Andre Miller is not a better player than Hedo Turkoglu, especially at this stage of their career. I could care less about the contract if it brings a ring. People bitched about Rashard Lewis contract but last year he probably earned every penny when they made the finals and he made shot to get them there.
What support do you have Turk being better than Hedo?
Both are not "defenders", but play well within a team defense concept.
Both are as much creators/facilitators as they are scorers. This is good when you already have good scorers on your team. But, this also means you don't want to overpay for this "role player", as you will certainly need to pay your scorers.
Both are experienced, don't have "issues", coaches like them, other intangibles are not a big differentiator.
Miller plays a position of scarcity. It is much harder to get an above average PG or center than any other position.
Turk, of course, does not play a position of scarcity.
Turk, was the 4th best player (Howard, Lewis, Nelson - all All-Stars) and the 3rd most important for the playoff run after Nelson went down, on a 59 win team.
Miller was the 2nd best player (after AI, not an all-star), and the "most important" player, according to one of his coaches, to a 41 win team.
Miller was 32 last season. Turk was 29 last season. A 5 yr guaranteed contract for Turk is similar in one respect to a 2 yr guaranteed contract for Miller in that last year age is 34.
Last season PER: Turk: 14.8 Dre: 18.6
Career PER: Turk: 15.1 Dre: 18.0
Sure doesn't look like last season's numbers are much of a fluke, since both players track to their career averages.
Last season Win Shares: Turk: 7.4 Dre: 8.6
Despite his team winning many more games, this stat claims it wasn't because of Hedo.
It is hard to compare different positions, and hard to compare the 2nd best player on a .500 ball club to a role player on a championship contender that features an MVP caliber player, but I don't see how you can be so sure that Turk is better than Miller. Stats don't back it up.