Bogus! Democrat Debate LA.

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
Hoopguru said:
I though Biden & Amy did tad better than the others tonight. God help us if Sanders gets the nomination.
I think Joe and Amy are the most likely to beat Trump of course I could be wrong?

I agree that Joe was solid tonight and didn’t hurt himself.
I’m glad Yang is there as he does bring some good analysis and isn’t eager to jump on anyone’s bandwagon. We need mire thinking like his in Government.
EW I still cannot embrace her nervous flighty only one way approach. She needs to relax a bit and have a message for independents and moderate conservatives to buy into. She doesn’t seem interested like Bernie doesn’t.
Pete and Amy at least want to make room for the independents and mods that would entertain crossing the bridge.
Amy was good and she is zeroing In on her mid west Segment and liked her comment about building a bridge for those republicans moderates.
I think Joe & Amy would have the best shot at beating trump. Just my independent moderate been both dem and repub in the past, undecided opinion.
.
Click to expand...
No, I think you're right about Biden and Klobuchar beating Trump although my favorite is still Mayor Pete.
My least favorite is Tulsi but even she would be a significant improvement on Trump.
 
Lanny said:
No, I think you're right about Biden and Klobuchar beating Trump although my favorite is still Mayor Pete.
My least favorite is Tulsi but even she would be a significant improvement on Trump.
Click to expand...
I like Pete too and I think he appeals to a wide segment. Iowa is proof, another mid western don't fly over us again dude.
 
Hoopguru said:
I like Pete too and I think he appeals to a wide segment. Iowa is proof, another mid western don't fly over us again dude.
Click to expand...
Everyplace deserves attention.
 
Lanny said:
No, I think you're right about Biden and Klobuchar beating Trump although my favorite is still Mayor Pete.
My least favorite is Tulsi but even she would be a significant improvement on Trump.
Click to expand...
Any gal that can surf, win a council position at 21, fly helicopters, and is not afraid to challenge both parties National Committees and bs, cant be all that bad. Ive always liked wild women!
 
I really like Yangs approach to problem solving, failure analysis and trouble shooting with what's wrong with our Country and how to improve for the 21st century.
 
Hoopguru said:
I really like Yangs approach to problem solving, failure analysis and trouble shooting with what's wrong with our Country and how to improve for the 21st century.
Click to expand...
Basic problem solving was taught to us engineers. It came in handy.
 
Hoopguru said:
Any gal that can surf, win a council position at 21, fly helicopters, and is not afraid to challenge both parties National Committees and bs, cant be all that bad. Ive always liked wild women!
Click to expand...
That's cool but I have to wonder if being a woman isn't a liability when running against Trump.
 
Lanny said:
Basic problem solving was taught to us engineers. It came in handy.
Click to expand...
I'm a big believer in failure analysis and trouble shooting problems. Since I'm a methodical fellow I use an easy likely approach initially, then go from there.
 
Lanny said:
That's cool but I have to wonder if being a woman isn't a liability when running against Trump.
Click to expand...
I could be and I think it would be with EW running. But I think AK would be very effective and scornful which Im think would go over well.
 
In business, it's a cardinal sin to bad talk your competition as it leaves a bad taste and comes across negative. And you never know if you will end up working for your competitor.
One of the problems I have with Warren is she try's to hard to find something that will make her look good and embellishes certain events to impress her audience. Some of her past professed past accomplishments/personal facts have been challenged. Much like the guy in the WH does now. If she would relax a bit and focus on policy that would appeal to moderates/independents, she would be way ahead in the polling. Thats just my take!
 
Hoopguru said:
I'm a big believer in failure analysis and trouble shooting problems. Since I'm a methodical fellow I use an easy likely approach initially, then go from there.
Click to expand...
We learn the most from our mistakes. Well, that's assuming an open mind.
 
