Disgraced former ref Tim Donhagy admits to making bets with other refs about Rasheed Wallace (1 Viewer)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Chris Craig

(Blazersland) I'm Your Huckleberry, Beardo
Staff member
Global Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jun 25, 2015
Messages
62,003
Likes
62,531
Points
113

When former NBA swingman Jim Jackson welcomed ex-referee Tim Donaghy to his podcast, the conversation quickly took a sharp turn. They ended up diving into a topic few fans ever hear about.

Jackson opened by asking about what referees discussed in the locker room before games — whether they’d coordinate what to call, who to give the benefit of the doubt, or who to really ride hard.

Donaghy didn’t shy away from giving listeners a glimpse into it all. He, for instance, shared how officials used to handle Rasheed Wallace, including the locker room bets they made.

Locker room bets

Most players usually hyping each other up in the locker room. Some are going over last-minute game plans. The referees’ room ran a little differently back then, Donaghy said.

That said, he remembered those pregame meetings where referees quietly discussed how to handle certain players.

Some, like Jackson, barely came up. Donaghy described the former 6'6" NBA player as good-natured and easy to deal with.

Others, like Wallace, were another story. Why? Because, as Donaghy put it, many referees just couldn’t stand the four-time All-Star. That reputation followed Wallace onto the court. It often dictated how officials called the game when he was on the field.

That’s somewhat understandable, right?

What really stood out, though, was something else — Donaghy admitting that refs sometimes made small, informal bets.

Often at the center of those bets? The 2004 NBA champion with the Detroit Pistons.

We used to bet $20 or $50 in the locker room to see who would give him (Wallace) the first technical foul,” Donaghy said.

Why Wallace is also to blame

Sure, it’s easy to call that kind of behavior unprofessional. Truthfully, it was. After all, referees are supposed to be neutral. Betting on things like that doesn’t exactly fit the job description.

Still, total impartiality is more ideal than reality. Referees are human. They have opinions, grudges and bad days like anyone else.

And when you think about how volatile Wallace could be, that human side really comes into focus. That makes even more sense when you think about the sentiment that the former Piston might’ve been the most volatile player ever to step onto an NBA court.

A reputation like that? Well, it never earns much sympathy from officials. Wallace definitely didn’t get any from Donaghy.

Both had a rather tense history. One incident that highlighted this happened during a Portland Trail Blazers–Memphis Grizzlies matchup.

Wallace picked up a technical for tossing the ball after a call he didn’t like. Later, he confronted Donaghy, who was part of that night’s referee crew, in the parking lot. Sheed was still furious. Luckily, security and teammate Brevin Knight stepped in before things got ugly.

It was another moment that made staying neutral nearly impossible. It probably influenced Donaghy’s view when he told Jackson that “personalities with referees and players conflicting had a lot to do with how the whistle was blown out on the floor.”

Ultimately, Wallace still holds the single-season record for technical fouls. In 2000–01, he picked up 41 over 80 games. His 317 career techs rank third all-time. And after hearing Donaghy’s story, you can’t help but wonder which referees might’ve profited the most from those.
 
Rasheed Wallace was a cancer. He was the problem not the other way around. I literally worked with a guy everyone called an asshole. Everybody always said “Well he’s just an asshole. We all know that. Nothing you can do about it” I always said why? “Why is there nothing we can do? Why do some people get a free pass just because everyone just expects them to be what they have proven they are.
Rasheed Wallace indeed got away with way too much. Should have been thrown off the team before he cost the Blazers their best chance at a championship in the last 30 years.
 
Rasheed Wallace was a cancer. He was the problem not the other way around. I literally worked with a guy everyone called an asshole. Everybody always said “Well he’s just an asshole. We all know that. Nothing you can do about it” I always said why? “Why is there nothing we can do? Why do some people get a free pass just because everyone just expects them to be what they have proven they are.
Rasheed Wallace indeed got away with way too much. Should have been thrown off the team before he cost the Blazers their best chance at a championship in the last 30 years.
Sheed was the best player on the team that got us closest to a title since Clyde. He had his weaknesses but this take is way off. Also, in case it's escaped you Sheed's teammates loved him. Yeah, he had way too short of a fuse on the court especially with refs... the refs allowed his habits to dictate how short their fuse was with him, which was their fault, not the other way around.

