Politics Democratic Socialism

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Users who are viewing this thread

What's been proposed before has only been a .25 of 1%. Yes a fourth of a percent.

http://p2pfoundation.net/Securities_Turnover_Excise_Tax

For us, this Securities Turnover Excise Tax (STET) was a revenue source. For example, if we were to instate a .25 percent STET (tax) on everystock, swap, derivative, or other trade today, it would produce – in its firstyear – around $150 billion in revenue. Wall Street would be generatingthe money to fund its own bailout. (For comparison, as best I candetermine, the UK’s STET is .25 percent, and Taiwan just dropped theirs from.60 to .30 percent.)
It's not really 1.4 of a percent for the grand scheme. An annual 19% is 1.9% per month. $0.25 per transaction would generate tremendous amounts of revenue with the amount of daily trades.
 
WTF does that mean? That he was good a pandering? GTFO. We don't and haven't liked him. Trust. Are you gonna take a selfie with the President? Hell yeah. Bush or not.

No, he wasn't pandering.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politic...-legacy-on-africa-wins-praise-even-from-foes/

George W. Bush's Legacy on Africa Wins Praise, Even From Foes

At more than $5 billion a year in humanitarian aid to Africa, President Bush has given more assistance to the continent than any other president. His administration's aid was largely targeted to fight the major global health issues facing the continent, HIV/AIDS and malaria.

In 2003 Bush founded the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), which guaranteed $15 million to be spent over the course of five years on prevention, treatment and research on HIV/AIDS. Under the Bush administration, the U.S. was also a leader in contributing to the Global Fund on AIDS.

Though there was controversy over some of the qualifications for PEPFAR funds -up to 20% was to be spent on abstinence-focused prevention programs, and the funds could not be used for needle-sharing programs - most HIV/AIDS activists credit the program for being instrumental in turning the tide on AIDS.

Before PEPFAR, an estimated 100,000 people were on anti-retroviral drugs in sub-Saharan Africa. By the time Bush left office in 2008 that number had increased to about 2 million.

In 2005 Bush started a $1.2 billion initiative to fight malaria. He defended the request for funding in 2007, saying, "There's no reason for little babies to be dying of mosquito bites around the world."

At Thursday's ceremony, President Clinton said in his travels throughout Africa he had "personally seen the faces of some of the millions of people who are alive today" because of Bush's policies.

Even some of Bush's most ardent critics have admitted that his foreign policy legacy on Africa continues to have a lasting effect.

U2 front-man and activist Bono, who criticized Bush on the Iraq War, nonetheless expressed his admiration for the Republican president on an appearance on the Daily Show last year, telling Stewart that Bush did an "amazing" job in the fight against the spread of HIV/AIDS in Africa.

"I know that's hard for you to accept," Bono said to a surprised crowd and host, "but George kind of knocked it out of the park. I can tell you, and I'm actually here to tell you that America now has 5 million people being kept alive by these drugs. That's something that everyone should know."

Since leaving office the former president and his wife, Laura, have continued to stay active in global health issues in Africa, now taking on cancer. The George W. Bush Institute has launched the Pink Ribbon Red Ribbon initiative to try and bring together both public and private investment to fight cervical and breast cancer in Africa and Latin America. The couple launched the program on a visit to Zambia and Bostwana in July of last year.

 
No, he wasn't pandering.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politic...-legacy-on-africa-wins-praise-even-from-foes/

George W. Bush's Legacy on Africa Wins Praise, Even From Foes

At more than $5 billion a year in humanitarian aid to Africa, President Bush has given more assistance to the continent than any other president. His administration's aid was largely targeted to fight the major global health issues facing the continent, HIV/AIDS and malaria.

In 2003 Bush founded the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), which guaranteed $15 million to be spent over the course of five years on prevention, treatment and research on HIV/AIDS. Under the Bush administration, the U.S. was also a leader in contributing to the Global Fund on AIDS.

Though there was controversy over some of the qualifications for PEPFAR funds -up to 20% was to be spent on abstinence-focused prevention programs, and the funds could not be used for needle-sharing programs - most HIV/AIDS activists credit the program for being instrumental in turning the tide on AIDS.