DNC Eases Debate Requirements To 0.1% Above Whatever Cory Booker Polling

12/19/19 6:00PM
View attachment upload_2019-12-30_19-12-51.gif
WASHINGTON—In response to the presidential candidate’s criticism of the party’s current rules that have left him unqualified for tonight’s Democratic debate, the DNC announced Thursday that they have eased the debate requirements to 0.1% above whatever number Cory Booker was polling. “We’ve considered Senator Booker’s comments and have agreed to change the overly stringent prerequisites to include those candidates who poll just a fraction of a percentage above him,” said DNC chairman Tom Perez, adding that these less strict qualifications would be tied to a constantly sliding scale contingent on how Senator Booker’s campaign was doing at any point during the race, opening up the debate stage to a more inclusive group of Democrats who had low polling numbers that were still higher than Booker’s. “We’ve also taken the extra step of adjusting the number of necessary donations from 200,000 unique donors to whatever number makes Booker come up just shy of qualifying. We want to thank Senator Booker for pointing out this injustice after he learned that he would not be eligible for the upcoming debate, and we hope that this compromise satisfies Senator Booker’s request.” Perez added that the threshold may be relaxed even more to allow any Democratic candidate still in the race onto the debate stage after Cory Booker drops out.

https://politics.theonion.com/dnc-eases-debate-requirements-to-0-1-above-whatever-co-1840541740
 

Attachments

MARIS61 said:
DNC Eases Debate Requirements To 0.1% Above Whatever Cory Booker Polling

12/19/19 6:00PM
View attachment 29229
WASHINGTON—In response to the presidential candidate’s criticism of the party’s current rules that have left him unqualified for tonight’s Democratic debate, the DNC announced Thursday that they have eased the debate requirements to 0.1% above whatever number Cory Booker was polling. “We’ve considered Senator Booker’s comments and have agreed to change the overly stringent prerequisites to include those candidates who poll just a fraction of a percentage above him,” said DNC chairman Tom Perez, adding that these less strict qualifications would be tied to a constantly sliding scale contingent on how Senator Booker’s campaign was doing at any point during the race, opening up the debate stage to a more inclusive group of Democrats who had low polling numbers that were still higher than Booker’s. “We’ve also taken the extra step of adjusting the number of necessary donations from 200,000 unique donors to whatever number makes Booker come up just shy of qualifying. We want to thank Senator Booker for pointing out this injustice after he learned that he would not be eligible for the upcoming debate, and we hope that this compromise satisfies Senator Booker’s request.” Perez added that the threshold may be relaxed even more to allow any Democratic candidate still in the race onto the debate stage after Cory Booker drops out.

https://politics.theonion.com/dnc-eases-debate-requirements-to-0-1-above-whatever-co-1840541740
Click to expand...

Nobody better tell Maris what The Onion is.
 
MARIS61 said:
I am well aware what the Onion is.

They produce hilarious exaggerations of ridiculous magnitude, much like MSNBC, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC...
Click to expand...

dosfg2mp2v741.jpg
 
MARIS61 said:
I am well aware what the Onion is.

They produce hilarious exaggerations of ridiculous magnitude, much like MSNBC, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC...
Click to expand...
You misspelled Breitbart and Fox News.
 
barfo said:
Ok, I watched that to see what you were on about. Is your position that the power grid cannot be attacked?

barfo
Click to expand...
My position is that Maddow is a fear mongering, red baiting propagandist. Bizzaro Hannity if you will.
 
bodyman5000 and 1 said:
My position is that Maddow is a fear mongering, red baiting propagandist. Bizzaro Hannity if you will.
Click to expand...

I won't. But I guess if the lights go out sometime down the road you won't be on line, so Maddow won't be able to tell you she told you so.

Would you have been more receptive if she said Ukraine could attack the power grid, instead of Russia or China? I hear they have the server, you know, Crowdstrike.

barfo
 
barfo said:
I won't. But I guess if the lights go out sometime down the road you won't be on line, so Maddow won't be able to tell you she told you so.

Would you have been more receptive if she said Ukraine could attack the power grid, instead of Russia or China? I hear they have the server, you know, Crowdstrike.

barfo
Click to expand...
Your posts are garbage.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Why I Vote Democrat
Replies
26
Views
2K
maxiep
maxiep
Denny Crane
Rand Paul won’t shake Jack Conway’s hand after 'Aqua Buddha' debate
Replies
7
Views
656
Natebishop3
Natebishop3
MarAzul
Politics Are you a Republican or Democrat? How do you know?
Replies
10
Views
356
dviss1
dviss1
Rastapopoulos
Politics WV Governor to switch from Democrat to Republican
2 3
Replies
72
Views
4K
Denny Crane
Denny Crane
Chris Craig
OT Democrat Conor Lamb Wins in Pennslyvania
Replies
27
Views
869
Lanny
Lanny

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top