So again Sheed wasn't the perfect guy to lead us to a championship because of both his temper in games and the fact that he wasn't consistent in terms of dominating games. That being said he was the best player on a team that was one quarter away from winning the de facto NBA Finals, which at the time was the Western Conference Finals.

Yeah that fourth quarter still haunts most of us but again your take on Rasheed is way way off.
 
The Refs started giving Sheed techs in the first quarter of games for no justifiable reason in what was assumed to be preemption to get him to behave or be tossed. That didn't piss Sheed off at all of course. It pissed me off plenty.
 
Also, this Donahy revelation is old news. We knew this way back then.
Were we aware that prior to games the ref crews were betting on who would T him up first? I wasn't, though it sure seemed like something was up. Sheed was of course a notorious hot head, but they would seem to go out of their way to bait him with the worst ticky tack calls and then hair trigger T him up when he responded in hopes he'd go full volcano and they'd get to righteously toss him

if true, 100% completely unprofessional and making the sport a pathetic joke. But that was Stern's league back then, little about the way the officiating was conducted was about being even handed. It was about making sure the stars starred and the right markets advanced/won so the money kept flowing.

STOMP
 
Were we aware that prior to games the ref crews were betting on who would T him up first? I wasn't, though it sure seemed like something was up. Sheed was of course a notorious hot head, but they would seem to go out of their way to bait him with the worst ticky tack calls and then hair trigger T him up when he responded in hopes he'd go full volcano and they'd get to righteously toss him

if true, 100% completely unprofessional and making the sport a pathetic joke. But that was Stern's league back then, little about the way the officiating was conducted was about being even handed. It was about making sure the stars starred and the right markets advanced/won so the money kept flowing.

STOMP
Agreed; Silver’s take on reffing isn’t “rules as written” but it has a consistent point of view: play an entertaining game by playing to score, playing until after the whistle blows, and acknowledging and respecting the refs time. I hated the reffing in Stern’s era because it was such a craps shoot with refs trying to upstage the players; at least this era is comprehensible, and generally goes along with the kind of NBA action I as a fan like to see. Silver should take it as a compliment that I don’t know who most of the refs are game to game.
 
Issue isn't whether you liked Rasheed Wallace. Or whether you thought him good or bad for the Blazers. If this report is true, referees, who are supposed to be neutral were betting on issuing technical fouls to a player. Putting thumb on scale in a game. Sheed could be worst human in history of NBA and it would not justify this.
 
Were we aware that prior to games the ref crews were betting on who would T him up first? I wasn't, though it sure seemed like something was up. Sheed was of course a notorious hot head, but they would seem to go out of their way to bait him with the worst ticky tack calls and then hair trigger T him up when he responded in hopes he'd go full volcano and they'd get to righteously toss him

if true, 100% completely unprofessional and making the sport a pathetic joke. But that was Stern's league back then, little about the way the officiating was conducted was about being even handed. It was about making sure the stars starred and the right markets advanced/won so the money kept flowing.

STOMP
Agreed. The writer seems to be trying to justify the refs' behavior, but all them should have been fired and banned from reffing for life.
 
Sheed was the best player on the team that got us closest to a title since Clyde. He had his weaknesses but this take is way off. Also, in case it's escaped you Sheed's teammates loved him. Yeah, he had way too short of a fuse on the court especially with refs... the refs allowed his habits to dictate how short their fuse was with him, which was their fault, not the other way around.

So again Sheed wasn't the perfect guy to lead us to a championship because of both his temper in games and the fact that he wasn't consistent in terms of dominating games. That being said he was the best player on a team that was one quarter away from winning the de facto NBA Finals, which at the time was the Western Conference Finals.

Yeah that fourth quarter still haunts most of us but again your take on Rasheed is way way off.
Actually you’re wrong but I’ll let you continue to think that your position has merit.
I certainly will not be changing my opinion on this.
 
Actually you’re wrong but I’ll let you continue to think that your position has merit.
I certainly will not be changing my opinion on this.

source.gif
 

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Back
    Top