Before PEPFAR, an estimated 100,000 people were on anti-retroviral drugs in sub-Saharan Africa. By the time Bush left office in 2008 that number had increased to about 2 million.

In 2005 Bush started a $1.2 billion initiative to fight malaria. He defended the request for funding in 2007, saying, "There's no reason for little babies to be dying of mosquito bites around the world."

At Thursday's ceremony, President Clinton said in his travels throughout Africa he had "personally seen the faces of some of the millions of people who are alive today" because of Bush's policies.

Even some of Bush's most ardent critics have admitted that his foreign policy legacy on Africa continues to have a lasting effect.

U2 front-man and activist Bono, who criticized Bush on the Iraq War, nonetheless expressed his admiration for the Republican president on an appearance on the Daily Show last year, telling Stewart that Bush did an "amazing" job in the fight against the spread of HIV/AIDS in Africa.

"I know that's hard for you to accept," Bono said to a surprised crowd and host, "but George kind of knocked it out of the park. I can tell you, and I'm actually here to tell you that America now has 5 million people being kept alive by these drugs. That's something that everyone should know."

Since leaving office the former president and his wife, Laura, have continued to stay active in global health issues in Africa, now taking on cancer. The George W. Bush Institute has launched the Pink Ribbon Red Ribbon initiative to try and bring together both public and private investment to fight cervical and breast cancer in Africa and Latin America. The couple launched the program on a visit to Zambia and Bostwana in July of last year.
Awesome find Denny! Bush was always a very genuine person IMO. Didn't like how he ran this country, but loved him as a person.

When he had that speech after 9/11, you knew damn well he was pissed... He wore his heart on his sleeve.
 
I'll be the people of New Orleans think differently. You know when he took 5 days to get there? When he did his flyby and landed in Mobile, AL. You know, the land of the oil fields?

You know it takes a lot more than a jeep for a president to visit a disaster site, right? There are multiple planes full of people and equipment that go along, and it would have been a huge distraction for the first responders to have to deal with it.

So... deal with it.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brief...praises-bushs-katrina-response-on-flight-with

Donna Brazile praises Bush’s Katrina response on flight with Obama

21583.jpg


Donna Brazile, a prominent Democratic political operative, praised President George W. Bush’s response to Hurricane Katrina on Thursday, just hours before President Obama’s speech in New Orleans marking the storm’s 10th anniversary.

Brazile, a Louisiana native, has applauded Bush’s Katrina response before. But she made her latest comments on board Air Force One while flying to the Big Easy with Obama, who has previously criticized’s his predecessor’s handling of the storm recovery.

“Under President Bush’s leadership, we got it right,” she told reporters.

Brazile said Bush’s initial response to the storm was “slow,” but chalked that up to chaos plaguing state and local governments along the Gulf Coast.

She praised Bush for pouring more than $120 billion into rebuilding New Orleans and other Gulf communities over the opposition of some Republicans on Capitol Hill.

“The president made a commitment and I think he kept his word,” said Brazile.

Walter Isaacson, the Aspen Institute CEO who served with Brazile on the Louisiana Recovery Authority, echoed her comments.

“George W. Bush, I think, gets a bum rap,” he told the traveling press corps. “It took a while to get things started, it was a little bit slow. But he cared about the city deeply and so did Laura Bush.”

 
No, he wasn't pandering.

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politic...-legacy-on-africa-wins-praise-even-from-foes/

George W. Bush's Legacy on Africa Wins Praise, Even From Foes

At more than $5 billion a year in humanitarian aid to Africa, President Bush has given more assistance to the continent than any other president. His administration's aid was largely targeted to fight the major global health issues facing the continent, HIV/AIDS and malaria.

In 2003 Bush founded the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), which guaranteed $15 million to be spent over the course of five years on prevention, treatment and research on HIV/AIDS. Under the Bush administration, the U.S. was also a leader in contributing to the Global Fund on AIDS.

Though there was controversy over some of the qualifications for PEPFAR funds -up to 20% was to be spent on abstinence-focused prevention programs, and the funds could not be used for needle-sharing programs - most HIV/AIDS activists credit the program for being instrumental in turning the tide on AIDS.

Before PEPFAR, an estimated 100,000 people were on anti-retroviral drugs in sub-Saharan Africa. By the time Bush left office in 2008 that number had increased to about 2 million.

