dear Joe,
Jason Quick claimed
in his recent article on The Athletic that, "Lillard is part of the three-headed braintrust that makes the top basketball-related decisions for the Blazers, and Cronin and Billups on Sunday were aligned with the thinking of their franchise player."
Is this true? If so, why? When has a first-time GM, first-time coach, and ESPECIALLY a player been able to put together a team that can compete? If so, when did Dame ascend to that role? Did it correspond with the Blazers' inability to make the playoffs?
This team is no closer to winning now than it was when you took over, and you have spent big money on retaining Nurk, Simons, and Dame. You have given up future assets to get a guy that Dame thought would be a difference maker. Billups claims that, “We’ve done the tweak thing. A few times. We’ve got to be more aggressive than that. If we want to actually do right by the best player in the history of the organization, we have to be aggressive.” Why is "doing right" by Dame a priority for the organization when it hasn't, to date, resulted in teams that can even finish the season without tanking to escape mediocrity?
What has to happen for the team to finally stop grasping at straws, giving up future picks, and re-signing our own free agents? How many years do we have to suck? Is two enough? Three? Five? Until Dame retires? Until you get fired?
This was an uninspired season filled with injuries and very few promising things moving forward. Dame was awesome but the only other bright spots were (a) the addition of Sharpe, and (b) the potential of adding another quality lottery pick... but now Dame is saying he's, "I’m just not interested in that [drafting another young player]. That’s not a secret." Why should the Blazers fans be interested in a franchise that would be content with doing more of the same when it's so painfully obvious it will end with the same sad results?
Ed O.