In 2005 Bush started a $1.2 billion initiative to fight malaria. He defended the request for funding in 2007, saying, "There's no reason for little babies to be dying of mosquito bites around the world."

At Thursday's ceremony, President Clinton said in his travels throughout Africa he had "personally seen the faces of some of the millions of people who are alive today" because of Bush's policies.

Even some of Bush's most ardent critics have admitted that his foreign policy legacy on Africa continues to have a lasting effect.

U2 front-man and activist Bono, who criticized Bush on the Iraq War, nonetheless expressed his admiration for the Republican president on an appearance on the Daily Show last year, telling Stewart that Bush did an "amazing" job in the fight against the spread of HIV/AIDS in Africa.

"I know that's hard for you to accept," Bono said to a surprised crowd and host, "but George kind of knocked it out of the park. I can tell you, and I'm actually here to tell you that America now has 5 million people being kept alive by these drugs. That's something that everyone should know."

Since leaving office the former president and his wife, Laura, have continued to stay active in global health issues in Africa, now taking on cancer. The George W. Bush Institute has launched the Pink Ribbon Red Ribbon initiative to try and bring together both public and private investment to fight cervical and breast cancer in Africa and Latin America. The couple launched the program on a visit to Zambia and Bostwana in July of last year.

Bush is singlehandedly responsible for all of the Aids in Africa. He went over there with his BULLSHIT abstinence program teaching AGAINST the use of condoms. Really?
 
WTF does that mean? That he was good a pandering? GTFO. We don't and haven't liked him. Trust. Are you gonna take a selfie with the President? Hell yeah. Bush or not.

Liking them and feeling that they are inferior aren't mutually exclusive. I'm not saying Bush is racist, I can't read minds. For all I know he was playing Xbox when people were drowning.


I like children, have never wanted one. That doesn't mean anything.

PS, if you say things like "we" didn't like him you shouldn't get mad when people generalize about black people. Goose and Gander and whatnot.
 
Bush is singlehandedly responsible for all of the Aids in Africa. He went over there with his BULLSHIT abstinence program teaching AGAINST the use of condoms. Really?
WTF dude?!?!?! Are you serious?!?!?!
 
You know it takes a lot more than a jeep for a president to visit a disaster site, right? There are multiple planes full of people and equipment that go along, and it would have been a huge distraction for the first responders to have to deal with it.

So... deal with it.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brief...praises-bushs-katrina-response-on-flight-with

Donna Brazile praises Bush’s Katrina response on flight with Obama

21583.jpg


Donna Brazile, a prominent Democratic political operative, praised President George W. Bush’s response to Hurricane Katrina on Thursday, just hours before President Obama’s speech in New Orleans marking the storm’s 10th anniversary.

Brazile, a Louisiana native, has applauded Bush’s Katrina response before. But she made her latest comments on board Air Force One while flying to the Big Easy with Obama, who has previously criticized’s his predecessor’s handling of the storm recovery.

“Under President Bush’s leadership, we got it right,” she told reporters.

Brazile said Bush’s initial response to the storm was “slow,” but chalked that up to chaos plaguing state and local governments along the Gulf Coast.

She praised Bush for pouring more than $120 billion into rebuilding New Orleans and other Gulf communities over the opposition of some Republicans on Capitol Hill.

“The president made a commitment and I think he kept his word,” said Brazile.

Walter Isaacson, the Aspen Institute CEO who served with Brazile on the Louisiana Recovery Authority, echoed her comments.

“George W. Bush, I think, gets a bum rap,” he told the traveling press corps. “It took a while to get things started, it was a little bit slow. But he cared about the city deeply and so did Laura Bush.”

White people always want to tell us shit like "look at these black people who like this" to prove a point. Well the general consensus among US is that we hate bush. Know this and stop telling us.
 
White people always want to tell us shit like "look at these black people who like this" to prove a point. Well the general consensus among US is that we hate bush. Know this and stop telling us.

Dude, you do realize you sound like a loony right now?
 
The epidemic that spread aids. Not for causing the epidemic but he did not help it with abstinence training.
 
Dude, you do realize you sound like a loony right now?

Say what you want but Bush exacerbated the problem. Believe it or not:

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/27/health/american-hiv-battle-in-africa-said-to-falter.html

U.S. Push for Abstinence in Africa Is Seen as Failure Against H.I.V.

SEATTLE — The $1.3 billion that the United States government has spent since 2005 encouraging Africans to avoid AIDS by practicing abstinence and fidelity did not measurably change sexual behavior and was largely wasted, according to a study presented on the last day of an AIDS conference here.

The study, done by a second-year student at Stanford Medical School for a professor with an expertise in cost-benefit analyses, caused a major stir in the room where it was presented.

The researcher, Nathan Lo, analyzed records showing the age of people having sex for the first time, teenage pregnancy and number of sexual partners in international health surveys that have been paid for by the State Department since the 1970s.

His work was overseen by Dr. Eran Bendavid, an assistant professor of medicine at Stanford, who has done previous analyses of American global anti-AIDS programs for the Institute of Medicine, a branch of the National Academy of Sciences.

Global health specialists came to the microphone to congratulate Mr. Lo. Advocates who had long opposed the American policy that sought to prevent AIDS by promoting abstinence and faithfulness applauded.

“That was fantastic,” said Dr. Gilles van Cutsem, medical coordinator for Doctors Without Borders in South Africa.

Staff members from the government program that Mr. Lo had accused of wasting money — Pepfar, the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief — came up afterward to quietly congratulate him. When they realized a reporter was present, they nervously asked that they not be named.

President George W. Bush’s global AIDS plan was enacted in 2003 and marshaled billions of dollars to treat Africans who had AIDS with lifesaving drugs. Conservative Republican leaders in the House of Representatives successfully included a provision that one-third of AIDS prevention money go to programs to encourage abstinence and fidelity. That campaign — known as ABC, for abstain, be faithful and use condoms — was part of the bargain made when Christian conservatives joined with liberals to pass the law.

After Mr. Lo gave his presentation, the moderator asked if anyone from Pepfar in the room would respond. A woman identifying herself as a director of Pepfar’s efforts in an unidentified country said the program — which is led by Dr. Deborah Birx — had just cut the $47 million it still spends on abstinence and fidelity to $21 million. Beyond that, she said, she would have to wait until people at headquarters could read the study.

A spokeswoman for Dr. Birx declined to comment in an email.

Dr. Mark Dybul, who directed Pepfar during most of the Bush administration and now runs the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, said by email that he did not wish to comment. He noted that previous studies by Dr. Bendavid had shown that Pepfar prevented infections and saved lives.

Michael Gerson, now a columnist for The Washington Post who was a Pepfar advocate and a close adviser to President Bush, also said he would have no comment on the study until the experts he trusted could read it.

Mr. Lo said he spent a year analyzing dozens of health surveys that the United States paid for in countries around the world.

Originally called the World Fertility Surveys, they were begun in the 1970s. They were later subsumed into the large Demographic and Health Surveys, now paid for by the United States Agency for International Development, that document health behaviors in dozens of countries. Spending on abstinence and fidelity peaked in 2005 and began to drop after the Obama administration took office in 2009.

Mr. Lo compared data from 1998 to the present in 22 African countries, 14 of which received Pepfar money and eight that did not. He looked at answers to three questions that are part of the extensive questionnaire given to people interviewed: What was your age when you had sex for the first time? At what age did you have your first child? How many people have you had sex with in the last year?

When answers about age at loss of virginity did not appear to be truthful, he said, he used a conservative form of adjustment, calculating backward from the birth of the first child.

Although the numbers changed over time, the differences between the Pepfar and non-Pepfar countries did not change after 2005. That indicated “no detectable effect” from the expenditure, he said.

The differences were so small that, for example, men in the Pepfar countries appeared to have 0.02 more sexual partners after the abstinence and fidelity funding began than they had before.

In the past, Dr. Bendavid said, he approached Pepfar’s chief medical officer more than once suggesting that the Demographic and Health Surveys be used to analyze the effectiveness of the abstinence and fidelity efforts.

“He said it was outside their purview,” Dr. Bendavid said.
 
Last edited:
I did and I think it's bullshit. Read My NY Times article.

You realize that the article you posted said that the abstinence program was actually the "ABC" program, of which the "C" stood for "condoms", right? It kind of undercuts your earlier post.
 
You realize that the article you posted said that the abstinence program was actually the "ABC" program, of which the "C" stood for "condoms", right? It kind of undercuts your earlier post.

What the program was and how it was implemented by the Bush Administration are two different things though.
 
What the program was and how it was implemented by the Bush Administration are two different things though.

If there were a material difference between the two, one would reasonably have expected that particular article to mention it. Do you have any links/articles indicating that the "C" portion of the program was not only neglected, but actively worked against, as you claimed?
 
If there were a material difference between the two, one would reasonably have expected that particular article to mention it. Do you have any links/articles indicating that the "C" portion of the program was not only neglected, but actively worked against, as you claimed?

First of all it's called ABC which means abstinence first. The NY article does state:

U.S. Push for Abstinence in Africa Is Seen as Failure Against H.I.V.

But then there's this:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1564179/

The Problems with A and B without C
By focusing on individual behaviors, the ABC approach does not acknowledge the underlying factors that make people vulnerable to HIV/AIDS. The ABC strategies dismiss the real social, political, and economic causes of the epidemic, and end up blaming infected people, because it is implied that they failed to adopt and practice the ABCs. The ABC approach ignores vulnerable populations, such as sex workers and those who lack the ability to negotiate safe sex. It further fails to address non-heterosexual risk groups such as men who have sex with men and intravenous drug users.

PEPFAR's ABC guidance contains rules for country teams to follow in developing and implementing their sexual prevention strategies, including parameters on the prevention messages that may be delivered to youths. Specifically, although funds may be used to deliver age-appropriate AB information to in-school youths, ages 10–14 years, the funds may not be used to provide information on condoms to these youths or distribute condoms in any school setting, let alone youth out of school. And yet as many as 16 percent of all women in Uganda have sex before the age of 15 years [49].

The ABC campaign assumes abstinence will allow young women to focus on going to school, controlling their relationships, and becoming socially empowered, and yet it fails to acknowledge the social circumstances driving sex in the first place. Many sexual relationships include transactional or commercial sex, in order to pay for post-secondary schooling, to gain fi nancial independence from family obligations, or to provide adequate resources for those contained in IDP camps [50]. Encouraging abstinence, while at the same time excluding sexual education and protection against HIV, puts these girls at great danger of exploitation and ignorance, depriving them of the opportunity to learn the needed tools to approach sexuality in a healthy and informed manner.

Ironically, by promoting marriage (Be faithful) as a prevention measure, this campaign negates one of the highest risk groups in Africa: monogamous, married women [50]. Surveys suggest a high incidence of extramarital sexual activity and STIs among some married men [50]. It is still widely believed in Uganda that women have no right to deny their husbands sex [51]. The assumption of the campaign that sex is a rational act and that women have the autonomy to choose abstinence ignores the forces behind the initiation of sex. The presumption that marriage is somehow protective is misleading and potentially dangerous for young women already deprived of proper sexual education.

The enormous disservice done by the recent campaign to discourage condom use (due to the assumed link to promiscuity) cannot be overemphasized. The effectiveness of condom use for prevention of HIV/AIDS is the most likely explanation for Uganda's early successes [45]. Deemphasizing the importance of condom use has the serious potential to hurt local prevention efforts. A 2005 study by researchers at Makerere University and the AIDS Information Centre showed that Ugandans aged 19–25 years were more concerned about getting pregnant than becoming infected with HIV; when condoms were used, they were primarily considered contraceptive tools rather than protection against infections [52]. The confusion in young women and men who initially doubted the efficacy of condoms has only been amplified by these new efforts by the Ugandan government [49]
 
So no @magnifier661 I don't sound like a loony. You know that Christians preach abstinence and always have. Republicans didn't even want to add the C part into the bill until Democrats added it as an amendment.
 
First of all it's called ABC which means abstinence first. The NY article does state:

U.S. Push for Abstinence in Africa Is Seen as Failure Against H.I.V.

But then there's this:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1564179/

The Problems with A and B without C
By focusing on individual behaviors, the ABC approach does not acknowledge the underlying factors that make people vulnerable to HIV/AIDS. The ABC strategies dismiss the real social, political, and economic causes of the epidemic, and end up blaming infected people, because it is implied that they failed to adopt and practice the ABCs. The ABC approach ignores vulnerable populations, such as sex workers and those who lack the ability to negotiate safe sex. It further fails to address non-heterosexual risk groups such as men who have sex with men and intravenous drug users.

PEPFAR's ABC guidance contains rules for country teams to follow in developing and implementing their sexual prevention strategies, including parameters on the prevention messages that may be delivered to youths. Specifically, although funds may be used to deliver age-appropriate AB information to in-school youths, ages 10–14 years, the funds may not be used to provide information on condoms to these youths or distribute condoms in any school setting, let alone youth out of school. And yet as many as 16 percent of all women in Uganda have sex before the age of 15 years [49].

The ABC campaign assumes abstinence will allow young women to focus on going to school, controlling their relationships, and becoming socially empowered, and yet it fails to acknowledge the social circumstances driving sex in the first place. Many sexual relationships include transactional or commercial sex, in order to pay for post-secondary schooling, to gain fi nancial independence from family obligations, or to provide adequate resources for those contained in IDP camps [50]. Encouraging abstinence, while at the same time excluding sexual education and protection against HIV, puts these girls at great danger of exploitation and ignorance, depriving them of the opportunity to learn the needed tools to approach sexuality in a healthy and informed manner.

Ironically, by promoting marriage (Be faithful) as a prevention measure, this campaign negates one of the highest risk groups in Africa: monogamous, married women [50]. Surveys suggest a high incidence of extramarital sexual activity and STIs among some married men [50]. It is still widely believed in Uganda that women have no right to deny their husbands sex [51]. The assumption of the campaign that sex is a rational act and that women have the autonomy to choose abstinence ignores the forces behind the initiation of sex. The presumption that marriage is somehow protective is misleading and potentially dangerous for young women already deprived of proper sexual education.

The enormous disservice done by the recent campaign to discourage condom use (due to the assumed link to promiscuity) cannot be overemphasized. The effectiveness of condom use for prevention of HIV/AIDS is the most likely explanation for Uganda's early successes [45]. Deemphasizing the importance of condom use has the serious potential to hurt local prevention efforts. A 2005 study by researchers at Makerere University and the AIDS Information Centre showed that Ugandans aged 19–25 years were more concerned about getting pregnant than becoming infected with HIV; when condoms were used, they were primarily considered contraceptive tools rather than protection against infections [52]. The confusion in young women and men who initially doubted the efficacy of condoms has only been amplified by these new efforts by the Ugandan government [49]
Interesting. I appreciate you posting that. Still a massive leap between that article and your earlier "AIDS IS ALL BUSH'S FAULT" post.
 
Interesting. I appreciate you posting that. Still a massive leap between that article and your earlier "AIDS IS ALL BUSH'S FAULT" post.

The epidemic that spread aids. Not for causing the epidemic but he did not help it with abstinence training.

I tried to clarify that with the above post. Bottom line it was a waste of over 1.3 Billion as it did nothing but cause the spread of more HIV.
 
I tried to clarify that with the above post. Bottom line it was a waste of over 1.3 Billion.

Wow, a politician's program wasted money. I'm shocked, shocked I tell you!
 
So no @magnifier661 I don't sound like a loony. You know that Christians preach abstinence and always have. Republicans didn't even want to add the C part into the bill until Democrats added it as an amendment.
You sounding like a looney is when you spoke for all black people and blamed aids on Bush. Lol
 
Wow, a politician's program wasted money. I'm shocked, shocked I tell you!

My contention is that he didn't want to do anything about it anyway. Say what you want but I don't believe for one second that he wanted to do anything about the AIDS epidemic in Africa. You don't teach people abstinence. You just don't. It's never worked and it's the reason why Texas (Republican Testing ground) has the highest teen pregnancy in the nation. Also, they were forced to add the condoms portion that they never wanted to add anyway. Besides the bottom line of money wasted it exacerbated the AIDS problem and my conspiracy theory is that that was the plan.
 
You sounding like a looney is when you spoke for all black people and blamed aids on Bush. Lol

Usually if you want the opinion of black people you ask a black person instead of making it up as you go along. I also did clarify my statement about AIDS and bush. When Kanye said what he said he was speaking for the majority of us and it is true. I'm sure your one or two black friends can probably confirm it.
 
Back
Top